{"title":"常规锉与旋转锉在初生磨牙根管预备中的体积分析比较——体外研究。","authors":"Satish Vishwanathaiah","doi":"10.3389/fdmed.2024.1489074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare and evaluate the efficacy of canal preparation and volumetric filling of primary molars instrumented by conventional hand K-file, ProAF baby rotary file and Kedo-S square file using cone beam computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty freshly extracted human primary second molars were randomly divided into 3 groups of 10 teeth each. After access opening and working length determination, preoperative volume analysis was done using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The canals were then instrumented by either hand K-files, Pro AF Baby rotary files and Kedo-S square rotary files. Post operative volume analysis was performed using CBCT. All the canals were obturated using Metapex and scanned again using CBCT. Mean values of the pre- and post-operative canal volumes were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Inter- and intra- group volumetric changes were analyzed statistically by <i>post hoc</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference in volume after canal preparation and obturation was the highest in the hand K-file group, followed by Pro AF Baby Gold group and the least in the Kedo-S square group. Inter and intra group comparison showed statistically significant differences for all the file groups used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Kedo- S square showed the least difference in preparation volume and better obturating volume compared to Pro AF baby gold file systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":73077,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in dental medicine","volume":"5 ","pages":"1489074"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11797926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of volumetric analysis between conventional and rotary files in the preparation of root canals in primary molars-an <i>in vitro</i> study.\",\"authors\":\"Satish Vishwanathaiah\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fdmed.2024.1489074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare and evaluate the efficacy of canal preparation and volumetric filling of primary molars instrumented by conventional hand K-file, ProAF baby rotary file and Kedo-S square file using cone beam computed tomography.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty freshly extracted human primary second molars were randomly divided into 3 groups of 10 teeth each. After access opening and working length determination, preoperative volume analysis was done using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The canals were then instrumented by either hand K-files, Pro AF Baby rotary files and Kedo-S square rotary files. Post operative volume analysis was performed using CBCT. All the canals were obturated using Metapex and scanned again using CBCT. Mean values of the pre- and post-operative canal volumes were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Inter- and intra- group volumetric changes were analyzed statistically by <i>post hoc</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean difference in volume after canal preparation and obturation was the highest in the hand K-file group, followed by Pro AF Baby Gold group and the least in the Kedo-S square group. Inter and intra group comparison showed statistically significant differences for all the file groups used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Kedo- S square showed the least difference in preparation volume and better obturating volume compared to Pro AF baby gold file systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in dental medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1489074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11797926/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in dental medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2024.1489074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in dental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2024.1489074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:比较和评价传统手工k锉、ProAF婴儿旋转锉和Kedo-S方形锉在锥体束计算机断层扫描中对初生磨牙根管预备和体积填充的效果。材料与方法:30颗刚拔除的人乳牙第二磨牙随机分为3组,每组10颗。在通道开放和工作长度确定后,使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)进行术前体积分析。然后用手k -锉、Pro AF Baby旋转锉和Kedo-S方形旋转锉对管进行仪器测量。术后体积分析采用CBCT。使用Metapex封闭所有管道,并再次使用CBCT扫描。术前和术后椎管体积的平均值采用单因素方差分析。组间和组内体积变化采用事后检验进行统计学分析。结果:手工k锉组预备和封闭后的平均容积差最大,Pro AF Baby Gold组次之,Kedo-S方组最小。组间和组内比较显示所有使用的文件组有统计学上的显著差异。结论:与Pro AF婴儿金文件系统相比,Kedo- S方在制备体积上差异最小,在封闭体积上有更好的表现。
Comparison of volumetric analysis between conventional and rotary files in the preparation of root canals in primary molars-an in vitro study.
Background: To compare and evaluate the efficacy of canal preparation and volumetric filling of primary molars instrumented by conventional hand K-file, ProAF baby rotary file and Kedo-S square file using cone beam computed tomography.
Materials and methods: Thirty freshly extracted human primary second molars were randomly divided into 3 groups of 10 teeth each. After access opening and working length determination, preoperative volume analysis was done using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The canals were then instrumented by either hand K-files, Pro AF Baby rotary files and Kedo-S square rotary files. Post operative volume analysis was performed using CBCT. All the canals were obturated using Metapex and scanned again using CBCT. Mean values of the pre- and post-operative canal volumes were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Inter- and intra- group volumetric changes were analyzed statistically by post hoc test.
Results: The mean difference in volume after canal preparation and obturation was the highest in the hand K-file group, followed by Pro AF Baby Gold group and the least in the Kedo-S square group. Inter and intra group comparison showed statistically significant differences for all the file groups used.
Conclusion: Kedo- S square showed the least difference in preparation volume and better obturating volume compared to Pro AF baby gold file systems.