手骨关节炎护理质量指标的发展——来自欧洲共识研究的结果

Daniel H. Bordvik , Yeliz Prior , Rachael Bamford , Francis Berenbaum , Mathilda Björk , Thalita Blanck , Barbara Slatkowsky Christensen , Krysia Dziedzic , John Edwards , Nazemin Gilanliogullari , Carol Graham , Ida K. Haugen , Margreet Kloppenburg , Hellen Laheij , Marco J.P.F. Ritt , Tanja Stamm , Anne Therese Tveter , Nina Østerås , Ingvild Kjeken
{"title":"手骨关节炎护理质量指标的发展——来自欧洲共识研究的结果","authors":"Daniel H. Bordvik ,&nbsp;Yeliz Prior ,&nbsp;Rachael Bamford ,&nbsp;Francis Berenbaum ,&nbsp;Mathilda Björk ,&nbsp;Thalita Blanck ,&nbsp;Barbara Slatkowsky Christensen ,&nbsp;Krysia Dziedzic ,&nbsp;John Edwards ,&nbsp;Nazemin Gilanliogullari ,&nbsp;Carol Graham ,&nbsp;Ida K. Haugen ,&nbsp;Margreet Kloppenburg ,&nbsp;Hellen Laheij ,&nbsp;Marco J.P.F. Ritt ,&nbsp;Tanja Stamm ,&nbsp;Anne Therese Tveter ,&nbsp;Nina Østerås ,&nbsp;Ingvild Kjeken","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>People with hand osteoarthritis (OA) often have poor access to recommended treatments. To enhance care quality, quality indicators (QIs) based on clinical recommendations are essential. Current QI sets, like the Osteoarthritis Quality Indicator Questionnaire (OA-QI v.2), primarily address hip- and knee OA, and not hand OA.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To adapt the OA-QI v.2 for assessing patient-reported quality of hand OA care.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We used the OA-QI v.2. set as a starting point and adapted it to reflect hand OA care. A literature search was performed to identify potential QIs for hand OA following the Rand/UCLA Appropriateness method. A European expert panel, comprising researchers, clinicians, and patient research partners, participated in online meetings to discuss adaptation and suggest new QIs based on treatment recommendations for hand OA, and anonymously rated each suggested QI regarding its importance, validity, usefulness, and feasibility. Consensus was defined by predefined rating cut-off scores. The adapted questionnaire was translated from English into Norwegian. Cognitive debriefing interviews with Norwegian and UK hand OA patients were conducted to ensure clarity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our initial literature search provided 1670 articles, with none describing relevant QIs. After three voting rounds, sixteen QI items reached consensus, reflecting current hand OA care standards. Items were generally well understood, requiring only minor clarity amendments after patient interviews (N ​= ​28).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The OA-QI v.2 was successfully adapted into a 16-item Hand OA-QI set ensuring alignment with international care standards for hand OA through literature review, international expert panels and patient feedback on language and layout.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100578"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of quality indicators for hand osteoarthritis care – Results from an European consensus study\",\"authors\":\"Daniel H. Bordvik ,&nbsp;Yeliz Prior ,&nbsp;Rachael Bamford ,&nbsp;Francis Berenbaum ,&nbsp;Mathilda Björk ,&nbsp;Thalita Blanck ,&nbsp;Barbara Slatkowsky Christensen ,&nbsp;Krysia Dziedzic ,&nbsp;John Edwards ,&nbsp;Nazemin Gilanliogullari ,&nbsp;Carol Graham ,&nbsp;Ida K. Haugen ,&nbsp;Margreet Kloppenburg ,&nbsp;Hellen Laheij ,&nbsp;Marco J.P.F. Ritt ,&nbsp;Tanja Stamm ,&nbsp;Anne Therese Tveter ,&nbsp;Nina Østerås ,&nbsp;Ingvild Kjeken\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>People with hand osteoarthritis (OA) often have poor access to recommended treatments. To enhance care quality, quality indicators (QIs) based on clinical recommendations are essential. Current QI sets, like the Osteoarthritis Quality Indicator Questionnaire (OA-QI v.2), primarily address hip- and knee OA, and not hand OA.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To adapt the OA-QI v.2 for assessing patient-reported quality of hand OA care.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We used the OA-QI v.2. set as a starting point and adapted it to reflect hand OA care. A literature search was performed to identify potential QIs for hand OA following the Rand/UCLA Appropriateness method. A European expert panel, comprising researchers, clinicians, and patient research partners, participated in online meetings to discuss adaptation and suggest new QIs based on treatment recommendations for hand OA, and anonymously rated each suggested QI regarding its importance, validity, usefulness, and feasibility. Consensus was defined by predefined rating cut-off scores. The adapted questionnaire was translated from English into Norwegian. Cognitive debriefing interviews with Norwegian and UK hand OA patients were conducted to ensure clarity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our initial literature search provided 1670 articles, with none describing relevant QIs. After three voting rounds, sixteen QI items reached consensus, reflecting current hand OA care standards. Items were generally well understood, requiring only minor clarity amendments after patient interviews (N ​= ​28).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The OA-QI v.2 was successfully adapted into a 16-item Hand OA-QI set ensuring alignment with international care standards for hand OA through literature review, international expert panels and patient feedback on language and layout.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100578\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913125000147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913125000147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手骨关节炎(OA)患者通常很难获得推荐的治疗方法。为了提高护理质量,基于临床建议的质量指标(QIs)至关重要。目前的QI集,如骨关节炎质量指标问卷(OA-QI v.2),主要针对髋关节和膝关节OA,而不是手部OA。目的采用OA- qi v.2评价患者报告的手部OA护理质量。我们使用了OA-QI v.2。设定为起点,并加以调整,以反映手部OA护理。采用Rand/UCLA适当性方法进行文献检索,以确定手部OA的潜在QIs。一个由研究人员、临床医生和患者研究合作伙伴组成的欧洲专家小组参加了在线会议,讨论适应并根据手部OA的治疗建议提出新的质量指标,并根据其重要性、有效性、有用性和可行性对每个建议的质量指标进行匿名评级。共识是由预定义的评级分界点来定义的。改编后的问卷由英语翻译成挪威语。对挪威和英国的手OA患者进行认知汇报访谈以确保清晰。结果我们初步检索了1670篇文献,没有一篇文献描述了相关的QIs。经过三轮投票,16个QI项目达成共识,反映了当前手部OA护理标准。项目通常被很好地理解,在患者访谈后只需要轻微的澄清修改(N = 28)。结论通过文献综述、国际专家小组和患者对语言和布局的反馈,将OA- qi v.2成功改编为一套16项手部OA- qi,确保与国际手部OA护理标准保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of quality indicators for hand osteoarthritis care – Results from an European consensus study

