利用SARS-CoV-2核蛋白抗体检测(再)感染。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Christel E Hoeve, Nienke Neppelenbroek, Eric R A Vos, Anne J Huiberts, Stijn P Andeweg, Gerco den Hartog, Robert van Binnendijk, Hester de Melker, Susan van den Hof, Mirjam Knol
{"title":"利用SARS-CoV-2核蛋白抗体检测(再)感染。","authors":"Christel E Hoeve, Nienke Neppelenbroek, Eric R A Vos, Anne J Huiberts, Stijn P Andeweg, Gerco den Hartog, Robert van Binnendijk, Hester de Melker, Susan van den Hof, Mirjam Knol","doi":"10.1017/S095026882500010X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We assessed the validity of serum total anti-nucleoprotein Immunoglobulin (<i>N</i>-antibodies) to identify SARS-CoV-2 (re)infections by estimating the persistence of <i>N</i>-antibody seropositivity and boosting following infection. From a prospective Dutch cohort study (VASCO), we included adult participants with ≥2 consecutive self-collected serum samples, 4-8 months apart, between May 2021-May 2023. Sample pairs were stratified by <i>N</i>-seropositivity of the first sample and by self-reported infection within the sampling interval. We calculated the proportions of participants with <i>N</i>-seroconversion and fold-increase (1.5, 2, 3, 4) of <i>N</i>-antibody concentration over time since infection and explored determinants. We included 67,632 sample pairs. Pairs with a seronegative first sample (70%) showed 89% <i>N</i>-seroconversion after reported infection and 11% when no infection was reported. In pairs with a seropositive first sample (30%), 82%-65% showed a 1.5- to 4-fold increase with a reported reinfection, and 19%-10% without a reported reinfection, respectively. After one year, 83% remained <i>N</i>-seropositive post-first infection and 93%-61% showed a 1.5-fold to 4-fold increase post-reinfection. Odds for seroconversion/fold increase were higher for symptomatic infections and Omicron infections. In the current era with limited antigen or PCR testing, <i>N</i>-serology can be validly used to detect SARS-CoV-2 (re)infections at least up to a year after infection, supporting the monitoring of COVID-19 burden and vaccine effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":11721,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":"e38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869087/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein antibodies to detect (re)infection.\",\"authors\":\"Christel E Hoeve, Nienke Neppelenbroek, Eric R A Vos, Anne J Huiberts, Stijn P Andeweg, Gerco den Hartog, Robert van Binnendijk, Hester de Melker, Susan van den Hof, Mirjam Knol\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S095026882500010X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We assessed the validity of serum total anti-nucleoprotein Immunoglobulin (<i>N</i>-antibodies) to identify SARS-CoV-2 (re)infections by estimating the persistence of <i>N</i>-antibody seropositivity and boosting following infection. From a prospective Dutch cohort study (VASCO), we included adult participants with ≥2 consecutive self-collected serum samples, 4-8 months apart, between May 2021-May 2023. Sample pairs were stratified by <i>N</i>-seropositivity of the first sample and by self-reported infection within the sampling interval. We calculated the proportions of participants with <i>N</i>-seroconversion and fold-increase (1.5, 2, 3, 4) of <i>N</i>-antibody concentration over time since infection and explored determinants. We included 67,632 sample pairs. Pairs with a seronegative first sample (70%) showed 89% <i>N</i>-seroconversion after reported infection and 11% when no infection was reported. In pairs with a seropositive first sample (30%), 82%-65% showed a 1.5- to 4-fold increase with a reported reinfection, and 19%-10% without a reported reinfection, respectively. After one year, 83% remained <i>N</i>-seropositive post-first infection and 93%-61% showed a 1.5-fold to 4-fold increase post-reinfection. Odds for seroconversion/fold increase were higher for symptomatic infections and Omicron infections. In the current era with limited antigen or PCR testing, <i>N</i>-serology can be validly used to detect SARS-CoV-2 (re)infections at least up to a year after infection, supporting the monitoring of COVID-19 burden and vaccine effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869087/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026882500010X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026882500010X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们评估了血清总抗核蛋白免疫球蛋白(n抗体)的有效性,通过估计n抗体血清阳性的持久性和感染后的增强来识别SARS-CoV-2(再)感染。从一项前瞻性荷兰队列研究(VASCO)中,我们纳入了成人参与者,他们在2021年5月至2023年5月期间连续收集≥2份自采血清样本,间隔4-8个月。根据第一个样本的n -血清阳性和采样间隔内自我报告的感染情况对样本进行分层。我们计算了感染后n -血清转换和n -抗体浓度随时间增加(1.5,2,3,4)的参与者比例,并探索了决定因素。我们纳入了67,632对样本。第一份血清阴性样本(70%)的配对在报告感染后显示89%的n -血清转化,未报告感染时为11%。在首次样本呈血清阳性(30%)的配对中,82%-65%的人报告再感染增加1.5- 4倍,19%-10%的人未报告再感染。一年后,83%的患者首次感染后仍呈血清n -阳性,93%-61%的患者再次感染后n -阳性增加1.5- 4倍。有症状感染和欧米克隆感染的血清转化/倍数增加的几率更高。在目前抗原或PCR检测有限的时代,n -血清学可有效用于检测感染后至少长达一年的SARS-CoV-2(再)感染,支持监测COVID-19负担和疫苗有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein antibodies to detect (re)infection.

We assessed the validity of serum total anti-nucleoprotein Immunoglobulin (N-antibodies) to identify SARS-CoV-2 (re)infections by estimating the persistence of N-antibody seropositivity and boosting following infection. From a prospective Dutch cohort study (VASCO), we included adult participants with ≥2 consecutive self-collected serum samples, 4-8 months apart, between May 2021-May 2023. Sample pairs were stratified by N-seropositivity of the first sample and by self-reported infection within the sampling interval. We calculated the proportions of participants with N-seroconversion and fold-increase (1.5, 2, 3, 4) of N-antibody concentration over time since infection and explored determinants. We included 67,632 sample pairs. Pairs with a seronegative first sample (70%) showed 89% N-seroconversion after reported infection and 11% when no infection was reported. In pairs with a seropositive first sample (30%), 82%-65% showed a 1.5- to 4-fold increase with a reported reinfection, and 19%-10% without a reported reinfection, respectively. After one year, 83% remained N-seropositive post-first infection and 93%-61% showed a 1.5-fold to 4-fold increase post-reinfection. Odds for seroconversion/fold increase were higher for symptomatic infections and Omicron infections. In the current era with limited antigen or PCR testing, N-serology can be validly used to detect SARS-CoV-2 (re)infections at least up to a year after infection, supporting the monitoring of COVID-19 burden and vaccine effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiology and Infection
Epidemiology and Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
366
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology & Infection publishes original reports and reviews on all aspects of infection in humans and animals. Particular emphasis is given to the epidemiology, prevention and control of infectious diseases. The scope covers the zoonoses, outbreaks, food hygiene, vaccine studies, statistics and the clinical, social and public-health aspects of infectious disease, as well as some tropical infections. It has become the key international periodical in which to find the latest reports on recently discovered infections and new technology. For those concerned with policy and planning for the control of infections, the papers on mathematical modelling of epidemics caused by historical, current and emergent infections are of particular value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信