Claire D Johnson, Bart N Green, Lyndon G Amorin-Woods, Ilija Arar, Kara D Burnham, David C Byfield, Joel P Carmichael, Waleska Crespo, Philip Dewhurst, Chantal Doucet, Andrew S Dunn, Marina Fox, Navine Haworth, Adrian G W Hunnisett, Russ Iwami, Amanda Jones-Harris, Carolina Kolberg, Charmaine M Korporaal, Craig S Little, Celia P Maguire, Kevin S Mathers, Daniel Moore, John P Mrozek, Sharné Naidoo, Robert M Rowell, Gary Schultz, Gregory J Snow, Stephanie G B Sullivan, Krista L Ward, Stephney Whillier, David Wickes, Yi Kai Wong, Christopher Yelverton
{"title":"脊医教育研究和学术出版物的全球现状:范围综述。","authors":"Claire D Johnson, Bart N Green, Lyndon G Amorin-Woods, Ilija Arar, Kara D Burnham, David C Byfield, Joel P Carmichael, Waleska Crespo, Philip Dewhurst, Chantal Doucet, Andrew S Dunn, Marina Fox, Navine Haworth, Adrian G W Hunnisett, Russ Iwami, Amanda Jones-Harris, Carolina Kolberg, Charmaine M Korporaal, Craig S Little, Celia P Maguire, Kevin S Mathers, Daniel Moore, John P Mrozek, Sharné Naidoo, Robert M Rowell, Gary Schultz, Gregory J Snow, Stephanie G B Sullivan, Krista L Ward, Stephney Whillier, David Wickes, Yi Kai Wong, Christopher Yelverton","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to map the volume (number of studies) and nature (topics and designs) of chiropractic education research and scholarly publications on chiropractic learners and programs worldwide.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the expansion of the chiropractic profession and its recognition by entities such as the World Health Organization, a gap exists in comprehending the international landscape of chiropractic education. No prior studies have systematically mapped the volume and nature of chiropractic education research and scholarly publications. A scoping review of chiropractic education research and scholarly publications is needed to guide future policy development, research agendas, and educational initiatives within the chiropractic profession.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Publications in the indexed literature on chiropractic students, graduates, academics, and programs in any chiropractic education setting were included. Studies focused on chiropractic programs and education for chiropractic students or chiropractors worldwide were considered for inclusion. All research designs, literature reviews, descriptive studies, and commentaries were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was conducted according to JBI methodology for scoping reviews and was reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The databases PubMed (NLM), Scopus, CINAHL via EBSCOhost, Index to Chiropractic Literature, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, and Educational Resources Information Center were searched from their inception to November 5 and 6, 2023, with no language limits. Data were extracted for primary topics, study designs, and regions of the included documents and entered in Covidence by paired independent reviewers. The findings were organized into figures and tables with a narrative description.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 7494 documents. After deduplication, 5041 were screened for relevance, of which 667 were selected for full-text review. From these, 598 were selected for data extraction. The chiropractic education topics included values/ethical competence (n=3), personal/behavioral competence (n=34), knowledge and cognitive competence (n=49), functional and clinical competence (n=93), and program-relevant research (n=419). Most designs were quantitative (n=391), followed by descriptive reports (n=91), qualitative (n=43), mixed methods (n=40), commentaries (n=22), and literature reviews (n=11). Chiropractic education was most studied in the United States (n=359), Australia (n=116), and Canada (n=106).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review reports the volume and nature of indexed publications relating to chiropractic learners and programs worldwide. This body of literature contains learner competencies in knowledge, skills, and attitudes, as well as studies about chiropractic programs. The increasing number of publications and proportion of study designs over time show that chiropractic scholars and programs are engaged in collecting, analyzing, and distributing data relevant to education and training. The map of professional competencies in the chiropractic education literature shows that the profession possesses the fundamental traits needed to contribute to the global health care workforce.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/9b3ap.</p><p><strong>Supplemental digital content: </strong>French- [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A94 ], Spanish- [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A93 ] Mandarin- [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A87 ], Portuguese- [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A88 ], Malaysian- [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A90 ], and Welsh-language [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A89 ] translations of the abstract are available.