双赢的更可持续的醋酸合成路线。

IF 7.3 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c07324
Juan D Medrano-García, Raul Calvo-Serrano, Haining Tian, Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez
{"title":"双赢的更可持续的醋酸合成路线。","authors":"Juan D Medrano-García, Raul Calvo-Serrano, Haining Tian, Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez","doi":"10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c07324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current efforts to decarbonize the chemical sector by using captured CO<sub>2</sub> and electrolytic H<sub>2</sub> typically lead to high production costs and environmental collateral damage. Hence, there is a clear need to look for alternative, more efficient synthesis routes that could pave the way for a fully sustainable chemical industry. Bearing this in mind, here, we evaluate the economic and environmental implications of two low technology readiness level (TRL) novel single-step synthesis routes for acetic acid production using CO<sub>2</sub> as a raw material: gas-to-acid methane carboxylation and semiartificial photosynthesis. Using process simulation and life-cycle assessment, we determine that these pathways, under a specific set of assumptions, could outperform the business-as-usual methanol carbonylation process at their current development state in terms of global warming, human health, ecosystem quality, and resource scarcity impacts, showing no signs of burden shifting. Furthermore, these routes also result in lower production costs derived from the reduced energy requirement associated with a single synthesis step. Overall, our preliminary results of the low TRL technologies based on experimental data highlight the potential economic and environmental benefits of exploring alternative synthesis routes, which could help bridge the current fossil-based industrial landscape to a more sustainable future.</p>","PeriodicalId":25,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","volume":"13 4","pages":"1522-1531"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Win-Win More Sustainable Routes for Acetic Acid Synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Juan D Medrano-García, Raul Calvo-Serrano, Haining Tian, Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c07324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current efforts to decarbonize the chemical sector by using captured CO<sub>2</sub> and electrolytic H<sub>2</sub> typically lead to high production costs and environmental collateral damage. Hence, there is a clear need to look for alternative, more efficient synthesis routes that could pave the way for a fully sustainable chemical industry. Bearing this in mind, here, we evaluate the economic and environmental implications of two low technology readiness level (TRL) novel single-step synthesis routes for acetic acid production using CO<sub>2</sub> as a raw material: gas-to-acid methane carboxylation and semiartificial photosynthesis. Using process simulation and life-cycle assessment, we determine that these pathways, under a specific set of assumptions, could outperform the business-as-usual methanol carbonylation process at their current development state in terms of global warming, human health, ecosystem quality, and resource scarcity impacts, showing no signs of burden shifting. Furthermore, these routes also result in lower production costs derived from the reduced energy requirement associated with a single synthesis step. Overall, our preliminary results of the low TRL technologies based on experimental data highlight the potential economic and environmental benefits of exploring alternative synthesis routes, which could help bridge the current fossil-based industrial landscape to a more sustainable future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":25,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"1522-1531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795521/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c07324\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c07324","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,通过使用捕获的二氧化碳和电解氢气使化工行业脱碳的努力通常会导致高生产成本和环境附带损害。因此,显然需要寻找替代的、更有效的合成路线,为完全可持续的化学工业铺平道路。考虑到这一点,在这里,我们评估了两种低技术准备水平(TRL)的新型单步合成路线的经济和环境影响,以二氧化碳为原料:气制酸甲烷羧化和半人工光合作用。通过过程模拟和生命周期评估,我们确定,在一组特定的假设下,这些途径在目前的发展状态下,在全球变暖、人类健康、生态系统质量和资源稀缺影响方面,可能优于常规的甲醇羰基化过程,没有显示出负担转移的迹象。此外,由于单个合成步骤所需的能量减少,这些路线还降低了生产成本。总的来说,我们基于实验数据的低TRL技术的初步结果突出了探索替代合成路线的潜在经济和环境效益,这可能有助于将当前以化石为基础的工业景观连接到更可持续的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Win-Win More Sustainable Routes for Acetic Acid Synthesis.

Current efforts to decarbonize the chemical sector by using captured CO2 and electrolytic H2 typically lead to high production costs and environmental collateral damage. Hence, there is a clear need to look for alternative, more efficient synthesis routes that could pave the way for a fully sustainable chemical industry. Bearing this in mind, here, we evaluate the economic and environmental implications of two low technology readiness level (TRL) novel single-step synthesis routes for acetic acid production using CO2 as a raw material: gas-to-acid methane carboxylation and semiartificial photosynthesis. Using process simulation and life-cycle assessment, we determine that these pathways, under a specific set of assumptions, could outperform the business-as-usual methanol carbonylation process at their current development state in terms of global warming, human health, ecosystem quality, and resource scarcity impacts, showing no signs of burden shifting. Furthermore, these routes also result in lower production costs derived from the reduced energy requirement associated with a single synthesis step. Overall, our preliminary results of the low TRL technologies based on experimental data highlight the potential economic and environmental benefits of exploring alternative synthesis routes, which could help bridge the current fossil-based industrial landscape to a more sustainable future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1470
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is a prestigious weekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society. Dedicated to advancing the principles of green chemistry and green engineering, it covers a wide array of research topics including green chemistry, green engineering, biomass, alternative energy, and life cycle assessment. The journal welcomes submissions in various formats, including Letters, Articles, Features, and Perspectives (Reviews), that address the challenges of sustainability in the chemical enterprise and contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable chemistry and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信