[设计促进参与的数字卫生素养:为慢性病患者制定课程方案的经验]。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gabriele Seidel, Anabel Bornemann, Antje Meyer, Jürgen Kretschmer, Jens Krug, Marie-Luise Dierks
{"title":"[设计促进参与的数字卫生素养:为慢性病患者制定课程方案的经验]。","authors":"Gabriele Seidel, Anabel Bornemann, Antje Meyer, Jürgen Kretschmer, Jens Krug, Marie-Luise Dierks","doi":"10.1007/s00103-025-04015-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient organisations are increasingly calling for a participatory approach to health research. In the \"KundiG - Klug und digital durch das Gesundheitswesen\" project, the perspective of chronically ill people was included in the development of a training programme for digital health literacy (dGK). The aim of this work is to show the personal effort involved in the participatory development of a training programme and the prerequisites for this.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During the project period (April 2021 to March 2023), a basic concept was developed by the researchers and continuously refined in a structured participatory process with regard to content, depth of topics, procedure, didactics and course materials. A participation model was created for this purpose. A formative evaluation took place as part of eight pilot courses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 people were involved in the working groups and the evaluation, including 6 from organised self-help, 3 from BARMER and 11 from the Hannover Medical School. The participatory collaboration was labour intensive and tightly scheduled, meaning that not all members were able to participate to the same extent. The result was an internet-based training programme that received positive feedback and suggestions for improvement from the participants in the pilot courses. The result was a 15-hour online course to promote dGK, a 300-page course manual and six digital, accessible booklets.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Participation meant the active involvement of all participants in the entire process, a high number of appointments, the consideration of different perspectives and a constant endeavour to reach a consensus. Prior training of the participants could be helpful in future projects. The roll-out of the programme and continuous evaluation in the context of self-help are in preparation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":"313-322"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11868200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Designing participation-promoting digital health literacy : Experiences from developing a course programme for people with chronic diseases].\",\"authors\":\"Gabriele Seidel, Anabel Bornemann, Antje Meyer, Jürgen Kretschmer, Jens Krug, Marie-Luise Dierks\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00103-025-04015-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient organisations are increasingly calling for a participatory approach to health research. In the \\\"KundiG - Klug und digital durch das Gesundheitswesen\\\" project, the perspective of chronically ill people was included in the development of a training programme for digital health literacy (dGK). The aim of this work is to show the personal effort involved in the participatory development of a training programme and the prerequisites for this.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During the project period (April 2021 to March 2023), a basic concept was developed by the researchers and continuously refined in a structured participatory process with regard to content, depth of topics, procedure, didactics and course materials. A participation model was created for this purpose. A formative evaluation took place as part of eight pilot courses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 people were involved in the working groups and the evaluation, including 6 from organised self-help, 3 from BARMER and 11 from the Hannover Medical School. The participatory collaboration was labour intensive and tightly scheduled, meaning that not all members were able to participate to the same extent. The result was an internet-based training programme that received positive feedback and suggestions for improvement from the participants in the pilot courses. The result was a 15-hour online course to promote dGK, a 300-page course manual and six digital, accessible booklets.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Participation meant the active involvement of all participants in the entire process, a high number of appointments, the consideration of different perspectives and a constant endeavour to reach a consensus. Prior training of the participants could be helpful in future projects. The roll-out of the programme and continuous evaluation in the context of self-help are in preparation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"313-322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11868200/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-025-04015-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-025-04015-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患者组织越来越多地呼吁对健康研究采取参与式方法。在“KundiG - Klug and digital durch das Gesundheitswesen”项目中,慢性病患者的观点被纳入了数字卫生知识培训方案的制定。这项工作的目的是显示参与拟订培训方案所涉及的个人努力及其先决条件。方法:在项目期间(2021年4月至2023年3月),研究人员制定了一个基本概念,并在结构化的参与式过程中不断完善内容,主题深度,程序,教学和课程材料。为此目的创建了一个参与模式。作为八个试点课程的一部分,进行了形成性评价。结果:共有20人参与了工作组和评估,其中6人来自自助组织,3人来自BARMER, 11人来自汉诺威医学院。参与式协作是劳动密集型的,时间安排很紧,这意味着并非所有成员都能以同样的程度参与。结果是一个以互联网为基础的培训计划,从试点课程的参与者那里得到了积极的反馈和改进建议。结果是一个15小时的在线课程,以推广dGK,一个300页的课程手册和6个数字,可访问的小册子。讨论:参与意味着所有参与者积极参与整个进程,任命人数众多,考虑不同的观点,并不断努力达成协商一致意见。事先对参与者的培训可能对未来的项目有所帮助。目前正在筹备方案的推广工作和在自助方面的持续评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Designing participation-promoting digital health literacy : Experiences from developing a course programme for people with chronic diseases].

Background: Patient organisations are increasingly calling for a participatory approach to health research. In the "KundiG - Klug und digital durch das Gesundheitswesen" project, the perspective of chronically ill people was included in the development of a training programme for digital health literacy (dGK). The aim of this work is to show the personal effort involved in the participatory development of a training programme and the prerequisites for this.

Methods: During the project period (April 2021 to March 2023), a basic concept was developed by the researchers and continuously refined in a structured participatory process with regard to content, depth of topics, procedure, didactics and course materials. A participation model was created for this purpose. A formative evaluation took place as part of eight pilot courses.

Results: A total of 20 people were involved in the working groups and the evaluation, including 6 from organised self-help, 3 from BARMER and 11 from the Hannover Medical School. The participatory collaboration was labour intensive and tightly scheduled, meaning that not all members were able to participate to the same extent. The result was an internet-based training programme that received positive feedback and suggestions for improvement from the participants in the pilot courses. The result was a 15-hour online course to promote dGK, a 300-page course manual and six digital, accessible booklets.

Discussion: Participation meant the active involvement of all participants in the entire process, a high number of appointments, the consideration of different perspectives and a constant endeavour to reach a consensus. Prior training of the participants could be helpful in future projects. The roll-out of the programme and continuous evaluation in the context of self-help are in preparation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Monatszeitschrift Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - umfasst alle Fragestellungen und Bereiche, mit denen sich das öffentliche Gesundheitswesen und die staatliche Gesundheitspolitik auseinandersetzen. Ziel ist es, zum einen über wesentliche Entwicklungen in der biologisch-medizinischen Grundlagenforschung auf dem Laufenden zu halten und zum anderen über konkrete Maßnahmen zum Gesundheitsschutz, über Konzepte der Prävention, Risikoabwehr und Gesundheitsförderung zu informieren. Wichtige Themengebiete sind die Epidemiologie übertragbarer und nicht übertragbarer Krankheiten, der umweltbezogene Gesundheitsschutz sowie gesundheitsökonomische, medizinethische und -rechtliche Fragestellungen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信