Ana María Espinoza, Patricio A Leyton, Marcia Robles, Javiera Vargas, Loreto A Muñoz
{"title":"连续周围神经阻滞用于骨科手术后疼痛控制:一项住院和门诊护理的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Ana María Espinoza, Patricio A Leyton, Marcia Robles, Javiera Vargas, Loreto A Muñoz","doi":"10.1097/EA9.0000000000000067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNB) provide an opioid-free alternative for pain control after orthopaedic surgery. However, postdischarge ambulatory patient care and follow-up concerns have prevented CPNB use at home.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To address physicians' concerns about the outpatient use of CPNB.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, cohort, observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single centre, teaching private hospital in Santiago, Chile, between July 2016 and March 2020.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We included patients aged at least 18 who underwent orthopaedic surgery using CPNB for postoperative pain management. Patients scheduled simultaneously for non-orthopedic surgery on the same event were excluded.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Pain scores, opioid use, and complication rates at both in-hospital and at-home sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CPNB were provided as an analgesia plan in 497 patients who met inclusion criteria, and 387 (77.87%) were discharged home with this continuous analgesia. At 48 h, 70% of the patients reported no-worse-than-mild pain. Less than 3.1% of patients reported an episode of severe pain, and less than 13% of the patients required opioid rescue medication. Transient neurological symptoms were observed in 13% (95% confidence interval (CI), 10.4 to 16.1) of the patients. No long-term or severe complications were observed. High rates of satisfaction were reached among patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In-hospital and at-home use of CPNB supervised by a pain service team provides a feasible and safe alternative after orthopaedic surgery, pain control with a low requirement of opioids.</p>","PeriodicalId":520410,"journal":{"name":"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care","volume":"4 1","pages":"e0067"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous peripheral nerve blocks for pain control after orthopaedic surgery: A prospective study during in-hospital and ambulatory care.\",\"authors\":\"Ana María Espinoza, Patricio A Leyton, Marcia Robles, Javiera Vargas, Loreto A Muñoz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EA9.0000000000000067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNB) provide an opioid-free alternative for pain control after orthopaedic surgery. However, postdischarge ambulatory patient care and follow-up concerns have prevented CPNB use at home.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To address physicians' concerns about the outpatient use of CPNB.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, cohort, observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single centre, teaching private hospital in Santiago, Chile, between July 2016 and March 2020.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We included patients aged at least 18 who underwent orthopaedic surgery using CPNB for postoperative pain management. Patients scheduled simultaneously for non-orthopedic surgery on the same event were excluded.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Pain scores, opioid use, and complication rates at both in-hospital and at-home sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CPNB were provided as an analgesia plan in 497 patients who met inclusion criteria, and 387 (77.87%) were discharged home with this continuous analgesia. At 48 h, 70% of the patients reported no-worse-than-mild pain. Less than 3.1% of patients reported an episode of severe pain, and less than 13% of the patients required opioid rescue medication. Transient neurological symptoms were observed in 13% (95% confidence interval (CI), 10.4 to 16.1) of the patients. No long-term or severe complications were observed. High rates of satisfaction were reached among patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In-hospital and at-home use of CPNB supervised by a pain service team provides a feasible and safe alternative after orthopaedic surgery, pain control with a low requirement of opioids.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"e0067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798377/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EA9.0000000000000067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EA9.0000000000000067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Continuous peripheral nerve blocks for pain control after orthopaedic surgery: A prospective study during in-hospital and ambulatory care.
Background: Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNB) provide an opioid-free alternative for pain control after orthopaedic surgery. However, postdischarge ambulatory patient care and follow-up concerns have prevented CPNB use at home.
Objective: To address physicians' concerns about the outpatient use of CPNB.
Design: Prospective, cohort, observational study.
Setting: Single centre, teaching private hospital in Santiago, Chile, between July 2016 and March 2020.
Patients: We included patients aged at least 18 who underwent orthopaedic surgery using CPNB for postoperative pain management. Patients scheduled simultaneously for non-orthopedic surgery on the same event were excluded.
Main outcome measures: Pain scores, opioid use, and complication rates at both in-hospital and at-home sites.
Results: CPNB were provided as an analgesia plan in 497 patients who met inclusion criteria, and 387 (77.87%) were discharged home with this continuous analgesia. At 48 h, 70% of the patients reported no-worse-than-mild pain. Less than 3.1% of patients reported an episode of severe pain, and less than 13% of the patients required opioid rescue medication. Transient neurological symptoms were observed in 13% (95% confidence interval (CI), 10.4 to 16.1) of the patients. No long-term or severe complications were observed. High rates of satisfaction were reached among patients.
Conclusion: In-hospital and at-home use of CPNB supervised by a pain service team provides a feasible and safe alternative after orthopaedic surgery, pain control with a low requirement of opioids.