烟酒枪支弹药管理局(ATF)对联邦枪支弹药管理局(FFL)的检查及其后违规行为的预测因素。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Paul Reeping, Grace Killian, Ariana N Gobaud, Christina Mehranbod, Sonali Rajan
{"title":"烟酒枪支弹药管理局(ATF)对联邦枪支弹药管理局(FFL)的检查及其后违规行为的预测因素。","authors":"Paul Reeping, Grace Killian, Ariana N Gobaud, Christina Mehranbod, Sonali Rajan","doi":"10.1136/ip-2024-045360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) conducts inspections of Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to ensure compliance with federal laws in an effort to keep the public safe from firearm violence. However, the criteria for which FFLs are inspected lacks transparency, potentially signalling inefficiencies or biases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted data on FFL inspections and violations (2016-2017) requiring remedial action from the <i>Gun Store Transparency Project</i> database and the ATF's FFLs listings. Using a generalised linear mixed model with a random effect for states and robust SE, we estimated the census tract and state level predictors of 1) the likelihood of the ATF inspecting an FFL and 2) among those inspected, the likelihood of a violation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 93,420 FFLs, 22 921 were inspected and 2392 had violations requiring remedial action. Increased likelihood of inspection was statistically significantly associated with higher levels of poverty, lower median income, greater non-White population percentages, and older census tract median ages. The sole predictor of an FFL receiving a violation requiring remedial action was the state's firearm law permissiveness.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>ATF inspections disproportionately targeted communities with higher poverty, lower median income, larger non-White populations, and older demographics. This indicates potential racial and socioeconomic biases, diverting attention from jurisdictions with more lenient firearm laws where violations were more likely to occur.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ATF needs to reassess the influence of potential biases on its strategies for selecting FFLs for inspections and instead focus on risk-based assessments in order to promote public safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of ATF inspections of FFLs and subsequent violations.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Reeping, Grace Killian, Ariana N Gobaud, Christina Mehranbod, Sonali Rajan\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ip-2024-045360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) conducts inspections of Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to ensure compliance with federal laws in an effort to keep the public safe from firearm violence. However, the criteria for which FFLs are inspected lacks transparency, potentially signalling inefficiencies or biases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted data on FFL inspections and violations (2016-2017) requiring remedial action from the <i>Gun Store Transparency Project</i> database and the ATF's FFLs listings. Using a generalised linear mixed model with a random effect for states and robust SE, we estimated the census tract and state level predictors of 1) the likelihood of the ATF inspecting an FFL and 2) among those inspected, the likelihood of a violation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 93,420 FFLs, 22 921 were inspected and 2392 had violations requiring remedial action. Increased likelihood of inspection was statistically significantly associated with higher levels of poverty, lower median income, greater non-White population percentages, and older census tract median ages. The sole predictor of an FFL receiving a violation requiring remedial action was the state's firearm law permissiveness.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>ATF inspections disproportionately targeted communities with higher poverty, lower median income, larger non-White populations, and older demographics. This indicates potential racial and socioeconomic biases, diverting attention from jurisdictions with more lenient firearm laws where violations were more likely to occur.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ATF needs to reassess the influence of potential biases on its strategies for selecting FFLs for inspections and instead focus on risk-based assessments in order to promote public safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2024-045360\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2024-045360","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:烟酒枪支爆炸物管理局(ATF)对联邦枪支许可证持有者(ffl)进行检查,以确保遵守联邦法律,努力保护公众安全,免受枪支暴力。然而,检查ffl的标准缺乏透明度,可能表明效率低下或存在偏见。方法:我们从枪支商店透明度项目数据库和ATF的FFL清单中提取了2016-2017年需要采取补救措施的FFL检查和违规数据。使用具有各州随机效应和稳健SE的广义线性混合模型,我们估计了人口普查区和州一级的预测因子:1)ATF检查FFL的可能性;2)在被检查的人群中,违规的可能性。结果:在93420个ffl中,检查了22921个,有2392个违规需要纠正。增加的检查可能性在统计上与较高的贫困水平、较低的收入中位数、较高的非白人人口百分比和较大的人口普查区中位数年龄显著相关。唯一能预测FFL是否违反规定需要采取补救措施的因素是该州的枪支法许可。讨论:ATF检查不成比例地针对贫困程度较高、收入中位数较低、非白人人口较多和年龄较大的社区。这表明了潜在的种族和社会经济偏见,将人们的注意力从枪支法律更宽松的司法管辖区转移到更容易发生违法行为的地方。结论:ATF需要重新评估潜在偏见对其选择ffl检查策略的影响,并将重点放在基于风险的评估上,以促进公共安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of ATF inspections of FFLs and subsequent violations.

Background: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) conducts inspections of Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to ensure compliance with federal laws in an effort to keep the public safe from firearm violence. However, the criteria for which FFLs are inspected lacks transparency, potentially signalling inefficiencies or biases.

Methods: We extracted data on FFL inspections and violations (2016-2017) requiring remedial action from the Gun Store Transparency Project database and the ATF's FFLs listings. Using a generalised linear mixed model with a random effect for states and robust SE, we estimated the census tract and state level predictors of 1) the likelihood of the ATF inspecting an FFL and 2) among those inspected, the likelihood of a violation.

Results: Of the 93,420 FFLs, 22 921 were inspected and 2392 had violations requiring remedial action. Increased likelihood of inspection was statistically significantly associated with higher levels of poverty, lower median income, greater non-White population percentages, and older census tract median ages. The sole predictor of an FFL receiving a violation requiring remedial action was the state's firearm law permissiveness.

Discussion: ATF inspections disproportionately targeted communities with higher poverty, lower median income, larger non-White populations, and older demographics. This indicates potential racial and socioeconomic biases, diverting attention from jurisdictions with more lenient firearm laws where violations were more likely to occur.

Conclusion: The ATF needs to reassess the influence of potential biases on its strategies for selecting FFLs for inspections and instead focus on risk-based assessments in order to promote public safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Injury Prevention
Injury Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1995, Injury Prevention has been the pre-eminent repository of original research and compelling commentary relevant to this increasingly important field. An international peer reviewed journal, it offers the best in science, policy, and public health practice to reduce the burden of injury in all age groups around the world. The journal publishes original research, opinion, debate and special features on the prevention of unintentional, occupational and intentional (violence-related) injuries. Injury Prevention is online only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信