盆腔器官脱垂(POP)手术后压力性尿失禁的风险预测模型:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Bi Jun Yu, Hao Chong He, Li Wang, Han Mei Shao, Ying Min Liu, Xiao Ying Yan, Jian Liu
{"title":"盆腔器官脱垂(POP)手术后压力性尿失禁的风险预测模型:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Bi Jun Yu, Hao Chong He, Li Wang, Han Mei Shao, Ying Min Liu, Xiao Ying Yan, Jian Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03584-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate existing developed and validated predictive models for stress urinary incontinence after pelvic floor reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant literature in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, OVID, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), Wan Fang Database, VIP database and Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System (SinoMed) were search from inception to 1 March 2024. Literature screening and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers. The chosen study's statistics included study design, data sources, outcome definitions, sample size, predictors, model development, and performance. The Predictive Modelling Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) checklist was used to assess risk of bias and applicability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7 studies containing 9 predictive models were included. All studies had a high risk of bias, primarily due to retrospective design, small sample sizes, single-center trials, lack of blinding, and missing data reporting. The meta-analysis revealed moderate heterogeneity (I² = 68.8%). The pooled AUC value of the validated models was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.79), indicating moderate predictive ability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prediction models evaluated demonstrated moderate discrimination, but significant bias and methodological flaws. The meta-analysis revealed moderate heterogeneity (I² = 68.8%) among the included studies, reflecting differences in study populations, predictors, and methods, which limits the generalizability of the findings. Despite these challenges, these models highlight the potential to identify high-risk patients for targeted interventions to improve surgical outcomes and reduce postoperative complications. The findings suggest that by integrating these models into clinical decision-making, clinicians can better tailor surgical plans and preoperative counseling, thereby improving patient satisfaction and reducing the incidence of postoperative stress urinary incontinence. Future research should follow TRIPOD and PROBAST principles, focus on addressing sources of heterogeneity, improve model development through robust designs, large sample sizes, comprehensive predictors, and novel modelling approaches, and validate tools that can be effectively integrated into clinical decision-making to manage stress urinary incontinence after pelvic floor reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk prediction models for stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Bi Jun Yu, Hao Chong He, Li Wang, Han Mei Shao, Ying Min Liu, Xiao Ying Yan, Jian Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12905-025-03584-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate existing developed and validated predictive models for stress urinary incontinence after pelvic floor reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant literature in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, OVID, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), Wan Fang Database, VIP database and Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System (SinoMed) were search from inception to 1 March 2024. Literature screening and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers. The chosen study's statistics included study design, data sources, outcome definitions, sample size, predictors, model development, and performance. The Predictive Modelling Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) checklist was used to assess risk of bias and applicability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7 studies containing 9 predictive models were included. All studies had a high risk of bias, primarily due to retrospective design, small sample sizes, single-center trials, lack of blinding, and missing data reporting. The meta-analysis revealed moderate heterogeneity (I² = 68.8%). The pooled AUC value of the validated models was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.79), indicating moderate predictive ability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prediction models evaluated demonstrated moderate discrimination, but significant bias and methodological flaws. The meta-analysis revealed moderate heterogeneity (I² = 68.8%) among the included studies, reflecting differences in study populations, predictors, and methods, which limits the generalizability of the findings. Despite these challenges, these models highlight the potential to identify high-risk patients for targeted interventions to improve surgical outcomes and reduce postoperative complications. The findings suggest that by integrating these models into clinical decision-making, clinicians can better tailor surgical plans and preoperative counseling, thereby improving patient satisfaction and reducing the incidence of postoperative stress urinary incontinence. Future research should follow TRIPOD and PROBAST principles, focus on addressing sources of heterogeneity, improve model development through robust designs, large sample sizes, comprehensive predictors, and novel modelling approaches, and validate tools that can be effectively integrated into clinical decision-making to manage stress urinary incontinence after pelvic floor reconstruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806609/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03584-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03584-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:系统评价现有发展和验证的盆底重建后压力性尿失禁的预测模型。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、OVID、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库、VIP数据库和中国生物医学文献服务系统(SinoMed)自成立至2024年3月1日的相关文献。文献筛选和资料提取由两位研究者独立完成。所选研究的统计数据包括研究设计、数据来源、结果定义、样本量、预测因子、模型开发和性能。使用预测建模偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)检查表评估偏倚风险和适用性。结果:共纳入7项研究,共纳入9个预测模型。所有的研究都有较高的偏倚风险,主要是由于回顾性设计、小样本量、单中心试验、缺乏盲法和缺少数据报告。meta分析显示中度异质性(I²= 68.8%)。验证模型的合并AUC值为0.72 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.79),表明预测能力中等。结论:所评估的预测模型具有中等程度的歧视,但存在显著的偏倚和方法学缺陷。meta分析显示纳入的研究存在中度异质性(I²= 68.8%),反映了研究人群、预测因子和方法的差异,这限制了研究结果的普遍性。尽管存在这些挑战,但这些模型强调了识别高危患者以进行有针对性干预以改善手术结果和减少术后并发症的潜力。研究结果提示,通过将这些模型整合到临床决策中,临床医生可以更好地定制手术方案和术前咨询,从而提高患者满意度,减少术后应激性尿失禁的发生率。未来的研究应遵循TRIPOD和PROBAST原则,专注于解决异质性的来源,通过稳健的设计、大样本量、全面的预测指标和新颖的建模方法来改进模型的开发,并验证可以有效地整合到临床决策中的工具,以管理盆底重建后的压力性尿失禁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk prediction models for stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: To systematically evaluate existing developed and validated predictive models for stress urinary incontinence after pelvic floor reconstruction.

Methods: Relevant literature in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, OVID, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), Wan Fang Database, VIP database and Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System (SinoMed) were search from inception to 1 March 2024. Literature screening and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers. The chosen study's statistics included study design, data sources, outcome definitions, sample size, predictors, model development, and performance. The Predictive Modelling Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) checklist was used to assess risk of bias and applicability.

Results: A total of 7 studies containing 9 predictive models were included. All studies had a high risk of bias, primarily due to retrospective design, small sample sizes, single-center trials, lack of blinding, and missing data reporting. The meta-analysis revealed moderate heterogeneity (I² = 68.8%). The pooled AUC value of the validated models was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.79), indicating moderate predictive ability.

Conclusion: The prediction models evaluated demonstrated moderate discrimination, but significant bias and methodological flaws. The meta-analysis revealed moderate heterogeneity (I² = 68.8%) among the included studies, reflecting differences in study populations, predictors, and methods, which limits the generalizability of the findings. Despite these challenges, these models highlight the potential to identify high-risk patients for targeted interventions to improve surgical outcomes and reduce postoperative complications. The findings suggest that by integrating these models into clinical decision-making, clinicians can better tailor surgical plans and preoperative counseling, thereby improving patient satisfaction and reducing the incidence of postoperative stress urinary incontinence. Future research should follow TRIPOD and PROBAST principles, focus on addressing sources of heterogeneity, improve model development through robust designs, large sample sizes, comprehensive predictors, and novel modelling approaches, and validate tools that can be effectively integrated into clinical decision-making to manage stress urinary incontinence after pelvic floor reconstruction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信