利什曼原虫感染巨噬细胞固定和染色与培养中恢复原马鞭毛体方法的比较研究

IF 1.5 3区 农林科学 Q4 PARASITOLOGY
Santiago Aguiar Espellet Soares, André Murilo de Souza Marques, José Rodrigues do Carmo-Neto, Clayson Moura Gomes, Grazzielle Guimarães de Matos, Milton Adriano Pelli de Oliveira
{"title":"利什曼原虫感染巨噬细胞固定和染色与培养中恢复原马鞭毛体方法的比较研究","authors":"Santiago Aguiar Espellet Soares,&nbsp;André Murilo de Souza Marques,&nbsp;José Rodrigues do Carmo-Neto,&nbsp;Clayson Moura Gomes,&nbsp;Grazzielle Guimarães de Matos,&nbsp;Milton Adriano Pelli de Oliveira","doi":"10.1007/s11686-025-00990-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Infection of macrophages is a mandatory step for <i>Lesihmania</i> to promote mammalian infection and the evaluation of parasites proliferating inside macrophages reveals important information about parasites virulence and leishmanicidal drugs. Here we compare macrophage phagocytosis ability and amastigote proliferation of <i>L. major</i> or <i>L. braziliensis</i> by two different methods: fixation and staining of infected macrophages or recovery of promastigotes in culture.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Promastigote parasites were used to infect thioglycolate-elicited BALB/c mice peritoneal macrophages. Phagocytosis was evaluated at 3 h after infection and amastigote proliferation was evaluated directly or indirectly at 3, 6, and 9 days after infection.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Phagocytosis of <i>L. major</i> and <i>L. braziliensis</i> by murine macrophages was respectively 54.38 ± 10.41% and 62.54 ± 19.01%, according to the fixation and staining method. The infection index (product of the percentage of infected cells X the number of parasites per cell) obtained by fixation and staining method showed proliferation of <i>L. major</i> inside macrophage from 108.42 ± 25.57 (3 h) to 510.09 ± 99.13 (9 days) and decrease of the number of <i>L. braziliensis</i> from 223.01 ± 58.46 (3 h) to 101.37 ± 20.06 (9 days). The parasites recovered/ mL in culture increased for <i>L. major</i> infected macrophage from 2,38 × 10<sup>6</sup> ± 2,31 × 10<sup>6</sup> (3 h) to 16,8 × 10<sup>6</sup> ± 8,3 × 10<sup>6</sup> (9 days) and decreased from 8.43 × 10<sup>6</sup> ± 6.8 × 10<sup>6</sup> (3 h) to 0.19 × 10<sup>6</sup> ± 0.21 × 10<sup>6</sup> (9 days) for <i>L. braziliensis</i> infected macrophage. The fixation and staining method allowed to observe that both parasite species proliferated inside of some macrophages, while other macrophages maintain the parasite number unaltered or even kill the parasite.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Both methods showed that <i>L. major</i> proliferates in vitro inside of murine macrophages while <i>L. braziliensis</i> are mostly eliminated by these cells. Only fixation and staining allowed to identify <i>L. braziliensis</i> susceptible macrophages in vitro.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6932,"journal":{"name":"Acta Parasitologica","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Methods Fixation and Staining of Infected Macrophages with Recovery of Promastigotes in Culture to Evaluate Phagocytosis and Amastigote Proliferation of Leishmania sp. in vitro\",\"authors\":\"Santiago Aguiar Espellet Soares,&nbsp;André Murilo de Souza Marques,&nbsp;José Rodrigues do Carmo-Neto,&nbsp;Clayson Moura Gomes,&nbsp;Grazzielle Guimarães de Matos,&nbsp;Milton Adriano Pelli de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11686-025-00990-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Infection of macrophages is a mandatory step for <i>Lesihmania</i> to promote mammalian infection and the evaluation of parasites proliferating inside macrophages reveals important information about parasites virulence and leishmanicidal drugs. Here we compare macrophage phagocytosis ability and amastigote proliferation of <i>L. major</i> or <i>L. braziliensis</i> by two different methods: fixation and staining of infected macrophages or recovery of promastigotes in culture.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Promastigote parasites were used to infect thioglycolate-elicited BALB/c mice peritoneal macrophages. Phagocytosis was evaluated at 3 h after infection and amastigote proliferation was evaluated directly or indirectly at 3, 6, and 9 days after infection.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Phagocytosis of <i>L. major</i> and <i>L. braziliensis</i> by murine macrophages was respectively 54.38 ± 10.41% and 62.54 ± 19.01%, according to the fixation and staining method. The infection index (product of the percentage of infected cells X the number of parasites per cell) obtained by fixation and staining method showed proliferation of <i>L. major</i> inside macrophage from 108.42 ± 25.57 (3 h) to 510.09 ± 99.13 (9 days) and decrease of the number of <i>L. braziliensis</i> from 223.01 ± 58.46 (3 h) to 101.37 ± 20.06 (9 days). The parasites recovered/ mL in culture increased for <i>L. major</i> infected macrophage from 2,38 × 10<sup>6</sup> ± 2,31 × 10<sup>6</sup> (3 h) to 16,8 × 10<sup>6</sup> ± 8,3 × 10<sup>6</sup> (9 days) and decreased from 8.43 × 10<sup>6</sup> ± 6.8 × 10<sup>6</sup> (3 h) to 0.19 × 10<sup>6</sup> ± 0.21 × 10<sup>6</sup> (9 days) for <i>L. braziliensis</i> infected macrophage. The fixation and staining method allowed to observe that both parasite species proliferated inside of some macrophages, while other macrophages maintain the parasite number unaltered or even kill the parasite.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Both methods showed that <i>L. major</i> proliferates in vitro inside of murine macrophages while <i>L. braziliensis</i> are mostly eliminated by these cells. Only fixation and staining allowed to identify <i>L. braziliensis</i> susceptible macrophages in vitro.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Parasitologica\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Parasitologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11686-025-00990-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Parasitologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11686-025-00990-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的巨噬细胞感染是利什曼原虫促进哺乳动物感染的必要步骤,对巨噬细胞内寄生虫增殖的评价为寄生虫毒力和利什曼原虫药物的研究提供了重要信息。本文采用两种不同的方法对巴西乳杆菌和巴西乳杆菌的巨噬细胞吞噬能力和无尾螺旋体增殖进行了比较:对感染的巨噬细胞进行固定和染色或在培养中恢复无尾螺旋体。方法采用巯基乙酸诱导的BALB/c小鼠腹腔巨噬细胞感染promastigote寄生虫。在感染后3小时评估吞噬能力,在感染后3、6、9天直接或间接评估无尾螺旋体增殖。结果小鼠巨噬细胞对大乳杆菌和巴西乳杆菌的吞噬率分别为54.38±10.41%和62.54±19.01%。固定染色法测定的感染指数(感染细胞百分比与每细胞寄生虫数的积)显示,巨噬细胞内大乳杆菌的增殖从108.42±25.57 (3 h)增加到510.09±99.13 (9 d),巴西乳杆菌的数量从223.01±58.46 (3 h)减少到101.37±20.06 (9 d)。巴西乳杆菌感染的巨噬细胞中每mL的寄生虫回收率从2,38 × 106±2,31 × 106 (3 h)增加到16,8 × 106±8,3 × 106 (9 d),从8.43 × 106±6.8 × 106 (3 h)减少到0.19 × 106±0.21 × 106 (9 d)。固定和染色方法可以观察到两种寄生虫在一些巨噬细胞内增殖,而另一些巨噬细胞保持寄生虫数量不变甚至杀死寄生虫。结论两种方法均表明,巴西乳杆菌在小鼠巨噬细胞内增殖,而巴西乳杆菌大部分被巨噬细胞清除。只有固定和染色才能在体外鉴定巴西乳杆菌敏感的巨噬细胞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of the Methods Fixation and Staining of Infected Macrophages with Recovery of Promastigotes in Culture to Evaluate Phagocytosis and Amastigote Proliferation of Leishmania sp. in vitro