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"638-703"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974619/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global status of chiropractic education research and scholarly publications: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Claire D Johnson, Bart N Green, Lyndon G Amorin-Woods, Ilija Arar, Kara D Burnham, David C Byfield, Joel P Carmichael, Waleska Crespo, Philip Dewhurst, Chantal Doucet, Andrew S Dunn, Marina Fox, Navine Haworth, Adrian G W Hunnisett, Russ Iwami, Amanda Jones-Harris, Carolina Kolberg, Charmaine M Korporaal, Craig S Little, Celia P Maguire, Kevin S Mathers, Daniel Moore, John P Mrozek, Sharné Naidoo, Robert M Rowell, Gary Schultz, Gregory J Snow, Stephanie G B Sullivan, Krista L Ward, Stephney Whillier, David Wickes, Yi Kai Wong, Christopher Yelverton\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-24-00122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to map the volume (number of studies) and nature (topics and designs) of chiropractic education research and scholarly publications on chiropractic learners and programs worldwide.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the expansion of the chiropractic profession and its recognition by entities such as the World Health Organization, a gap exists in comprehending the international landscape of chiropractic education. No prior studies have systematically mapped the volume and nature of chiropractic education research and scholarly publications. A scoping review of chiropractic education research and scholarly publications is needed to guide future policy development, research agendas, and educational initiatives within the chiropractic profession.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Publications in the indexed literature on chiropractic students, graduates, academics, and programs in any chiropractic education setting were included. Studies focused on chiropractic programs and education for chiropractic students or chiropractors worldwide were considered for inclusion. All research designs, literature reviews, descriptive studies, and commentaries were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was conducted according to JBI methodology for scoping reviews and was reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The databases PubMed (NLM), Scopus, CINAHL via EBSCOhost, Index to Chiropractic Literature, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, and Educational Resources Information Center were searched from their inception to November 5 and 6, 2023, with no language limits. Data were extracted for primary topics, study designs, and regions of the included documents and entered in Covidence by paired independent reviewers. The findings were organized into figures and tables with a narrative description.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 7494 documents. After deduplication, 5041 were screened for relevance, of which 667 were selected for full-text review. From these, 598 were selected for data extraction. The chiropractic education topics included values/ethical competence (n=3), personal/behavioral competence (n=34), knowledge and cognitive competence (n=49), functional and clinical competence (n=93), and program-relevant research (n=419). Most designs were quantitative (n=391), followed by descriptive reports (n=91), qualitative (n=43), mixed methods (n=40), commentaries (n=22), and literature reviews (n=11). Chiropractic education was most studied in the United States (n=359), Australia (n=116), and Canada (n=106).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review reports the volume and nature of indexed publications relating to chiropractic learners and programs worldwide. This body of literature contains learner competencies in knowledge, skills, and attitudes, as well as studies about chiropractic programs. The increasing number of publications and proportion of study designs over time show that chiropractic scholars and programs are engaged in collecting, analyzing, and distributing data relevant to education and training. The map of professional competencies in the chiropractic education literature shows that the profession possesses the fundamental traits needed to contribute to the global health care workforce.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/9b3ap.</p><p><strong>Supplemental digital content: </strong>French- [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A94 ], Spanish- [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A93 ] Mandarin- [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A87 ], Portuguese- [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A88 ], Malaysian- [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A90 ], and Welsh-language [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A89 ] translations of the abstract are available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"638-703\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974619/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本综述旨在绘制全球脊椎指压疗法教育研究和关于脊椎指压疗法学习者和项目的学术出版物的数量(研究数量)和性质(主题和设计)。