弛缓性和非弛缓性面瘫患者的健康状态效用值

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1002/ohn.1163
Bastien A Valencia-Sanchez, Murray J Bartho, Elise Krippaehne, Jess C Mace, Myriam Loyo
{"title":"弛缓性和非弛缓性面瘫患者的健康状态效用值","authors":"Bastien A Valencia-Sanchez, Murray J Bartho, Elise Krippaehne, Jess C Mace, Myriam Loyo","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary goal of this study was to measure health-state utility values (HUVs) in patients with facial paralysis before and after treatment. A secondary objective was to compare these values with those of other chronic diseases and currently available treatments.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A tertiary medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with flaccid and non-flaccid facial paralysis were included. Baseline demographics, medical comorbidities, facial paralysis history, treatment details, and disease-specific quality-of-life scores were collected. Utility values were derived using the Short-Form 6D health index at baseline and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean baseline Short-Form 6D utility value for patients with facial paralysis (n = 134) was 0.73 (± 0.14) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.75). Baseline utility values significantly correlated with disease-specific quality of life as measured by the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale (r = 0.400; P < .001), but not with Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale or Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire scores. Post-treatment utility values showed a mean improvement of 0.03 (95% CI: -0.01 to 0.08; P = .14) in the overall cohort. The flaccid group showed a greater average improvement compared to the non-flaccid group (0.05 [± 0.17] vs 0.02 [± 0.17]; P = .62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with flaccid and non-flaccid facial paralysis reported HUVs that were significantly lower than the US population norm. Treatment improved utility values in both groups. These findings provide initial data for future cost-effectiveness analyses of surgical and non-surgical treatment options for facial paralysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1570-1578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health-State Utility Values in Patients Affected by Flaccid and Non-Flaccid Facial Paralysis.\",\"authors\":\"Bastien A Valencia-Sanchez, Murray J Bartho, Elise Krippaehne, Jess C Mace, Myriam Loyo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ohn.1163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary goal of this study was to measure health-state utility values (HUVs) in patients with facial paralysis before and after treatment. A secondary objective was to compare these values with those of other chronic diseases and currently available treatments.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A tertiary medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with flaccid and non-flaccid facial paralysis were included. Baseline demographics, medical comorbidities, facial paralysis history, treatment details, and disease-specific quality-of-life scores were collected. Utility values were derived using the Short-Form 6D health index at baseline and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean baseline Short-Form 6D utility value for patients with facial paralysis (n = 134) was 0.73 (± 0.14) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.75). Baseline utility values significantly correlated with disease-specific quality of life as measured by the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale (r = 0.400; P < .001), but not with Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale or Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire scores. Post-treatment utility values showed a mean improvement of 0.03 (95% CI: -0.01 to 0.08; P = .14) in the overall cohort. The flaccid group showed a greater average improvement compared to the non-flaccid group (0.05 [± 0.17] vs 0.02 [± 0.17]; P = .62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with flaccid and non-flaccid facial paralysis reported HUVs that were significantly lower than the US population norm. Treatment improved utility values in both groups. These findings provide initial data for future cost-effectiveness analyses of surgical and non-surgical treatment options for facial paralysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1570-1578\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1163\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的主要目的是测量面瘫患者治疗前后的健康状态效用值(HUVs)。第二个目标是将这些数值与其他慢性疾病的数值和目前可用的治疗方法进行比较。研究设计:回顾性图表回顾。环境:三级医疗中心。方法:研究对象为成人弛缓性和非弛缓性面瘫。收集基线人口统计、医疗合并症、面瘫病史、治疗细节和疾病特异性生活质量评分。使用基线和治疗后的短表6D健康指数得出效用值。结果:面瘫患者(n = 134)的平均基线Short-Form 6D效用值为0.73(±0.14)(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.71-0.75)。基线效用值与面部临床评定量表测量的疾病特异性生活质量显著相关(r = 0.400;结论:弛缓性和非弛缓性面瘫患者报告的huv明显低于美国人口标准。治疗提高了两组患者的效用值。这些发现为未来面瘫手术和非手术治疗方案的成本效益分析提供了初步数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health-State Utility Values in Patients Affected by Flaccid and Non-Flaccid Facial Paralysis.

Objective: The primary goal of this study was to measure health-state utility values (HUVs) in patients with facial paralysis before and after treatment. A secondary objective was to compare these values with those of other chronic diseases and currently available treatments.

Study design: A retrospective chart review.

Setting: A tertiary medical center.

Methods: Adults with flaccid and non-flaccid facial paralysis were included. Baseline demographics, medical comorbidities, facial paralysis history, treatment details, and disease-specific quality-of-life scores were collected. Utility values were derived using the Short-Form 6D health index at baseline and after treatment.

Results: The mean baseline Short-Form 6D utility value for patients with facial paralysis (n = 134) was 0.73 (± 0.14) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.75). Baseline utility values significantly correlated with disease-specific quality of life as measured by the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale (r = 0.400; P < .001), but not with Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale or Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire scores. Post-treatment utility values showed a mean improvement of 0.03 (95% CI: -0.01 to 0.08; P = .14) in the overall cohort. The flaccid group showed a greater average improvement compared to the non-flaccid group (0.05 [± 0.17] vs 0.02 [± 0.17]; P = .62).

Conclusion: Patients with flaccid and non-flaccid facial paralysis reported HUVs that were significantly lower than the US population norm. Treatment improved utility values in both groups. These findings provide initial data for future cost-effectiveness analyses of surgical and non-surgical treatment options for facial paralysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信