Comparison of the Methods Fixation and Staining of Infected Macrophages with Recovery of Promastigotes in Culture to Evaluate Phagocytosis and Amastigote Proliferation of Leishmania sp. in vitro

Purpose

Infection of macrophages is a mandatory step for Lesihmania to promote mammalian infection and the evaluation of parasites proliferating inside macrophages reveals important information about parasites virulence and leishmanicidal drugs. Here we compare macrophage phagocytosis ability and amastigote proliferation of L. major or L. braziliensis by two different methods: fixation and staining of infected macrophages or recovery of promastigotes in culture.

Methods

Promastigote parasites were used to infect thioglycolate-elicited BALB/c mice peritoneal macrophages. Phagocytosis was evaluated at 3 h after infection and amastigote proliferation was evaluated directly or indirectly at 3, 6, and 9 days after infection.

Results

Phagocytosis of L. major and L. braziliensis by murine macrophages was respectively 54.38 ± 10.41% and 62.54 ± 19.01%, according to the fixation and staining method. The infection index (product of the percentage of infected cells X the number of parasites per cell) obtained by fixation and staining method showed proliferation of L. major inside macrophage from 108.42 ± 25.57 (3 h) to 510.09 ± 99.13 (9 days) and decrease of the number of L. braziliensis from 223.01 ± 58.46 (3 h) to 101.37 ± 20.06 (9 days). The parasites recovered/ mL in culture increased for L. major infected macrophage from 2,38 × 106 ± 2,31 × 106 (3 h) to 16,8 × 106 ± 8,3 × 106 (9 days) and decreased from 8.43 × 106 ± 6.8 × 106 (3 h) to 0.19 × 106 ± 0.21 × 106 (9 days) for L. braziliensis infected macrophage. The fixation and staining method allowed to observe that both parasite species proliferated inside of some macrophages, while other macrophages maintain the parasite number unaltered or even kill the parasite.

Conclusion

Both methods showed that L. major proliferates in vitro inside of murine macrophages while L. braziliensis are mostly eliminated by these cells. Only fixation and staining allowed to identify L. braziliensis susceptible macrophages in vitro.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Parasitologica
Acta Parasitologica 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Parasitologica is an international journal covering the latest advances in the subject. Acta Parasitologica publishes original papers on all aspects of parasitology and host-parasite relationships, including the latest discoveries in biochemical and molecular biology of parasites, their physiology, morphology, taxonomy and ecology, as well as original research papers on immunology, pathology, and epidemiology of parasitic diseases in the context of medical, veterinary and biological sciences. The journal also publishes short research notes, invited review articles, book reviews. The journal was founded in 1953 as "Acta Parasitologica Polonica" by the Polish Parasitological Society and since 1954 has been published by W. Stefanski Institute of Parasitology of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Warsaw. Since 1992 in has appeared as Acta Parasitologica in four issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信