一项比较12-3-30跑步机训练和自定速跑步机训练代谢反应的探索性研究。

Q1 Health Professions
Michael W H Wong, Dustin W Davis, Olivia R Perez, Bianca Weyers, Devin M Green, Alan V Garcia, James W Navalta
{"title":"一项比较12-3-30跑步机训练和自定速跑步机训练代谢反应的探索性研究。","authors":"Michael W H Wong, Dustin W Davis, Olivia R Perez, Bianca Weyers, Devin M Green, Alan V Garcia, James W Navalta","doi":"10.70252/UBIX5911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The fitness movement in the United States has evolved substantially since its emergence in the late 20th century, with social media platforms like YouTube and TikTok now playing a pivotal role in disseminating fitness programs and associated claims. One program that has gained considerable popularity is the 12-3-30 treadmill workout (12-3-30), which involves walking at a 12% grade at 3 mph for 30 minutes. Despite widespread claims about its effectiveness in burning fat and calories, there is a lack of peer-reviewed scientific studies evaluating these claims. The present study investigated metabolic responses to 12-3-30 compared to self-paced treadmill running, with both sessions matched for total energy expenditure. Sixteen participants (7 female, 9 male) completed both sessions in a controlled laboratory setting, where metabolic data were collected using a metabolic analyzer. The measures recorded were completion time, total energy expenditure, energy expenditure rate, and substrate utilization (percentage of carbohydrate [%CHO] and fat [%FAT]). The results showed that, when matched for total energy expenditure, 12-3-30 had a significantly longer completion time, lower energy expenditure rate, higher %FAT, and lower %CHO than self-paced running. While 12-3-30 may be less time efficient than self-paced running for expending energy, it may be more advantageous for individuals aiming to increase fat utilization. The present study enhances our understanding of the metabolic demands associated with a trending fitness program and highlights the importance of scientifically evaluating such programs to provide evidence-based recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"18 6","pages":"56-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Exploratory Study Comparing the Metabolic Responses between the 12-3-30 Treadmill Workout and Self-Paced Treadmill Running.\",\"authors\":\"Michael W H Wong, Dustin W Davis, Olivia R Perez, Bianca Weyers, Devin M Green, Alan V Garcia, James W Navalta\",\"doi\":\"10.70252/UBIX5911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The fitness movement in the United States has evolved substantially since its emergence in the late 20th century, with social media platforms like YouTube and TikTok now playing a pivotal role in disseminating fitness programs and associated claims. One program that has gained considerable popularity is the 12-3-30 treadmill workout (12-3-30), which involves walking at a 12% grade at 3 mph for 30 minutes. Despite widespread claims about its effectiveness in burning fat and calories, there is a lack of peer-reviewed scientific studies evaluating these claims. The present study investigated metabolic responses to 12-3-30 compared to self-paced treadmill running, with both sessions matched for total energy expenditure. Sixteen participants (7 female, 9 male) completed both sessions in a controlled laboratory setting, where metabolic data were collected using a metabolic analyzer. The measures recorded were completion time, total energy expenditure, energy expenditure rate, and substrate utilization (percentage of carbohydrate [%CHO] and fat [%FAT]). The results showed that, when matched for total energy expenditure, 12-3-30 had a significantly longer completion time, lower energy expenditure rate, higher %FAT, and lower %CHO than self-paced running. While 12-3-30 may be less time efficient than self-paced running for expending energy, it may be more advantageous for individuals aiming to increase fat utilization. The present study enhances our understanding of the metabolic demands associated with a trending fitness program and highlights the importance of scientifically evaluating such programs to provide evidence-based recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"18 6\",\"pages\":\"56-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798546/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.70252/UBIX5911\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70252/UBIX5911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自20世纪末出现以来,美国的健身运动已经有了很大的发展,YouTube和TikTok等社交媒体平台现在在传播健身项目和相关主张方面发挥着关键作用。其中一个相当受欢迎的项目是12-3-30跑步机锻炼(12-3-30),它包括以每小时3英里的速度以12%的速度步行30分钟。尽管人们普遍认为它能有效燃烧脂肪和卡路里,但缺乏经过同行评审的科学研究来评估这些说法。本研究调查了与自定节奏跑步机跑步相比,12-3-30的代谢反应,两个阶段的总能量消耗相匹配。16名参与者(7名女性,9名男性)在受控的实验室环境中完成了两个阶段,使用代谢分析仪收集代谢数据。记录的指标包括完成时间、总能量消耗、能量消耗率和底物利用率(碳水化合物百分比[%CHO]和脂肪百分比[% fat])。结果表明,在与总能量消耗相匹配的情况下,与自定速跑步相比,12-3-30完成时间更长,能量消耗率更低,脂肪含量更高,CHO含量更低。虽然12-3-30在消耗能量方面可能不如自定节奏跑步有效率,但对于那些希望增加脂肪利用率的人来说,它可能更有利。目前的研究增强了我们对与流行健身计划相关的代谢需求的理解,并强调了科学评估此类计划以提供循证建议的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Exploratory Study Comparing the Metabolic Responses between the 12-3-30 Treadmill Workout and Self-Paced Treadmill Running.

The fitness movement in the United States has evolved substantially since its emergence in the late 20th century, with social media platforms like YouTube and TikTok now playing a pivotal role in disseminating fitness programs and associated claims. One program that has gained considerable popularity is the 12-3-30 treadmill workout (12-3-30), which involves walking at a 12% grade at 3 mph for 30 minutes. Despite widespread claims about its effectiveness in burning fat and calories, there is a lack of peer-reviewed scientific studies evaluating these claims. The present study investigated metabolic responses to 12-3-30 compared to self-paced treadmill running, with both sessions matched for total energy expenditure. Sixteen participants (7 female, 9 male) completed both sessions in a controlled laboratory setting, where metabolic data were collected using a metabolic analyzer. The measures recorded were completion time, total energy expenditure, energy expenditure rate, and substrate utilization (percentage of carbohydrate [%CHO] and fat [%FAT]). The results showed that, when matched for total energy expenditure, 12-3-30 had a significantly longer completion time, lower energy expenditure rate, higher %FAT, and lower %CHO than self-paced running. While 12-3-30 may be less time efficient than self-paced running for expending energy, it may be more advantageous for individuals aiming to increase fat utilization. The present study enhances our understanding of the metabolic demands associated with a trending fitness program and highlights the importance of scientifically evaluating such programs to provide evidence-based recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信