对标量子计算机

IF 39.5 1区 物理与天体物理 Q1 PHYSICS, APPLIED
Timothy Proctor, Kevin Young, Andrew D. Baczewski, Robin Blume-Kohout
{"title":"对标量子计算机","authors":"Timothy Proctor, Kevin Young, Andrew D. Baczewski, Robin Blume-Kohout","doi":"10.1038/s42254-024-00796-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid pace of development in quantum computing technology has sparked a proliferation of benchmarks to assess the performance of quantum computing hardware and software. However, not all benchmarks are of equal merit. Good ones empower scientists, engineers, programmers and users to understand the power of a computing system, whereas bad ones can misdirect research and inhibit progress. In this Perspective, we survey the science of quantum computer benchmarking. We discuss the role of benchmarks and benchmarking and how good benchmarks can drive and measure progress towards the long-term goal of useful quantum computations, known as quantum utility. We explain how different kinds of benchmark quantify the performance of different parts of a quantum computer, discuss existing benchmarks, examine recent trends in benchmarking, and highlight important open research questions in this field. Although quantum computers are still in their infancy, their computational power is growing rapidly. This Perspective surveys and critiques the known ways to benchmark quantum computer performance, highlighting new challenges anticipated on the road to utility-scale quantum computing.","PeriodicalId":19024,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Physics","volume":"7 2","pages":"105-118"},"PeriodicalIF":39.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking quantum computers\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Proctor, Kevin Young, Andrew D. Baczewski, Robin Blume-Kohout\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s42254-024-00796-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rapid pace of development in quantum computing technology has sparked a proliferation of benchmarks to assess the performance of quantum computing hardware and software. However, not all benchmarks are of equal merit. Good ones empower scientists, engineers, programmers and users to understand the power of a computing system, whereas bad ones can misdirect research and inhibit progress. In this Perspective, we survey the science of quantum computer benchmarking. We discuss the role of benchmarks and benchmarking and how good benchmarks can drive and measure progress towards the long-term goal of useful quantum computations, known as quantum utility. We explain how different kinds of benchmark quantify the performance of different parts of a quantum computer, discuss existing benchmarks, examine recent trends in benchmarking, and highlight important open research questions in this field. Although quantum computers are still in their infancy, their computational power is growing rapidly. This Perspective surveys and critiques the known ways to benchmark quantum computer performance, highlighting new challenges anticipated on the road to utility-scale quantum computing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Physics\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"105-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":39.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42254-024-00796-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42254-024-00796-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

量子计算技术的快速发展引发了评估量子计算硬件和软件性能的基准的激增。然而,并不是所有的基准都有同样的优点。好的规则使科学家、工程师、程序员和用户能够理解计算系统的能力,而糟糕的规则则会误导研究并阻碍进步。从这个角度来看,我们调查了量子计算机基准测试的科学。我们讨论了基准测试和基准测试的作用,以及良好的基准测试如何推动和衡量朝着有用量子计算的长期目标(称为量子效用)的进展。我们解释了不同类型的基准如何量化量子计算机不同部分的性能,讨论了现有的基准,研究了基准测试的最新趋势,并强调了该领域重要的开放研究问题。尽管量子计算机仍处于起步阶段,但其计算能力正在迅速增长。本展望对量子计算机性能基准测试的已知方法进行了调查和批评,强调了在通往公用事业规模量子计算的道路上预期的新挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Benchmarking quantum computers

Benchmarking quantum computers
The rapid pace of development in quantum computing technology has sparked a proliferation of benchmarks to assess the performance of quantum computing hardware and software. However, not all benchmarks are of equal merit. Good ones empower scientists, engineers, programmers and users to understand the power of a computing system, whereas bad ones can misdirect research and inhibit progress. In this Perspective, we survey the science of quantum computer benchmarking. We discuss the role of benchmarks and benchmarking and how good benchmarks can drive and measure progress towards the long-term goal of useful quantum computations, known as quantum utility. We explain how different kinds of benchmark quantify the performance of different parts of a quantum computer, discuss existing benchmarks, examine recent trends in benchmarking, and highlight important open research questions in this field. Although quantum computers are still in their infancy, their computational power is growing rapidly. This Perspective surveys and critiques the known ways to benchmark quantum computer performance, highlighting new challenges anticipated on the road to utility-scale quantum computing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
47.80
自引率
0.50%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Physics is an online-only reviews journal, part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals. It publishes high-quality technical reference, review, and commentary articles in all areas of fundamental and applied physics. The journal offers a range of content types, including Reviews, Perspectives, Roadmaps, Technical Reviews, Expert Recommendations, Comments, Editorials, Research Highlights, Features, and News & Views, which cover significant advances in the field and topical issues. Nature Reviews Physics is published monthly from January 2019 and does not have external, academic editors. Instead, all editorial decisions are made by a dedicated team of full-time professional editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信