打破盒子:档案实践与混乱中的尊严

IF 1.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Lingyu Wang
{"title":"打破盒子:档案实践与混乱中的尊严","authors":"Lingyu Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10502-025-09474-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Archival boxes are both practical and conceptual objects, and systems and practices are built around their logic. In this paper, I start by examining uses of literal boxes in very mundane and day-to-day archival works. I go on to discuss how these objects embody an aesthetics of spatial order, historicization, and sanitization. I offer a critique of the box logic as the center of the archival order, and the very basic point of divergence from what communities need, in ways that are both technical and critical. And I compare these archival boxes to seemingly “messy” community practices beyond the boxes. Toward the end, I also provide my own preliminary answer to what we archival researchers and practitioners can do to break out of physical and metaphorical boxes, especially in archival processing. To me, dignity by design is like everyday resistance: it is not only about ethics, slogans, and high goals, but needs to engage these very mundane practices, objects, and systems, and to reimagine them through critique if not art. After all, dignity boils down to these accumulated unassuming moments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46131,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking the boxes: archival praxes and dignity in messiness\",\"authors\":\"Lingyu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10502-025-09474-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Archival boxes are both practical and conceptual objects, and systems and practices are built around their logic. In this paper, I start by examining uses of literal boxes in very mundane and day-to-day archival works. I go on to discuss how these objects embody an aesthetics of spatial order, historicization, and sanitization. I offer a critique of the box logic as the center of the archival order, and the very basic point of divergence from what communities need, in ways that are both technical and critical. And I compare these archival boxes to seemingly “messy” community practices beyond the boxes. Toward the end, I also provide my own preliminary answer to what we archival researchers and practitioners can do to break out of physical and metaphorical boxes, especially in archival processing. To me, dignity by design is like everyday resistance: it is not only about ethics, slogans, and high goals, but needs to engage these very mundane practices, objects, and systems, and to reimagine them through critique if not art. After all, dignity boils down to these accumulated unassuming moments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09474-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09474-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

档案箱既是实用的,也是概念性的对象,系统和实践都是围绕着它们的逻辑建立起来的。在本文中,我首先研究了文字框在非常平凡和日常的档案工作中的使用。我将继续讨论这些物体如何体现空间秩序、历史化和净化的美学。我对作为档案秩序中心的盒子逻辑进行了批判,并以技术和批判性的方式提出了与社区需求相背离的最基本的观点。我将这些档案盒与盒子之外看似“混乱”的社区实践进行了比较。最后,我也提出了我自己的初步答案,即我们档案研究人员和从业人员可以做些什么来打破物理和隐喻的盒子,特别是在档案处理中。对我来说,设计的尊严就像日常的抵抗:它不仅仅是关于道德、口号和高目标,还需要参与这些非常平凡的实践、对象和系统,并通过批评(如果不是艺术的话)重新想象它们。毕竟,尊严可以归结为这些积累起来的谦逊时刻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breaking the boxes: archival praxes and dignity in messiness

Archival boxes are both practical and conceptual objects, and systems and practices are built around their logic. In this paper, I start by examining uses of literal boxes in very mundane and day-to-day archival works. I go on to discuss how these objects embody an aesthetics of spatial order, historicization, and sanitization. I offer a critique of the box logic as the center of the archival order, and the very basic point of divergence from what communities need, in ways that are both technical and critical. And I compare these archival boxes to seemingly “messy” community practices beyond the boxes. Toward the end, I also provide my own preliminary answer to what we archival researchers and practitioners can do to break out of physical and metaphorical boxes, especially in archival processing. To me, dignity by design is like everyday resistance: it is not only about ethics, slogans, and high goals, but needs to engage these very mundane practices, objects, and systems, and to reimagine them through critique if not art. After all, dignity boils down to these accumulated unassuming moments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice. Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world.Archival Science''s approach is integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural. Its scope encompasses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context. To meet its objectives, the journal draws from scientific disciplines that deal with the function of records and the way they are created, preserved, and retrieved; the context in which information is generated, managed, and used; and the social and cultural environment of records creation at different times and places.Covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practiceInvestigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and dataPromotes the exchange and comparison of concepts, views, and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the worldAddresses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信