调查评估目前的做法和解决挑战的妇科近距离放射治疗在澳大利亚和新西兰。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mollie Kain, Geetha Govindarajulu, Carol Johnson, April Xu-Holland, Carminia Lapuz
{"title":"调查评估目前的做法和解决挑战的妇科近距离放射治疗在澳大利亚和新西兰。","authors":"Mollie Kain,&nbsp;Geetha Govindarajulu,&nbsp;Carol Johnson,&nbsp;April Xu-Holland,&nbsp;Carminia Lapuz","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This survey assessed gynaecological brachytherapy caseloads, local training requirements and quality assurance processes across Australia and New Zealand.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The survey was developed by the Gynaecological Oncology Radiation Oncology Collaboration (GOROC) and emailed to all centres offering gynaecological brachytherapy across Australia and New Zealand. It covered 9 areas including caseloads per centre and per radiation oncologist, techniques practised, local training requirements and quality assurance processes over a 2-year period – 2019 and 2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The response rate was 18 out of 25 centres. All centres offered vaginal vault brachytherapy and 89% treated an average of at least 10 patients per annum. Intracavitary and/or interstitial brachytherapy was offered at 89% of centres of which 31% treated less than an average of 10 patients per annum and 23% of radiation oncologists did less than an average of 5 or more insertions per annum as recommended in the GOROC guidelines. Most centres required only Fellowship from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologist to practice gynaecological brachytherapy. Peer review of volumes and dosimetry was routinely performed in 28% and 17% of centres, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This survey adds to the limited literature available regarding practice patterns of brachytherapy worldwide. Ensuring adequate training and robust quality assurance processes with volume and dosimetry review may support all centres and clinicians to continue to safely offer this complex technique.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"69 2","pages":"304-310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey to assess present practice and address challenges in gynaecological brachytherapy in Australia and New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"Mollie Kain,&nbsp;Geetha Govindarajulu,&nbsp;Carol Johnson,&nbsp;April Xu-Holland,&nbsp;Carminia Lapuz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.13753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>This survey assessed gynaecological brachytherapy caseloads, local training requirements and quality assurance processes across Australia and New Zealand.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The survey was developed by the Gynaecological Oncology Radiation Oncology Collaboration (GOROC) and emailed to all centres offering gynaecological brachytherapy across Australia and New Zealand. It covered 9 areas including caseloads per centre and per radiation oncologist, techniques practised, local training requirements and quality assurance processes over a 2-year period – 2019 and 2020.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The response rate was 18 out of 25 centres. All centres offered vaginal vault brachytherapy and 89% treated an average of at least 10 patients per annum. Intracavitary and/or interstitial brachytherapy was offered at 89% of centres of which 31% treated less than an average of 10 patients per annum and 23% of radiation oncologists did less than an average of 5 or more insertions per annum as recommended in the GOROC guidelines. Most centres required only Fellowship from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologist to practice gynaecological brachytherapy. Peer review of volumes and dosimetry was routinely performed in 28% and 17% of centres, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This survey adds to the limited literature available regarding practice patterns of brachytherapy worldwide. Ensuring adequate training and robust quality assurance processes with volume and dosimetry review may support all centres and clinicians to continue to safely offer this complex technique.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"69 2\",\"pages\":\"304-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13753\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13753","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本调查评估了澳大利亚和新西兰的妇科近距离放射治疗病例量、当地培训要求和质量保证过程。方法:该调查由妇科肿瘤放射肿瘤协作组织(GOROC)开展,并通过电子邮件发送给澳大利亚和新西兰所有提供妇科近距离放疗的中心。它涵盖了9个领域,包括每个中心和每个放射肿瘤学家的病例量,所采用的技术,当地培训要求和质量保证过程,为期两年(2019年和2020年)。结果:25个中心中有效率为18个。所有中心都提供阴道拱顶近距离治疗,89%的中心平均每年至少治疗10名患者。根据GOROC指南的建议,89%的中心提供腔内和/或间质近距离放疗,其中31%的中心每年治疗的患者少于平均10例,23%的放射肿瘤学家每年治疗的患者少于平均5例或更多。大多数中心只需要澳大利亚皇家和新西兰放射科医师学院的奖学金就可以进行妇科近距离放疗。分别在28%和17%的中心例行进行了体积和剂量的同行评议。结论:这项调查增加了有限的文献关于近距离治疗的实践模式。确保充分的培训和强有力的质量保证流程,以及体积和剂量学审查,可以支持所有中心和临床医生继续安全地提供这种复杂的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survey to assess present practice and address challenges in gynaecological brachytherapy in Australia and New Zealand

Introduction

This survey assessed gynaecological brachytherapy caseloads, local training requirements and quality assurance processes across Australia and New Zealand.

Methods

The survey was developed by the Gynaecological Oncology Radiation Oncology Collaboration (GOROC) and emailed to all centres offering gynaecological brachytherapy across Australia and New Zealand. It covered 9 areas including caseloads per centre and per radiation oncologist, techniques practised, local training requirements and quality assurance processes over a 2-year period – 2019 and 2020.

Results

The response rate was 18 out of 25 centres. All centres offered vaginal vault brachytherapy and 89% treated an average of at least 10 patients per annum. Intracavitary and/or interstitial brachytherapy was offered at 89% of centres of which 31% treated less than an average of 10 patients per annum and 23% of radiation oncologists did less than an average of 5 or more insertions per annum as recommended in the GOROC guidelines. Most centres required only Fellowship from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologist to practice gynaecological brachytherapy. Peer review of volumes and dosimetry was routinely performed in 28% and 17% of centres, respectively.

Conclusion

This survey adds to the limited literature available regarding practice patterns of brachytherapy worldwide. Ensuring adequate training and robust quality assurance processes with volume and dosimetry review may support all centres and clinicians to continue to safely offer this complex technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信