{"title":"构建角度对3D打印定制托盘树脂样品力学性能的影响。","authors":"Fatma Uslu Kavrama, Nazli Aydin, Halit Yosuncigir, Yurdanur Ucar","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of build angle on the flexural strength (FS), elastic modulus (E), and hardness (VH) of stereolithography (SLA) based 3D-printed custom tray resin.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>3D-printed specimens with dimensions of 65.0 mm × 10.0 mm × 3.3 mm ± 0.2 mm were manufactured with different build angles (90, 120, 135, 150, 180 degrees) using custom tray resin. For preparing the specimens in the control groups, the autopolymerizing (AP) resin and the ultraviolet polymerizing (UV) resin were used. FS and E were determined by a three-point bending test, and hardness was evaluated with the VH test. Fracture surfaces were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Statistical analysis of the data was made using a one way ANOVA followed by the Dunnett T3 test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Considering all parameters, the UV group was statistically significantly lower than the other groups. The mean E value of the 90D group was statistically significantly different than those of the 150D group (P=.000) and the 180D group (P=.002). The mean E value of the 120D group was statistically significantly different than those of the 150D group (P=.003) and the 180D group (P=.013). The AP group showed a higher mean VH number (20.20 ±2.08), and the difference was statistically significant compared to the 3D-printed groups (P<.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering its mechanical properties, it was appropriate to arrange the build angles to different degrees when manufacturing reliable custom trays using SLA. 3D printed custom tray production method was a more standard method compared to AP and UV.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Build Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D- Printed Custom Tray Resin Specimens.\",\"authors\":\"Fatma Uslu Kavrama, Nazli Aydin, Halit Yosuncigir, Yurdanur Ucar\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.9052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of build angle on the flexural strength (FS), elastic modulus (E), and hardness (VH) of stereolithography (SLA) based 3D-printed custom tray resin.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>3D-printed specimens with dimensions of 65.0 mm × 10.0 mm × 3.3 mm ± 0.2 mm were manufactured with different build angles (90, 120, 135, 150, 180 degrees) using custom tray resin. For preparing the specimens in the control groups, the autopolymerizing (AP) resin and the ultraviolet polymerizing (UV) resin were used. FS and E were determined by a three-point bending test, and hardness was evaluated with the VH test. Fracture surfaces were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Statistical analysis of the data was made using a one way ANOVA followed by the Dunnett T3 test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Considering all parameters, the UV group was statistically significantly lower than the other groups. The mean E value of the 90D group was statistically significantly different than those of the 150D group (P=.000) and the 180D group (P=.002). The mean E value of the 120D group was statistically significantly different than those of the 150D group (P=.003) and the 180D group (P=.013). The AP group showed a higher mean VH number (20.20 ±2.08), and the difference was statistically significant compared to the 3D-printed groups (P<.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering its mechanical properties, it was appropriate to arrange the build angles to different degrees when manufacturing reliable custom trays using SLA. 3D printed custom tray production method was a more standard method compared to AP and UV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:通过体外实验,研究构建角度对基于立体光刻(SLA)的3d打印定制托盘树脂抗弯强度(FS)、弹性模量(E)和硬度(VH)的影响。材料与方法:采用定制托盘树脂制作尺寸为65.0 mm × 10.0 mm × 3.3 mm±0.2 mm的3d打印样品,不同的构建角度(90度、120度、135度、150度、180度)。对照组标本的制备采用自聚合树脂(AP)和紫外聚合树脂(UV)。FS和E通过三点弯曲试验确定,硬度通过VH试验评估。用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对断口表面进行了评估。采用单因素方差分析和Dunnett T3检验对数据进行统计分析。结果:综合各项指标,UV组明显低于其他各组。90D组的平均E值与150D组(P= 0.000)、180D组(P= 0.002)比较,差异有统计学意义。120D组的平均E值与150D组(P= 0.003)、180D组(P= 0.013)比较,差异有统计学意义。AP组的平均VH数(20.20±2.08)高于3d打印组,差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:考虑到其力学性能,采用SLA制造可靠的定制托盘时,可适当安排不同程度的构建角度。与AP和UV相比,3D打印定制托盘制作方法是一种更标准的方法。
The Effect of Build Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D- Printed Custom Tray Resin Specimens.
Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of build angle on the flexural strength (FS), elastic modulus (E), and hardness (VH) of stereolithography (SLA) based 3D-printed custom tray resin.
Material and methods: 3D-printed specimens with dimensions of 65.0 mm × 10.0 mm × 3.3 mm ± 0.2 mm were manufactured with different build angles (90, 120, 135, 150, 180 degrees) using custom tray resin. For preparing the specimens in the control groups, the autopolymerizing (AP) resin and the ultraviolet polymerizing (UV) resin were used. FS and E were determined by a three-point bending test, and hardness was evaluated with the VH test. Fracture surfaces were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Statistical analysis of the data was made using a one way ANOVA followed by the Dunnett T3 test.
Results: Considering all parameters, the UV group was statistically significantly lower than the other groups. The mean E value of the 90D group was statistically significantly different than those of the 150D group (P=.000) and the 180D group (P=.002). The mean E value of the 120D group was statistically significantly different than those of the 150D group (P=.003) and the 180D group (P=.013). The AP group showed a higher mean VH number (20.20 ±2.08), and the difference was statistically significant compared to the 3D-printed groups (P<.005).
Conclusions: Considering its mechanical properties, it was appropriate to arrange the build angles to different degrees when manufacturing reliable custom trays using SLA. 3D printed custom tray production method was a more standard method compared to AP and UV.