Mikkel T Olsen, Alexandros L Liarakos, Emma G Wilmot, Ketan Dhatariya, Hood Thabit, David Sánchez-García, Kirsten Nørgaard, Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard, Katrine B Hansen, Roman Vangoitsenhoven, Chantal Mathieu, Peter L Kristensen, Julia K Mader
{"title":"基于住院患者持续血糖监测的糖尿病管理的实施策略:系统综述。","authors":"Mikkel T Olsen, Alexandros L Liarakos, Emma G Wilmot, Ketan Dhatariya, Hood Thabit, David Sánchez-García, Kirsten Nørgaard, Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard, Katrine B Hansen, Roman Vangoitsenhoven, Chantal Mathieu, Peter L Kristensen, Julia K Mader","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides real-time glucose data that has revolutionized outpatient diabetes care; however, its impact on inpatient care remains limited, likely due to the lack of standardized CGM-based insulin titration protocols, implementation strategies, and proper familiarity with the technology, among others.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted on October 15, 2024, using PubMed and Embase, without a restriction on publication date. The search focused on CGM-based insulin titration protocols and related implementation strategies in non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) settings. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (RD42024596819).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7625 references were screened. Nine protocols for inpatient CGM-based insulin titration and related implementation strategies were identified. Six protocols recommended a weight-based basal-bolus insulin regimen. Insulin titration on basal and bolus insulin was mostly done daily based on either clinical discretion or clearly defined insulin titration protocols. All protocols employed a hybrid approach, utilizing both CGM and finger prick glucose testing to guide glucose management. Diabetes-trained staff oversaw CGM-based insulin titration and glucose management in 5 protocols. CGM alarm settings varied widely, with hyperglycemic alarm thresholds between >13.9 and >22.2 mmol/L and hypoglycemia alarm thresholds between <3.9 and <5.0 mmol/L.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed considerable variation in the detail and clarity provided by the reviewed protocols. This highlights the need for standardized operational protocols for CGM-based insulin titration and related implementation strategies to implement CGM effectively in non-ICU settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"e2411-e2419"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation Strategies for Inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitoring-based Diabetes Management: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Mikkel T Olsen, Alexandros L Liarakos, Emma G Wilmot, Ketan Dhatariya, Hood Thabit, David Sánchez-García, Kirsten Nørgaard, Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard, Katrine B Hansen, Roman Vangoitsenhoven, Chantal Mathieu, Peter L Kristensen, Julia K Mader\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/clinem/dgaf074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides real-time glucose data that has revolutionized outpatient diabetes care; however, its impact on inpatient care remains limited, likely due to the lack of standardized CGM-based insulin titration protocols, implementation strategies, and proper familiarity with the technology, among others.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted on October 15, 2024, using PubMed and Embase, without a restriction on publication date. The search focused on CGM-based insulin titration protocols and related implementation strategies in non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) settings. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (RD42024596819).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7625 references were screened. Nine protocols for inpatient CGM-based insulin titration and related implementation strategies were identified. Six protocols recommended a weight-based basal-bolus insulin regimen. Insulin titration on basal and bolus insulin was mostly done daily based on either clinical discretion or clearly defined insulin titration protocols. All protocols employed a hybrid approach, utilizing both CGM and finger prick glucose testing to guide glucose management. Diabetes-trained staff oversaw CGM-based insulin titration and glucose management in 5 protocols. CGM alarm settings varied widely, with hyperglycemic alarm thresholds between >13.9 and >22.2 mmol/L and hypoglycemia alarm thresholds between <3.9 and <5.0 mmol/L.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed considerable variation in the detail and clarity provided by the reviewed protocols. This highlights the need for standardized operational protocols for CGM-based insulin titration and related implementation strategies to implement CGM effectively in non-ICU settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e2411-e2419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf074\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation Strategies for Inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitoring-based Diabetes Management: A Systematic Review.
Introduction: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides real-time glucose data that has revolutionized outpatient diabetes care; however, its impact on inpatient care remains limited, likely due to the lack of standardized CGM-based insulin titration protocols, implementation strategies, and proper familiarity with the technology, among others.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on October 15, 2024, using PubMed and Embase, without a restriction on publication date. The search focused on CGM-based insulin titration protocols and related implementation strategies in non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) settings. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (RD42024596819).
Results: A total of 7625 references were screened. Nine protocols for inpatient CGM-based insulin titration and related implementation strategies were identified. Six protocols recommended a weight-based basal-bolus insulin regimen. Insulin titration on basal and bolus insulin was mostly done daily based on either clinical discretion or clearly defined insulin titration protocols. All protocols employed a hybrid approach, utilizing both CGM and finger prick glucose testing to guide glucose management. Diabetes-trained staff oversaw CGM-based insulin titration and glucose management in 5 protocols. CGM alarm settings varied widely, with hyperglycemic alarm thresholds between >13.9 and >22.2 mmol/L and hypoglycemia alarm thresholds between <3.9 and <5.0 mmol/L.
Conclusion: We observed considerable variation in the detail and clarity provided by the reviewed protocols. This highlights the need for standardized operational protocols for CGM-based insulin titration and related implementation strategies to implement CGM effectively in non-ICU settings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.