Background

People with hand osteoarthritis (OA) often have poor access to recommended treatments. To enhance care quality, quality indicators (QIs) based on clinical recommendations are essential. Current QI sets, like the Osteoarthritis Quality Indicator Questionnaire (OA-QI v.2), primarily address hip- and knee OA, and not hand OA.

Objectives

To adapt the OA-QI v.2 for assessing patient-reported quality of hand OA care.

Design

We used the OA-QI v.2. set as a starting point and adapted it to reflect hand OA care. A literature search was performed to identify potential QIs for hand OA following the Rand/UCLA Appropriateness method. A European expert panel, comprising researchers, clinicians, and patient research partners, participated in online meetings to discuss adaptation and suggest new QIs based on treatment recommendations for hand OA, and anonymously rated each suggested QI regarding its importance, validity, usefulness, and feasibility. Consensus was defined by predefined rating cut-off scores. The adapted questionnaire was translated from English into Norwegian. Cognitive debriefing interviews with Norwegian and UK hand OA patients were conducted to ensure clarity.

Results

Our initial literature search provided 1670 articles, with none describing relevant QIs. After three voting rounds, sixteen QI items reached consensus, reflecting current hand OA care standards. Items were generally well understood, requiring only minor clarity amendments after patient interviews (N ​= ​28).

Conclusion

The OA-QI v.2 was successfully adapted into a 16-item Hand OA-QI set ensuring alignment with international care standards for hand OA through literature review, international expert panels and patient feedback on language and layout.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信