缝线介导的股静脉闭合装置用于股静脉通路后的长期疗效和重复穿刺的可能性。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Akio Chikata, Takeshi Kato, Kazuo Usuda, Shuhei Fujita, Michiro Maruyama, Kanichi Otowa, Takashi Kusayama, Kenshi Hayashi, Masayuki Takamura
{"title":"缝线介导的股静脉闭合装置用于股静脉通路后的长期疗效和重复穿刺的可能性。","authors":"Akio Chikata, Takeshi Kato, Kazuo Usuda, Shuhei Fujita, Michiro Maruyama, Kanichi Otowa, Takashi Kusayama, Kenshi Hayashi, Masayuki Takamura","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02003-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term safety and reaccessibility following the use of suture-mediated vascular closure systems (SMC) for femoral vein access are not well documented. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes and feasibility of repeated femoral vein punctures after SMC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 282 patients who underwent elective catheter ablation via femoral vein access using an 8-13 Fr sheath. Patients were randomized into the pre-close or post-close groups using the ProGlide/ProStyle single-suture technique (Abbott Vascular). Duplex ultrasound evaluations were performed on day 1, day 90, and at 1 year to evaluate vascular complications. The primary and secondary endpoints included major and minor complications within 1 year. Reaccessibility was assessed in patients who required repeated procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successful re-access was achieved in 21 patients (14.9%) in the pre-close group and 16 patients (11.3%) in the post-close group who underwent repeat procedures. Long-term safety was analyzed in 91 (64.5%) and 98 (69.5%) patients in the pre-close and post-close groups, respectively. The major complication rate was 2/189 (1.1%), and the minor complication rate was 28/189 (14.8%). No difference in complication rates was observed between the pre-close group (0/91, 0.0% major, 12/91, 13.2% minor) and post-close group (2/98, 2% major, 16/98, 16.3% minor), with P-values of 0.50 and 0.68, respectively. No new vascular stenosis occurred during the chronic phase in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the long-term follow-up after femoral vein access using SMC, new-onset chronic stenosis was not observed, and reaccess was possible in repeat procedures.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>UMIN000049174.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"885-896"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term outcomes and the possibility of repeat puncture after suture-mediated closure device for femoral vein access.\",\"authors\":\"Akio Chikata, Takeshi Kato, Kazuo Usuda, Shuhei Fujita, Michiro Maruyama, Kanichi Otowa, Takashi Kusayama, Kenshi Hayashi, Masayuki Takamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-025-02003-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term safety and reaccessibility following the use of suture-mediated vascular closure systems (SMC) for femoral vein access are not well documented. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes and feasibility of repeated femoral vein punctures after SMC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 282 patients who underwent elective catheter ablation via femoral vein access using an 8-13 Fr sheath. Patients were randomized into the pre-close or post-close groups using the ProGlide/ProStyle single-suture technique (Abbott Vascular). Duplex ultrasound evaluations were performed on day 1, day 90, and at 1 year to evaluate vascular complications. The primary and secondary endpoints included major and minor complications within 1 year. Reaccessibility was assessed in patients who required repeated procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successful re-access was achieved in 21 patients (14.9%) in the pre-close group and 16 patients (11.3%) in the post-close group who underwent repeat procedures. Long-term safety was analyzed in 91 (64.5%) and 98 (69.5%) patients in the pre-close and post-close groups, respectively. The major complication rate was 2/189 (1.1%), and the minor complication rate was 28/189 (14.8%). No difference in complication rates was observed between the pre-close group (0/91, 0.0% major, 12/91, 13.2% minor) and post-close group (2/98, 2% major, 16/98, 16.3% minor), with P-values of 0.50 and 0.68, respectively. No new vascular stenosis occurred during the chronic phase in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the long-term follow-up after femoral vein access using SMC, new-onset chronic stenosis was not observed, and reaccess was possible in repeat procedures.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>UMIN000049174.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"885-896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02003-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02003-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用缝线介导的血管闭合系统(SMC)进行股静脉通路的长期安全性和可及性尚未得到很好的证明。本研究旨在评估SMC术后重复股静脉穿刺的长期疗效和可行性。方法:我们分析了282例经8-13 Fr护套经股静脉选择性导管消融的患者。采用ProGlide/ProStyle单缝线技术(Abbott Vascular)将患者随机分为缝合前组和缝合后组。在第1天、第90天和第1年时进行双超声评估,以评估血管并发症。主要和次要终点包括1年内的主要和次要并发症。对需要重复手术的患者的可及性进行评估。结果:闭合前组有21例(14.9%)患者复位成功,闭合后组有16例(11.3%)患者复位成功。对闭合前组和闭合后组分别有91例(64.5%)和98例(69.5%)患者进行了长期安全性分析。主要并发症发生率为2/189(1.1%),次要并发症发生率为28/189(14.8%)。闭合前组(0/91,0.0%严重,12/91,13.2%轻微)与闭合后组(2/98,2%严重,16/98,16.3%轻微)并发症发生率无差异,p值分别为0.50和0.68。两组在慢性期均未发生新的血管狭窄。结论:SMC入路后的长期随访中,未观察到新发的慢性狭窄,并且可以在重复手术中重新入路。临床试验注册号:UMIN000049174。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term outcomes and the possibility of repeat puncture after suture-mediated closure device for femoral vein access.

Background: Long-term safety and reaccessibility following the use of suture-mediated vascular closure systems (SMC) for femoral vein access are not well documented. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes and feasibility of repeated femoral vein punctures after SMC.

Methods: We analyzed 282 patients who underwent elective catheter ablation via femoral vein access using an 8-13 Fr sheath. Patients were randomized into the pre-close or post-close groups using the ProGlide/ProStyle single-suture technique (Abbott Vascular). Duplex ultrasound evaluations were performed on day 1, day 90, and at 1 year to evaluate vascular complications. The primary and secondary endpoints included major and minor complications within 1 year. Reaccessibility was assessed in patients who required repeated procedures.

Results: Successful re-access was achieved in 21 patients (14.9%) in the pre-close group and 16 patients (11.3%) in the post-close group who underwent repeat procedures. Long-term safety was analyzed in 91 (64.5%) and 98 (69.5%) patients in the pre-close and post-close groups, respectively. The major complication rate was 2/189 (1.1%), and the minor complication rate was 28/189 (14.8%). No difference in complication rates was observed between the pre-close group (0/91, 0.0% major, 12/91, 13.2% minor) and post-close group (2/98, 2% major, 16/98, 16.3% minor), with P-values of 0.50 and 0.68, respectively. No new vascular stenosis occurred during the chronic phase in either group.

Conclusion: In the long-term follow-up after femoral vein access using SMC, new-onset chronic stenosis was not observed, and reaccess was possible in repeat procedures.

Clinical trial registration: UMIN000049174.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信