战斗而不是逃跑:寄生虫驱使细菌进化抵抗,而不是逃跑。

IF 2.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
American Naturalist Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1086/733414
Michael Blazanin, Jeremy Moore, Sydney Olsen, Michael Travisano
{"title":"战斗而不是逃跑:寄生虫驱使细菌进化抵抗,而不是逃跑。","authors":"Michael Blazanin, Jeremy Moore, Sydney Olsen, Michael Travisano","doi":"10.1086/733414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractIn the face of ubiquitous threats from parasites, hosts can evolve strategies to resist infection or to altogether avoid parasitism, for instance by avoiding behavior that could expose them to parasites or by dispersing away from local parasite threats. At the microbial scale, bacteria frequently encounter viral parasites, bacteriophages. While bacteria are known to utilize a number of strategies to resist infection by phages and can have the capacity to avoid moving toward phage-infected cells, it is unknown whether bacteria can evolve dispersal to escape from phages. To answer this question, we combined experimental evolution and mathematical modeling. Experimental evolution of the bacterium <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> in environments with differing spatial distributions of the phage Phi2 revealed that the host bacteria evolved resistance depending on parasite distribution but did not evolve dispersal to escape parasite infection. Simulations using parameterized mathematical models of bacterial growth and swimming motility showed that this is a general finding: while increased dispersal is adaptive in the absence of parasites, in the presence of parasites that fitness benefit disappears and resistance becomes adaptive, regardless of the spatial distribution of parasites. Together, these experiments suggest that parasites should rarely, if ever, drive the evolution of bacterial escape via dispersal.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"205 2","pages":"125-136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fight Not Flight: Parasites Drive the Bacterial Evolution of Resistance, Not Escape.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Blazanin, Jeremy Moore, Sydney Olsen, Michael Travisano\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/733414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>AbstractIn the face of ubiquitous threats from parasites, hosts can evolve strategies to resist infection or to altogether avoid parasitism, for instance by avoiding behavior that could expose them to parasites or by dispersing away from local parasite threats. At the microbial scale, bacteria frequently encounter viral parasites, bacteriophages. While bacteria are known to utilize a number of strategies to resist infection by phages and can have the capacity to avoid moving toward phage-infected cells, it is unknown whether bacteria can evolve dispersal to escape from phages. To answer this question, we combined experimental evolution and mathematical modeling. Experimental evolution of the bacterium <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i> in environments with differing spatial distributions of the phage Phi2 revealed that the host bacteria evolved resistance depending on parasite distribution but did not evolve dispersal to escape parasite infection. Simulations using parameterized mathematical models of bacterial growth and swimming motility showed that this is a general finding: while increased dispersal is adaptive in the absence of parasites, in the presence of parasites that fitness benefit disappears and resistance becomes adaptive, regardless of the spatial distribution of parasites. Together, these experiments suggest that parasites should rarely, if ever, drive the evolution of bacterial escape via dispersal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Naturalist\",\"volume\":\"205 2\",\"pages\":\"125-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Naturalist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/733414\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/733414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面对无处不在的寄生虫威胁,宿主可以进化出抵抗感染或完全避免寄生的策略,例如通过避免可能使其暴露于寄生虫的行为或通过分散远离当地寄生虫威胁。在微生物层面,细菌经常遇到病毒寄生虫、噬菌体。虽然已知细菌利用许多策略来抵抗噬菌体的感染,并且可以有能力避免向噬菌体感染的细胞移动,但尚不清楚细菌是否可以进化扩散以逃离噬菌体。为了回答这个问题,我们将实验进化和数学建模相结合。荧光假单胞菌在不同噬菌体Phi2空间分布环境中的实验进化表明,宿主细菌根据寄生虫的分布进化出耐药性,但没有进化出分散以逃避寄生虫感染。利用细菌生长和游动运动的参数化数学模型进行的模拟表明,这是一个普遍的发现:尽管在没有寄生虫的情况下,增加的扩散是适应性的,但在寄生虫存在的情况下,无论寄生虫的空间分布如何,适应性利益都会消失,抗性变得适应性。综上所述,这些实验表明,寄生虫很少(如果有的话)通过扩散来推动细菌逃逸的进化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fight Not Flight: Parasites Drive the Bacterial Evolution of Resistance, Not Escape.

AbstractIn the face of ubiquitous threats from parasites, hosts can evolve strategies to resist infection or to altogether avoid parasitism, for instance by avoiding behavior that could expose them to parasites or by dispersing away from local parasite threats. At the microbial scale, bacteria frequently encounter viral parasites, bacteriophages. While bacteria are known to utilize a number of strategies to resist infection by phages and can have the capacity to avoid moving toward phage-infected cells, it is unknown whether bacteria can evolve dispersal to escape from phages. To answer this question, we combined experimental evolution and mathematical modeling. Experimental evolution of the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens in environments with differing spatial distributions of the phage Phi2 revealed that the host bacteria evolved resistance depending on parasite distribution but did not evolve dispersal to escape parasite infection. Simulations using parameterized mathematical models of bacterial growth and swimming motility showed that this is a general finding: while increased dispersal is adaptive in the absence of parasites, in the presence of parasites that fitness benefit disappears and resistance becomes adaptive, regardless of the spatial distribution of parasites. Together, these experiments suggest that parasites should rarely, if ever, drive the evolution of bacterial escape via dispersal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Naturalist
American Naturalist 环境科学-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
194
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信