导读:尽管脊骨按摩专业不断扩大,并得到世界卫生组织等实体的认可,但在了解脊骨按摩教育的国际格局方面存在差距。没有先前的研究系统地描绘了脊医教育研究和学术出版物的数量和性质。需要对脊椎指压治疗教育研究和学术出版物进行范围审查,以指导未来的政策制定、研究议程和脊椎指压治疗专业的教育活动。纳入标准:收录了关于脊椎指压疗法学生、毕业生、学者和任何脊椎指压疗法教育项目的索引文献。研究的重点是脊椎指压疗法项目和全世界脊椎指压疗法学生或脊椎指压治疗师的教育。所有的研究设计、文献综述、描述性研究和评论都包括在内。方法:根据JBI范围评价方法学进行范围评价,并根据系统评价和荟萃分析范围评价扩展首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)进行报告。检索了PubMed (NLM)、Scopus、CINAHL(通过EBSCOhost)、Index to Chiropractic Literature、Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde和Educational Resources Information Center数据库,检索时间从数据库建立到2023年11月5日和6日,没有语言限制。从纳入文献的主要主题、研究设计和地区提取数据,并由配对独立审稿人输入《covid - ence》。这些发现被组织成带有叙述性描述的数字和表格。结果:搜索确定了7494个文档。重复数据删除后,筛选相关性5041篇,其中选择667篇进行全文审阅。从中选取598个进行数据提取。脊医教育主题包括价值观/伦理能力(n=3)、个人/行为能力(n=34)、知识和认知能力(n=49)、功能和临床能力(n=93)以及项目相关研究(n=419)。大多数设计是定量的(n=391),其次是描述性报告(n=91)、定性报告(n=43)、混合方法(n=40)、评论报告(n=22)和文献综述(n=11)。在美国(n=359)、澳大利亚(n=116)和加拿大(n=106)对捏脊教育的研究最多。结论:本范围综述报告了世界范围内与脊椎指压疗法学习者和项目相关的索引出版物的数量和性质。这篇文献包含了学习者在知识、技能和态度方面的能力,以及关于脊椎指压疗法项目的研究。随着时间的推移,越来越多的出版物和比例的研究设计表明,脊医学者和项目正在从事收集、分析和分发与教育和培训相关的数据。捏脊医学教育文献中的专业能力地图显示,该专业具有为全球卫生保健工作人员做出贡献所需的基本特征。评审注册:开放科学框架https://osf.io/9b3ap。
Global status of chiropractic education research and scholarly publications: a scoping review.
Objective: This scoping review aimed to map the volume (number of studies) and nature (topics and designs) of chiropractic education research and scholarly publications on chiropractic learners and programs worldwide.
Introduction: Despite the expansion of the chiropractic profession and its recognition by entities such as the World Health Organization, a gap exists in comprehending the international landscape of chiropractic education. No prior studies have systematically mapped the volume and nature of chiropractic education research and scholarly publications. A scoping review of chiropractic education research and scholarly publications is needed to guide future policy development, research agendas, and educational initiatives within the chiropractic profession.
Inclusion criteria: Publications in the indexed literature on chiropractic students, graduates, academics, and programs in any chiropractic education setting were included. Studies focused on chiropractic programs and education for chiropractic students or chiropractors worldwide were considered for inclusion. All research designs, literature reviews, descriptive studies, and commentaries were included.
Methods: This scoping review was conducted according to JBI methodology for scoping reviews and was reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The databases PubMed (NLM), Scopus, CINAHL via EBSCOhost, Index to Chiropractic Literature, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, and Educational Resources Information Center were searched from their inception to November 5 and 6, 2023, with no language limits. Data were extracted for primary topics, study designs, and regions of the included documents and entered in Covidence by paired independent reviewers. The findings were organized into figures and tables with a narrative description.
Results: The search identified 7494 documents. After deduplication, 5041 were screened for relevance, of which 667 were selected for full-text review. From these, 598 were selected for data extraction. The chiropractic education topics included values/ethical competence (n=3), personal/behavioral competence (n=34), knowledge and cognitive competence (n=49), functional and clinical competence (n=93), and program-relevant research (n=419). Most designs were quantitative (n=391), followed by descriptive reports (n=91), qualitative (n=43), mixed methods (n=40), commentaries (n=22), and literature reviews (n=11). Chiropractic education was most studied in the United States (n=359), Australia (n=116), and Canada (n=106).
Conclusions: This scoping review reports the volume and nature of indexed publications relating to chiropractic learners and programs worldwide. This body of literature contains learner competencies in knowledge, skills, and attitudes, as well as studies about chiropractic programs. The increasing number of publications and proportion of study designs over time show that chiropractic scholars and programs are engaged in collecting, analyzing, and distributing data relevant to education and training. The map of professional competencies in the chiropractic education literature shows that the profession possesses the fundamental traits needed to contribute to the global health care workforce.
Review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/9b3ap.
Supplemental digital content: French- [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A94 ], Spanish- [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A93 ] Mandarin- [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A87 ], Portuguese- [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A88 ], Malaysian- [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A90 ], and Welsh-language [ http://links.lww.com/SRX/A89 ] translations of the abstract are available.