Tamara Zec, Denis Schmartz, Pomeline Temmerman, Jean-François Fils, Brigitte Ickx, Fanny Bonhomme, Philippe Van Der Linden
{"title":"孕妇止血的评估：HEMSTOP标准化问卷诊断性能的回顾性评估。","authors":"Tamara Zec, Denis Schmartz, Pomeline Temmerman, Jean-François Fils, Brigitte Ickx, Fanny Bonhomme, Philippe Van Der Linden","doi":"10.1097/EA9.0000000000000050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contemporary guidelines pertaining to the evaluation of bleeding risk recommend conducting a comprehensive examination of both personal and family histories concerning haemorrhagic diatheses.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We employed the standardised HEMSTOP (Hematoma, hEmorrhage, Menorrhagia, Surgery, Tooth extraction, Obstetrics, Parents) questionnaire in pregnant women to evaluate its efficacy in detecting a haemostatic disorder and predicting the risk of haemorrhage associated with delivery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-centre retrospective observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Brugmann Hospital, a tertiary university institution.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All full-term parturients who underwent vaginal or caesarean delivery in our hospital between January 2020 and December 2021 were included in the study. A total of 3588 patients were enrolled.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the HEMSTOP questionnaire in identifying individuals with an abnormal primary haemostatic profile. The secondary objective was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the HEMSTOP questionnaire in predicting postpartum haemorrhage (PPH; defined as blood loss >1000 ml). Additionally, positive-predictive values and negative-predictive values (NPVs) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The specificity and sensitivity of the HEMSTOP questionnaire to predict an abnormal standard coagulation test in pregnant women are respectively 96% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95 to 0.97] and 39% (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.61). Its NPV is 100%. The specificity and sensitivity of the HEMSTOP questionnaire to predict postpartum bleeding risk are respectively 96% (95% CI, 0.95 to 0.97) and 8% (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the conditions of our study, the HEMSTOP questionnaire enables the prediction of a primary haemostatic anomaly with a specificity and sensitivity comparable to routine haemostatic assessments. These findings concur with the recommendation against the routine prescription of laboratory tests for patients lacking a history of bleeding diathesis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trial NCT05191251.</p>","PeriodicalId":520410,"journal":{"name":"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care","volume":"3 2","pages":"e0050"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of haemostasis in pregnant women: A retrospective evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the HEMSTOP standardised questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Zec, Denis Schmartz, Pomeline Temmerman, Jean-François Fils, Brigitte Ickx, Fanny Bonhomme, Philippe Van Der Linden\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EA9.0000000000000050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contemporary guidelines pertaining to the evaluation of bleeding risk recommend conducting a comprehensive examination of both personal and family histories concerning haemorrhagic diatheses.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We employed the standardised HEMSTOP (Hematoma, hEmorrhage, Menorrhagia, Surgery, Tooth extraction, Obstetrics, Parents) questionnaire in pregnant women to evaluate its efficacy in detecting a haemostatic disorder and predicting the risk of haemorrhage associated with delivery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-centre retrospective observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Brugmann Hospital, a tertiary university institution.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All full-term parturients who underwent vaginal or caesarean delivery in our hospital between January 2020 and December 2021 were included in the study. A total of 3588 patients were enrolled.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the HEMSTOP questionnaire in identifying individuals with an abnormal primary haemostatic profile. The secondary objective was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the HEMSTOP questionnaire in predicting postpartum haemorrhage (PPH; defined as blood loss >1000 ml). Additionally, positive-predictive values and negative-predictive values (NPVs) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The specificity and sensitivity of the HEMSTOP questionnaire to predict an abnormal standard coagulation test in pregnant women are respectively 96% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95 to 0.97] and 39% (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.61). Its NPV is 100%. The specificity and sensitivity of the HEMSTOP questionnaire to predict postpartum bleeding risk are respectively 96% (95% CI, 0.95 to 0.97) and 8% (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the conditions of our study, the HEMSTOP questionnaire enables the prediction of a primary haemostatic anomaly with a specificity and sensitivity comparable to routine haemostatic assessments. These findings concur with the recommendation against the routine prescription of laboratory tests for patients lacking a history of bleeding diathesis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trial NCT05191251.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"e0050\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798394/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EA9.0000000000000050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EA9.0000000000000050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of haemostasis in pregnant women: A retrospective evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the HEMSTOP standardised questionnaire.
Background: Contemporary guidelines pertaining to the evaluation of bleeding risk recommend conducting a comprehensive examination of both personal and family histories concerning haemorrhagic diatheses.
Objectives: We employed the standardised HEMSTOP (Hematoma, hEmorrhage, Menorrhagia, Surgery, Tooth extraction, Obstetrics, Parents) questionnaire in pregnant women to evaluate its efficacy in detecting a haemostatic disorder and predicting the risk of haemorrhage associated with delivery.
Design: A single-centre retrospective observational cohort study.
Setting: Brugmann Hospital, a tertiary university institution.
Patients: All full-term parturients who underwent vaginal or caesarean delivery in our hospital between January 2020 and December 2021 were included in the study. A total of 3588 patients were enrolled.
Main outcome measures: The primary aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the HEMSTOP questionnaire in identifying individuals with an abnormal primary haemostatic profile. The secondary objective was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the HEMSTOP questionnaire in predicting postpartum haemorrhage (PPH; defined as blood loss >1000 ml). Additionally, positive-predictive values and negative-predictive values (NPVs) were calculated.
Results: The specificity and sensitivity of the HEMSTOP questionnaire to predict an abnormal standard coagulation test in pregnant women are respectively 96% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95 to 0.97] and 39% (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.61). Its NPV is 100%. The specificity and sensitivity of the HEMSTOP questionnaire to predict postpartum bleeding risk are respectively 96% (95% CI, 0.95 to 0.97) and 8% (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.11).
Conclusion: In the conditions of our study, the HEMSTOP questionnaire enables the prediction of a primary haemostatic anomaly with a specificity and sensitivity comparable to routine haemostatic assessments. These findings concur with the recommendation against the routine prescription of laboratory tests for patients lacking a history of bleeding diathesis.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
