Aldo Hanel, Louis B Nottingham, Robert J Orpet, Richard Hilton, Tobin D Northfield, Rebecca Schmidt-Jeffris
{"title":"评价在温带果树作物中增加土蜈蚣捕获的诱捕方法。","authors":"Aldo Hanel, Louis B Nottingham, Robert J Orpet, Richard Hilton, Tobin D Northfield, Rebecca Schmidt-Jeffris","doi":"10.1093/jee/toaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The European earwig, Forficula auricularia L. (sensu lato), has a dual role in temperate tree fruit crops-a pest of stone fruit and a predator of key pests in pome fruit. Some growers trap earwigs in crops where they are pests, subsequently releasing them in pome fruit as an augmentative biological control strategy. Effective earwig monitoring and trapping are critical for understanding their biological control potential in orchards. Traps made of rolled, corrugated cardboard have long been used for earwig monitoring; however, no standardized studies have investigated improvements to them. In a series of trials, we explore options to improve traps by testing different trap materials, sizes, positioning on the tree, and time in the field, in addition to the lures and baits. We found that cardboard traps had higher earwig catch than black or translucent plastic traps. There were diminishing returns in earwig capture for increased trap length, plateauing at ~30 cm. Traps placed on the main trunk captured more earwigs than traps on the base or near the end of branches. Lures and baits mostly did not increase trap efficacy, except fish sauce which inconsistently increased earwig captures. The use of plastic bottles to contain the cardboard traps greatly reduced trap catch. Finally, we found evidence that traps left in the field for longer periods of time can increase earwig capture, possibly due to the accumulation of earwig aggregation pheromone. Overall, the standard unbaited corrugated cardboard trap was the most effective and practical earwig monitoring trap.</p>","PeriodicalId":94077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economic entomology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating trapping methods to increase earwig capture in temperate tree fruit crops.\",\"authors\":\"Aldo Hanel, Louis B Nottingham, Robert J Orpet, Richard Hilton, Tobin D Northfield, Rebecca Schmidt-Jeffris\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jee/toaf018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The European earwig, Forficula auricularia L. (sensu lato), has a dual role in temperate tree fruit crops-a pest of stone fruit and a predator of key pests in pome fruit. Some growers trap earwigs in crops where they are pests, subsequently releasing them in pome fruit as an augmentative biological control strategy. Effective earwig monitoring and trapping are critical for understanding their biological control potential in orchards. Traps made of rolled, corrugated cardboard have long been used for earwig monitoring; however, no standardized studies have investigated improvements to them. In a series of trials, we explore options to improve traps by testing different trap materials, sizes, positioning on the tree, and time in the field, in addition to the lures and baits. We found that cardboard traps had higher earwig catch than black or translucent plastic traps. There were diminishing returns in earwig capture for increased trap length, plateauing at ~30 cm. Traps placed on the main trunk captured more earwigs than traps on the base or near the end of branches. Lures and baits mostly did not increase trap efficacy, except fish sauce which inconsistently increased earwig captures. The use of plastic bottles to contain the cardboard traps greatly reduced trap catch. Finally, we found evidence that traps left in the field for longer periods of time can increase earwig capture, possibly due to the accumulation of earwig aggregation pheromone. Overall, the standard unbaited corrugated cardboard trap was the most effective and practical earwig monitoring trap.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of economic entomology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of economic entomology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaf018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economic entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaf018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
欧洲蠼螋Forficula auricularia L. (sensu lato)在温带果树作物中具有双重作用:一是核果害虫,二是梨果主要害虫的捕食者。一些种植者在害虫作物中捕获蠼螋,随后将其释放到梨果中,作为一种增强的生物控制策略。有效地监测和诱捕土蜈蚣是了解其在果园生物防治潜力的关键。用瓦楞纸板制成的捕鼠器长期以来一直用于监测地蜈蚣;然而,没有标准化的研究调查了它们的改进。在一系列试验中,除了诱饵和饵外,我们还通过测试不同的陷阱材料、大小、在树上的位置和在田间的时间来探索改进陷阱的选择。我们发现纸板陷阱比黑色或半透明的塑料陷阱捕捉到更多的蠼螋。圈套长度越长,捕获土蜈蚣的收益越小,在~30 cm处趋于稳定。放置在主干上的陷阱比放置在基部或靠近树枝末端的陷阱捕获更多的地蜈蚣。除鱼露不一致地增加了土蜈蚣的捕获量外,引诱物和诱饵大多不能提高诱捕器的效果。使用塑料瓶来装纸板捕集器大大减少了捕集器的捕获量。最后,我们发现有证据表明,在野外放置较长时间的陷阱可以增加对土蜈蚣的捕获,这可能是由于土蜈蚣聚集信息素的积累。总体而言,标准无饵瓦楞纸板捕鼠器是最有效和实用的地蜈蚣监测捕鼠器。
Evaluating trapping methods to increase earwig capture in temperate tree fruit crops.
The European earwig, Forficula auricularia L. (sensu lato), has a dual role in temperate tree fruit crops-a pest of stone fruit and a predator of key pests in pome fruit. Some growers trap earwigs in crops where they are pests, subsequently releasing them in pome fruit as an augmentative biological control strategy. Effective earwig monitoring and trapping are critical for understanding their biological control potential in orchards. Traps made of rolled, corrugated cardboard have long been used for earwig monitoring; however, no standardized studies have investigated improvements to them. In a series of trials, we explore options to improve traps by testing different trap materials, sizes, positioning on the tree, and time in the field, in addition to the lures and baits. We found that cardboard traps had higher earwig catch than black or translucent plastic traps. There were diminishing returns in earwig capture for increased trap length, plateauing at ~30 cm. Traps placed on the main trunk captured more earwigs than traps on the base or near the end of branches. Lures and baits mostly did not increase trap efficacy, except fish sauce which inconsistently increased earwig captures. The use of plastic bottles to contain the cardboard traps greatly reduced trap catch. Finally, we found evidence that traps left in the field for longer periods of time can increase earwig capture, possibly due to the accumulation of earwig aggregation pheromone. Overall, the standard unbaited corrugated cardboard trap was the most effective and practical earwig monitoring trap.