{"title":"监狱中的精神卫生服务:确定和量化实施的障碍。","authors":"Faith Scanlon, Robert D Morgan","doi":"10.1037/ser0000945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although jails are the largest provider of mental health care nationally, access to treatment in U.S. jails is limited. Limited empirical information on factors impacting the implementation of mental health services in jail may be contributing to low treatment rates. We documented potential barriers impacting the provision of a brief cognitive-behavioral group-based intervention for people with serious mental illness in jail, including the rates of participants' recruitment, as well as starting and completing the intervention; time required for each group from recruitment to completion; and the types and frequencies of obstacles encountered during treatment sessions. We organized the barriers according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. All potential treatment recipients' questions prior to treatment, and reasons provided for not starting the treatment, were also logged and analyzed using content analysis and frequency counts; tables of the themes, frequencies, and examples of participant concerns are presented. These results suggest that although many participants were interested in and incarcerated for sufficient time to complete the intervention, relatively few participants were able to begin the groups (44%). Over 150 obstacles to treatment were encountered during treatment provision (including recurring issues with client transportation within the facility and facility lockdown). Understanding participants' progression through the study (recruitment, start, completion), their questions and reasons for not participating, and interruptions to the sessions provide important information for increasing the usability of mental health care in jails. The current findings can improve the implementation of needed evidence-based treatment in this carceral setting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental health services in jail: Identifying and quantifying barriers to implementation.\",\"authors\":\"Faith Scanlon, Robert D Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ser0000945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although jails are the largest provider of mental health care nationally, access to treatment in U.S. jails is limited. Limited empirical information on factors impacting the implementation of mental health services in jail may be contributing to low treatment rates. We documented potential barriers impacting the provision of a brief cognitive-behavioral group-based intervention for people with serious mental illness in jail, including the rates of participants' recruitment, as well as starting and completing the intervention; time required for each group from recruitment to completion; and the types and frequencies of obstacles encountered during treatment sessions. We organized the barriers according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. All potential treatment recipients' questions prior to treatment, and reasons provided for not starting the treatment, were also logged and analyzed using content analysis and frequency counts; tables of the themes, frequencies, and examples of participant concerns are presented. These results suggest that although many participants were interested in and incarcerated for sufficient time to complete the intervention, relatively few participants were able to begin the groups (44%). Over 150 obstacles to treatment were encountered during treatment provision (including recurring issues with client transportation within the facility and facility lockdown). Understanding participants' progression through the study (recruitment, start, completion), their questions and reasons for not participating, and interruptions to the sessions provide important information for increasing the usability of mental health care in jails. The current findings can improve the implementation of needed evidence-based treatment in this carceral setting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Services\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000945\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000945","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虽然监狱是全国最大的精神卫生保健提供者,但在美国监狱获得治疗的机会有限。关于影响监狱实施精神卫生服务的因素的经验资料有限,这可能是治疗率低的原因之一。我们记录了影响为监狱中严重精神疾病患者提供简短的认知行为群体干预的潜在障碍,包括参与者的招募率,以及开始和完成干预的比率;每组从招募到完成所需的时间;以及治疗过程中遇到障碍的类型和频率。我们根据实施研究综合框架对障碍进行了组织。所有潜在治疗接受者在治疗前的问题,以及提供的不开始治疗的原因,也被记录下来,并使用内容分析和频率计数进行分析;提出了主题表、频率表和参与者关注的例子。这些结果表明,尽管许多参与者对干预感兴趣,并且有足够的时间来完成干预,但能够开始小组的参与者相对较少(44%)。在提供治疗期间,遇到了150多个治疗障碍(包括设施内客户运输和设施封锁的反复出现的问题)。了解参与者在研究过程中的进展(招募、开始、完成)、他们提出的问题和不参与的原因以及会议中断的情况,为提高监狱精神卫生保健的可用性提供了重要信息。目前的研究结果可以改善在这种癌症环境中实施所需的循证治疗。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Mental health services in jail: Identifying and quantifying barriers to implementation.
Although jails are the largest provider of mental health care nationally, access to treatment in U.S. jails is limited. Limited empirical information on factors impacting the implementation of mental health services in jail may be contributing to low treatment rates. We documented potential barriers impacting the provision of a brief cognitive-behavioral group-based intervention for people with serious mental illness in jail, including the rates of participants' recruitment, as well as starting and completing the intervention; time required for each group from recruitment to completion; and the types and frequencies of obstacles encountered during treatment sessions. We organized the barriers according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. All potential treatment recipients' questions prior to treatment, and reasons provided for not starting the treatment, were also logged and analyzed using content analysis and frequency counts; tables of the themes, frequencies, and examples of participant concerns are presented. These results suggest that although many participants were interested in and incarcerated for sufficient time to complete the intervention, relatively few participants were able to begin the groups (44%). Over 150 obstacles to treatment were encountered during treatment provision (including recurring issues with client transportation within the facility and facility lockdown). Understanding participants' progression through the study (recruitment, start, completion), their questions and reasons for not participating, and interruptions to the sessions provide important information for increasing the usability of mental health care in jails. The current findings can improve the implementation of needed evidence-based treatment in this carceral setting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.