中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值作为乳腺癌患者治疗前后静脉血栓栓塞的预测因子的作用

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1097/MBC.0000000000001341
Alyssa Qian, Armita Zandi, Regan Bucciol, Maha Othman
{"title":"中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值作为乳腺癌患者治疗前后静脉血栓栓塞的预测因子的作用","authors":"Alyssa Qian, Armita Zandi, Regan Bucciol, Maha Othman","doi":"10.1097/MBC.0000000000001341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Breast cancer (BC) accounts for 12.3% of all cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are recognized inflammatory biomarkers but have not been incorporated into thrombosis risk stratification models. We evaluated NLR and PLR as predictive biomarkers for VTE in BC patients to determine their optimal predictive cutoffs and net predictive value before and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective pilot study that involved 56 women with BC, recruited prior to treatment (chemotherapy and immunotherapy) initiation with at least 6-month monitoring for VTE. NLR and PLR were assessed pre and posttreatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five patients (8.9%) developed VTE. NLR and PLR increased significantly posttreatment (P = 0.001). Post, not pretreatment, NLR (P = 0.029) and PLR (P = 0.033) were significantly associated with VTE occurrence. Receiver Operating curve analysis indicated enhanced predictive capacity for VTE postimmunotherapy. Optimal posttreatment cutoffs were 3.6 for NLR and 280 for PLR, aligning with existing literature, with slightly elevated NLR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Posttreatment NLR and PLR have higher predictability for VTE in patients receiving immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy. NLR outperforms PLR, particularly postimmunotherapy. This data holds promise for thrombosis risk stratification in the context of immunotherapy but requires evaluation in larger studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8992,"journal":{"name":"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis","volume":"36 2","pages":"62-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as venous thromboembolism predictors in breast cancer patients pre- and post-therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Alyssa Qian, Armita Zandi, Regan Bucciol, Maha Othman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MBC.0000000000001341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Breast cancer (BC) accounts for 12.3% of all cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are recognized inflammatory biomarkers but have not been incorporated into thrombosis risk stratification models. We evaluated NLR and PLR as predictive biomarkers for VTE in BC patients to determine their optimal predictive cutoffs and net predictive value before and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective pilot study that involved 56 women with BC, recruited prior to treatment (chemotherapy and immunotherapy) initiation with at least 6-month monitoring for VTE. NLR and PLR were assessed pre and posttreatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five patients (8.9%) developed VTE. NLR and PLR increased significantly posttreatment (P = 0.001). Post, not pretreatment, NLR (P = 0.029) and PLR (P = 0.033) were significantly associated with VTE occurrence. Receiver Operating curve analysis indicated enhanced predictive capacity for VTE postimmunotherapy. Optimal posttreatment cutoffs were 3.6 for NLR and 280 for PLR, aligning with existing literature, with slightly elevated NLR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Posttreatment NLR and PLR have higher predictability for VTE in patients receiving immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy. NLR outperforms PLR, particularly postimmunotherapy. This data holds promise for thrombosis risk stratification in the context of immunotherapy but requires evaluation in larger studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"62-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0000000000001341\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0000000000001341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:乳腺癌(BC)占所有癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的12.3%。血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)是公认的炎症生物标志物,但尚未纳入血栓形成风险分层模型。我们评估了NLR和PLR作为BC患者静脉血栓栓塞的预测生物标志物,以确定其治疗前后的最佳预测截止点和净预测值。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性先导研究,涉及56名BC女性,在治疗(化疗和免疫治疗)开始前招募,至少6个月的静脉血栓栓塞监测。评估治疗前后NLR和PLR。结果:5例(8.9%)发生静脉血栓栓塞。NLR和PLR治疗后显著升高(P = 0.001)。非预处理后,NLR (P = 0.029)和PLR (P = 0.033)与静脉血栓栓塞发生率显著相关。受试者工作曲线分析显示VTE免疫治疗后的预测能力增强。NLR和PLR的最佳后处理截止值分别为3.6和280,与现有文献一致,NLR略有升高。结论:与化疗相比,接受免疫治疗的患者治疗后NLR和PLR对静脉血栓栓塞有更高的可预测性。NLR优于PLR,特别是刺激后治疗。这一数据为免疫治疗背景下的血栓风险分层提供了希望,但需要在更大规模的研究中进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as venous thromboembolism predictors in breast cancer patients pre- and post-therapy.

Objectives: Breast cancer (BC) accounts for 12.3% of all cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are recognized inflammatory biomarkers but have not been incorporated into thrombosis risk stratification models. We evaluated NLR and PLR as predictive biomarkers for VTE in BC patients to determine their optimal predictive cutoffs and net predictive value before and after treatment.

Methods: We conducted a prospective pilot study that involved 56 women with BC, recruited prior to treatment (chemotherapy and immunotherapy) initiation with at least 6-month monitoring for VTE. NLR and PLR were assessed pre and posttreatment.

Results: Five patients (8.9%) developed VTE. NLR and PLR increased significantly posttreatment (P = 0.001). Post, not pretreatment, NLR (P = 0.029) and PLR (P = 0.033) were significantly associated with VTE occurrence. Receiver Operating curve analysis indicated enhanced predictive capacity for VTE postimmunotherapy. Optimal posttreatment cutoffs were 3.6 for NLR and 280 for PLR, aligning with existing literature, with slightly elevated NLR.

Conclusions: Posttreatment NLR and PLR have higher predictability for VTE in patients receiving immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy. NLR outperforms PLR, particularly postimmunotherapy. This data holds promise for thrombosis risk stratification in the context of immunotherapy but requires evaluation in larger studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis is an international fully refereed journal that features review and original research articles on all clinical, laboratory and experimental aspects of haemostasis and thrombosis. The journal is devoted to publishing significant developments worldwide in the field of blood coagulation, fibrinolysis, thrombosis, platelets and the kininogen-kinin system, as well as dealing with those aspects of blood rheology relevant to haemostasis and the effects of drugs on haemostatic components
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信