DNA提取方法在肠道真菌群落评价中的作用。

IF 1.8 4区 生物学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
Néstor D Portela, Cristian Mena, Mauricio G Martín, Verónica L Burstein, Laura S Chiapello, Susana A Pesoa
{"title":"DNA提取方法在肠道真菌群落评价中的作用。","authors":"Néstor D Portela, Cristian Mena, Mauricio G Martín, Verónica L Burstein, Laura S Chiapello, Susana A Pesoa","doi":"10.1016/j.ram.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the gut mycobiota composition and its impact on health requires reliable methods for fungal community assessment. This study explores the influence of DNA extraction methods in GM analysis. Three protocols were evaluated: Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit with mechanical glass bead lysis (DNgb), Thermofisher MagMax Microbiome ultra-nucleic isolation kit automated method (MM), and MM combined with glass beads lysis (MMgb). Fecal samples from healthy volunteers were collected, DNA extracted and ITS2 amplicon library preparation and sequencing performed. Results showed that DNA yields did not significantly differ among methods and the addition of glass bead beating favored the recovery of DNA more appropriate for fungal analysis. Beta diversity revealed distinct clusters, with MMgb showing the most pronounced variation in mycobiota composition, exposing particularly the low abundance taxa. LEfSe analysis identified significant differences in the abundance of fungal species among the extraction methods. Samples extracted with bead beating were enriched in filamentous species, while those without this step showed higher relative abundance of yeast fungi. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate DNA extraction methods for accurate characterization of the gut mycobiota, emphasizing the need for standardized methodologies to ensure reproducibility and reliability in microbial data acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":21163,"journal":{"name":"Revista Argentina de microbiologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of DNA extraction method in gut fungal community assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Néstor D Portela, Cristian Mena, Mauricio G Martín, Verónica L Burstein, Laura S Chiapello, Susana A Pesoa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ram.2024.12.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Understanding the gut mycobiota composition and its impact on health requires reliable methods for fungal community assessment. This study explores the influence of DNA extraction methods in GM analysis. Three protocols were evaluated: Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit with mechanical glass bead lysis (DNgb), Thermofisher MagMax Microbiome ultra-nucleic isolation kit automated method (MM), and MM combined with glass beads lysis (MMgb). Fecal samples from healthy volunteers were collected, DNA extracted and ITS2 amplicon library preparation and sequencing performed. Results showed that DNA yields did not significantly differ among methods and the addition of glass bead beating favored the recovery of DNA more appropriate for fungal analysis. Beta diversity revealed distinct clusters, with MMgb showing the most pronounced variation in mycobiota composition, exposing particularly the low abundance taxa. LEfSe analysis identified significant differences in the abundance of fungal species among the extraction methods. Samples extracted with bead beating were enriched in filamentous species, while those without this step showed higher relative abundance of yeast fungi. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate DNA extraction methods for accurate characterization of the gut mycobiota, emphasizing the need for standardized methodologies to ensure reproducibility and reliability in microbial data acquisition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Argentina de microbiologia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Argentina de microbiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2024.12.005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Argentina de microbiologia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2024.12.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解肠道真菌菌群组成及其对健康的影响需要可靠的真菌群落评估方法。本研究探讨了DNA提取方法对转基因分析的影响。评估了三种方案:Qiagen DNeasy血液和组织试剂盒与机械玻璃珠裂解(DNgb), Thermofisher MagMax微生物组超核分离试剂盒自动化方法(MM)和MM联合玻璃珠裂解(MMgb)。收集健康志愿者的粪便样本,提取DNA,制备ITS2扩增子文库并进行测序。结果表明,不同方法的DNA产率差异不显著,添加玻璃珠加热有利于恢复更适合真菌分析的DNA。β多样性呈现出明显的集群,其中MMgb显示出最明显的真菌群组成变化,特别是低丰度的分类群。LEfSe分析发现,不同提取方法的真菌种类丰度差异显著。经捶打头提取的样品中丝状真菌种类丰富,而未经捶打头提取的样品中酵母真菌的相对丰度较高。本研究强调了选择合适的DNA提取方法对准确表征肠道菌群的重要性,强调了标准化方法的必要性,以确保微生物数据采集的可重复性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of DNA extraction method in gut fungal community assessment.

Understanding the gut mycobiota composition and its impact on health requires reliable methods for fungal community assessment. This study explores the influence of DNA extraction methods in GM analysis. Three protocols were evaluated: Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit with mechanical glass bead lysis (DNgb), Thermofisher MagMax Microbiome ultra-nucleic isolation kit automated method (MM), and MM combined with glass beads lysis (MMgb). Fecal samples from healthy volunteers were collected, DNA extracted and ITS2 amplicon library preparation and sequencing performed. Results showed that DNA yields did not significantly differ among methods and the addition of glass bead beating favored the recovery of DNA more appropriate for fungal analysis. Beta diversity revealed distinct clusters, with MMgb showing the most pronounced variation in mycobiota composition, exposing particularly the low abundance taxa. LEfSe analysis identified significant differences in the abundance of fungal species among the extraction methods. Samples extracted with bead beating were enriched in filamentous species, while those without this step showed higher relative abundance of yeast fungi. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate DNA extraction methods for accurate characterization of the gut mycobiota, emphasizing the need for standardized methodologies to ensure reproducibility and reliability in microbial data acquisition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Argentina de Microbiología es una publicación trimestral editada por la Asociación Argentina de Microbiología y destinada a la difusión de trabajos científicos en las distintas áreas de la Microbiología. La Asociación Argentina de Microbiología se reserva los derechos de propiedad y reproducción del material aceptado y publicado.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信