Shoukat Ali Arain, Shahid Akhtar Akhund, Muhammad Abrar Barakzai, Sultan Ayoub Meo
{"title":"转变医学教育:利用大型语言模型来加强PBL——一项概念验证研究。","authors":"Shoukat Ali Arain, Shahid Akhtar Akhund, Muhammad Abrar Barakzai, Sultan Ayoub Meo","doi":"10.1152/advan.00209.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The alignment of learning materials with learning objectives (LOs) is critical for successfully implementing the problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum. This study investigated the capabilities of Gemini Advanced, a large language model (LLM), in creating clinical vignettes that align with LOs and comprehensive tutor guides. This study used a faculty-written clinical vignette about diabetes mellitus for third-year medical students. We submitted the LOs and the associated clinical vignette and tutor guide to the LLM to evaluate their alignment and generate new versions. Four faculty members compared both versions, using a structured questionnaire. The mean evaluation scores for original and LLM-generated versions are reported. The LLM identified new triggers for the clinical vignette to align it better with the LOs. Moreover, it restructured the tutor guide for better organization and flow and included thought-provoking questions. The medical information provided by the LLM was scientifically appropriate and accurate. The LLM-generated clinical vignette scored higher (3.0 vs. 1.25) for alignment with the LOs. However, the original version scored better for being educational level-appropriate (2.25 vs. 1.25) and adhering to PBL design (2.50 vs. 1.25). The LLM-generated tutor guide scored higher for better flow (3.0 vs. 1.25), comprehensive and relevant content (2.75 vs. 1.50), and thought-provoking questions (2.25 vs. 1.75). However, LLM-generated learning material lacked visual elements. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that Gemini could align and improve PBL learning materials. By leveraging the potential of LLMs while acknowledging their limitations, medical educators can create innovative and effective learning experiences for future physicians.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study evaluated a large language model (LLM) (Gemini Advanced) for creating aligned problem-based learning (PBL) materials. The LLM improved the alignment of the clinical vignette with learning goals. The LLM also restructured the tutor guide and added thought-provoking questions. The LLM guide was well organized and informative, but the original vignette was considered more educational level-appropriate. Although the LLM could not generate visuals, AI can improve PBL materials, especially when combined with human expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":"398-404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transforming medical education: leveraging large language models to enhance PBL-a proof-of-concept study.\",\"authors\":\"Shoukat Ali Arain, Shahid Akhtar Akhund, Muhammad Abrar Barakzai, Sultan Ayoub Meo\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/advan.00209.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The alignment of learning materials with learning objectives (LOs) is critical for successfully implementing the problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum. This study investigated the capabilities of Gemini Advanced, a large language model (LLM), in creating clinical vignettes that align with LOs and comprehensive tutor guides. This study used a faculty-written clinical vignette about diabetes mellitus for third-year medical students. We submitted the LOs and the associated clinical vignette and tutor guide to the LLM to evaluate their alignment and generate new versions. Four faculty members compared both versions, using a structured questionnaire. The mean evaluation scores for original and LLM-generated versions are reported. The LLM identified new triggers for the clinical vignette to align it better with the LOs. Moreover, it restructured the tutor guide for better organization and flow and included thought-provoking questions. The medical information provided by the LLM was scientifically appropriate and accurate. The LLM-generated clinical vignette scored higher (3.0 vs. 1.25) for alignment with the LOs. However, the original version scored better for being educational level-appropriate (2.25 vs. 1.25) and adhering to PBL design (2.50 vs. 1.25). The LLM-generated tutor guide scored higher for better flow (3.0 vs. 1.25), comprehensive and relevant content (2.75 vs. 1.50), and thought-provoking questions (2.25 vs. 1.75). However, LLM-generated learning material lacked visual elements. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that Gemini could align and improve PBL learning materials. By leveraging the potential of LLMs while acknowledging their limitations, medical educators can create innovative and effective learning experiences for future physicians.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study evaluated a large language model (LLM) (Gemini Advanced) for creating aligned problem-based learning (PBL) materials. The LLM improved the alignment of the clinical vignette with learning goals. The LLM also restructured the tutor guide and added thought-provoking questions. The LLM guide was well organized and informative, but the original vignette was considered more educational level-appropriate. Although the LLM could not generate visuals, AI can improve PBL materials, especially when combined with human expertise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"398-404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00209.2024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00209.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
学习材料与学习目标(LOs)的一致性对于成功实施基于问题的学习(PBL)课程至关重要。本研究调查了Gemini Advanced,一个大型语言模型(LLM)在创建与LOs一致的临床小故事和综合导师指南方面的能力。本研究采用教师撰写的关于三年级医学生糖尿病的临床小短文。我们向法学硕士提交了LOs和相关的临床插图和导师指南,以评估其对齐并生成新版本。四名教员使用结构化问卷比较了两种版本。报告了原始版本和法学硕士生成版本的平均评估分数。LLM确定了临床小插曲的新触发因素,使其更好地与LOs保持一致。此外,它重组了导师指南,以更好地组织和流程,并包括发人深省的问题。法学硕士提供的医学信息在科学上是恰当和准确的。llm生成的临床影像在与LOs对齐方面得分更高(3.0比1.25)。然而,原始版本在教育水平合适(2.25 vs. 1.25)和坚持PBL设计(2.50 vs. 1.25)方面得分更高。llm生成的导师指南在更好的流程(3.0比1.25),全面和相关的内容(2.75比1.50)和发人深省的问题(2.25比1.75)方面得分更高。然而,llm生成的学习材料缺乏视觉元素。综上所述,本研究表明双子座可以调整和改进PBL学习材料。通过充分利用法学硕士的潜力,同时承认其局限性,医学教育者可以为未来的医生创造创新和有效的学习体验。
Transforming medical education: leveraging large language models to enhance PBL-a proof-of-concept study.
The alignment of learning materials with learning objectives (LOs) is critical for successfully implementing the problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum. This study investigated the capabilities of Gemini Advanced, a large language model (LLM), in creating clinical vignettes that align with LOs and comprehensive tutor guides. This study used a faculty-written clinical vignette about diabetes mellitus for third-year medical students. We submitted the LOs and the associated clinical vignette and tutor guide to the LLM to evaluate their alignment and generate new versions. Four faculty members compared both versions, using a structured questionnaire. The mean evaluation scores for original and LLM-generated versions are reported. The LLM identified new triggers for the clinical vignette to align it better with the LOs. Moreover, it restructured the tutor guide for better organization and flow and included thought-provoking questions. The medical information provided by the LLM was scientifically appropriate and accurate. The LLM-generated clinical vignette scored higher (3.0 vs. 1.25) for alignment with the LOs. However, the original version scored better for being educational level-appropriate (2.25 vs. 1.25) and adhering to PBL design (2.50 vs. 1.25). The LLM-generated tutor guide scored higher for better flow (3.0 vs. 1.25), comprehensive and relevant content (2.75 vs. 1.50), and thought-provoking questions (2.25 vs. 1.75). However, LLM-generated learning material lacked visual elements. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that Gemini could align and improve PBL learning materials. By leveraging the potential of LLMs while acknowledging their limitations, medical educators can create innovative and effective learning experiences for future physicians.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study evaluated a large language model (LLM) (Gemini Advanced) for creating aligned problem-based learning (PBL) materials. The LLM improved the alignment of the clinical vignette with learning goals. The LLM also restructured the tutor guide and added thought-provoking questions. The LLM guide was well organized and informative, but the original vignette was considered more educational level-appropriate. Although the LLM could not generate visuals, AI can improve PBL materials, especially when combined with human expertise.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.