距离对注视方向高估的影响。

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Gernot Horstmann, Linda Linke
{"title":"距离对注视方向高估的影响。","authors":"Gernot Horstmann, Linda Linke","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A widely known result from gaze perception research is the overestimation effect where gaze direction-or more precisely gaze endpoints-is seen farther to the side than they actually are. A common gain factor reported in the literature is 1.5, that is, an overestimation of gaze endpoint by 50%. Gaze endpoint, however, must be a joint function of gaze angle and distance. Results from data collected between 2022 and 2024 show that a strong overestimation for photographed models at short distances turns into almost perfect perception at larger distances. This was equally true when gazing was done with the eyes only (head straight relative to observer) and with the head only (eyes straight relative to head). A new method measures gaze angle by triangulation from fixation points at varying distances and separates two components: (a) a slope and (b) an intercept. This triangulation indicates that the overestimation of gaze angle (slope) is very moderate and that the strong effects in gaze endpoints are mainly due to the intercept. Further experiments indicate that the intercept effects are confined to two-dimensional pictures of lookers and are not observed in physical three-dimensional lookers. The results are interpreted with reference to the distinction between picture space and physical space. Moreover, the present results do not fully comply with the classic partial-occlusion explanation for the overestimation effect. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":"51 2","pages":"260-281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of distance on the overestimation of gaze direction.\",\"authors\":\"Gernot Horstmann, Linda Linke\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xhp0001295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A widely known result from gaze perception research is the overestimation effect where gaze direction-or more precisely gaze endpoints-is seen farther to the side than they actually are. A common gain factor reported in the literature is 1.5, that is, an overestimation of gaze endpoint by 50%. Gaze endpoint, however, must be a joint function of gaze angle and distance. Results from data collected between 2022 and 2024 show that a strong overestimation for photographed models at short distances turns into almost perfect perception at larger distances. This was equally true when gazing was done with the eyes only (head straight relative to observer) and with the head only (eyes straight relative to head). A new method measures gaze angle by triangulation from fixation points at varying distances and separates two components: (a) a slope and (b) an intercept. This triangulation indicates that the overestimation of gaze angle (slope) is very moderate and that the strong effects in gaze endpoints are mainly due to the intercept. Further experiments indicate that the intercept effects are confined to two-dimensional pictures of lookers and are not observed in physical three-dimensional lookers. The results are interpreted with reference to the distinction between picture space and physical space. Moreover, the present results do not fully comply with the classic partial-occlusion explanation for the overestimation effect. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"260-281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001295\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001295","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

凝视感知研究的一个广为人知的结果是高估效应,即凝视的方向——或者更准确地说,凝视的终点——被看到的距离比实际距离更远。文献中报道的一个常见增益因子是1.5,也就是说,对注视端点的高估了50%。然而,凝视端点必须是凝视角度和距离的联合函数。从2022年到2024年收集的数据得出的结果表明,对短距离拍摄的模型的强烈高估在远距离上变成了几乎完美的感知。当只盯着眼睛(相对于观察者的头部伸直)和只盯着头(相对于头部的眼睛伸直)进行凝视时,结果是一样的。一种新的方法通过三角测量法从不同距离的注视点测量凝视角,并将两个分量分开:(A)斜率和(b)截距。这种三角剖分表明,对凝视角(斜率)的高估是非常温和的,凝视端点的强烈影响主要是由于截距。进一步的实验表明,截距效应仅限于观察者的二维图像,而在物理三维观察者中没有观察到。根据图像空间和物理空间的区别对结果进行了解释。此外,目前的结果并不完全符合对高估效应的经典部分遮挡解释。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of distance on the overestimation of gaze direction.

A widely known result from gaze perception research is the overestimation effect where gaze direction-or more precisely gaze endpoints-is seen farther to the side than they actually are. A common gain factor reported in the literature is 1.5, that is, an overestimation of gaze endpoint by 50%. Gaze endpoint, however, must be a joint function of gaze angle and distance. Results from data collected between 2022 and 2024 show that a strong overestimation for photographed models at short distances turns into almost perfect perception at larger distances. This was equally true when gazing was done with the eyes only (head straight relative to observer) and with the head only (eyes straight relative to head). A new method measures gaze angle by triangulation from fixation points at varying distances and separates two components: (a) a slope and (b) an intercept. This triangulation indicates that the overestimation of gaze angle (slope) is very moderate and that the strong effects in gaze endpoints are mainly due to the intercept. Further experiments indicate that the intercept effects are confined to two-dimensional pictures of lookers and are not observed in physical three-dimensional lookers. The results are interpreted with reference to the distinction between picture space and physical space. Moreover, the present results do not fully comply with the classic partial-occlusion explanation for the overestimation effect. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信