IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Hongyu Luo, Limin Zhang, Jian He, Jiawen Zhou
{"title":"Performance of debris flow barriers: an energy perspective","authors":"Hongyu Luo,&nbsp;Limin Zhang,&nbsp;Jian He,&nbsp;Jiawen Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s11440-024-02430-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Barrier systems are widely applied to impede or retain debris flows. Due to complex flow characteristics and the lack of accurate measurements, the performance of different types of debris flow barriers is difficult to quantify. In this study, a coupled DEM-ALE-FEM method is employed to offer an insight into energy dissipation mechanisms in flow-barrier interactions. Two energy criteria are proposed to evaluate the energy dissipation efficiencies and impact forces of three common types of barriers (rigid barriers, baffles and flexible barriers). The simulation results reveal that a large channel slope or a high solid concentration of debris flow enhances the energy transfer process for all barrier types. The overflow effect is a key factor for barrier type selection. Under significant overflow conditions, the baffle structure outperforms the other two barrier types in terms of both energy transfer and dissipation efficiency. The efficiency of a rigid barrier is sensitive to the barrier height, which is determined by the runup height. The rigid barrier performs better with the increase in barrier height. The flexible net barrier with a smaller net opening than the solid particle size is a good option that balances energy dissipation efficiency and construction cost, especially for flows of high solid concentrations. The rigid barrier outperforms the other two barrier types for debris flows of low solid concentrations. The in-depth study of the barrier energy dissipation efficiency as carried out here facilitates the selection and design of barriers in mitigating debris flow hazards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 2","pages":"987 - 1000"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-024-02430-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

屏障系统被广泛应用于阻碍或阻挡泥石流。由于复杂的流动特性和缺乏精确的测量,很难量化不同类型泥石流屏障的性能。本研究采用了 DEM-ALE-FEM 耦合方法,以深入了解流障相互作用中的能量耗散机制。提出了两种能量标准,以评估三种常见屏障(刚性屏障、挡板和柔性屏障)的消能效率和冲击力。模拟结果表明,对于所有类型的障碍物而言,较大的渠道坡度或较高的泥石流固体浓度都会增强能量传递过程。溢流效应是选择屏障类型的关键因素。在明显的溢流条件下,挡板结构在能量传递和耗散效率方面都优于其他两种类型的阻挡层。刚性阻挡层的效率对阻挡层高度很敏感,而阻挡层高度则由溢流高度决定。刚性阻挡层的性能随着阻挡层高度的增加而提高。净开口小于固体颗粒尺寸的柔性网状阻挡层是兼顾能量耗散效率和建造成本的良好选择,尤其是对于固体浓度较高的水流。对于固体浓度较低的泥石流,刚性阻挡层的性能优于其他两种阻挡层。本文对屏障能量耗散效率的深入研究有助于选择和设计屏障,减轻泥石流的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of debris flow barriers: an energy perspective

Barrier systems are widely applied to impede or retain debris flows. Due to complex flow characteristics and the lack of accurate measurements, the performance of different types of debris flow barriers is difficult to quantify. In this study, a coupled DEM-ALE-FEM method is employed to offer an insight into energy dissipation mechanisms in flow-barrier interactions. Two energy criteria are proposed to evaluate the energy dissipation efficiencies and impact forces of three common types of barriers (rigid barriers, baffles and flexible barriers). The simulation results reveal that a large channel slope or a high solid concentration of debris flow enhances the energy transfer process for all barrier types. The overflow effect is a key factor for barrier type selection. Under significant overflow conditions, the baffle structure outperforms the other two barrier types in terms of both energy transfer and dissipation efficiency. The efficiency of a rigid barrier is sensitive to the barrier height, which is determined by the runup height. The rigid barrier performs better with the increase in barrier height. The flexible net barrier with a smaller net opening than the solid particle size is a good option that balances energy dissipation efficiency and construction cost, especially for flows of high solid concentrations. The rigid barrier outperforms the other two barrier types for debris flows of low solid concentrations. The in-depth study of the barrier energy dissipation efficiency as carried out here facilitates the selection and design of barriers in mitigating debris flow hazards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Geotechnica
Acta Geotechnica ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
17.50%
发文量
297
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信