朋友,重罪犯和税务欺诈

Q1 Social Sciences
Carolyn Conn, Linda Campbell
{"title":"朋友,重罪犯和税务欺诈","authors":"Carolyn Conn,&nbsp;Linda Campbell","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This case study is designed for use in an income tax, accounting ethics, or fraud examination course at the undergraduate or graduate level. The focus is on a<!--> <!-->graduate student (the protagonist) who is near graduation and is wrestling with an ethical dilemma after being asked to provide a character reference for a longtime friend. This student recently passed one of the three core sections of the CPA examination and at the end of the current semester will begin a career as a tax accountant. The recent message from a high school classmate creates a conflict between the student’s personal and professional ethics and causes her to evaluate the importance of her own goals against loyalty to the friend who has confessed to multiple felonies.</div><div>In evaluating the friend’s crimes, the student explores aspects of the fraud triangle and how it might have influenced the friend’s actions. The friend had confessed to wire fraud, bank fraud, and submitting fraudulent loan applications to financial institutions related to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP under the CARES Act<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span>). The case provides a context for discussing multiple aspects of the PPP as an example of a well-intended government program that was susceptible to fraud, analyzing worker classification (employees vs. contract labor/independent contractors), considering the role of tax policy in economic stimulus, and the tradeoffs between providing timely economic relief and crafting carefully designed legislation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 100950"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Friends, felons, & tax fraud\",\"authors\":\"Carolyn Conn,&nbsp;Linda Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This case study is designed for use in an income tax, accounting ethics, or fraud examination course at the undergraduate or graduate level. The focus is on a<!--> <!-->graduate student (the protagonist) who is near graduation and is wrestling with an ethical dilemma after being asked to provide a character reference for a longtime friend. This student recently passed one of the three core sections of the CPA examination and at the end of the current semester will begin a career as a tax accountant. The recent message from a high school classmate creates a conflict between the student’s personal and professional ethics and causes her to evaluate the importance of her own goals against loyalty to the friend who has confessed to multiple felonies.</div><div>In evaluating the friend’s crimes, the student explores aspects of the fraud triangle and how it might have influenced the friend’s actions. The friend had confessed to wire fraud, bank fraud, and submitting fraudulent loan applications to financial institutions related to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP under the CARES Act<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span>). The case provides a context for discussing multiple aspects of the PPP as an example of a well-intended government program that was susceptible to fraud, analyzing worker classification (employees vs. contract labor/independent contractors), considering the role of tax policy in economic stimulus, and the tradeoffs between providing timely economic relief and crafting carefully designed legislation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100950\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575125000016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575125000016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本案例研究旨在用于所得税,会计道德,或欺诈考试课程在本科或研究生水平。故事的焦点是一名即将毕业的研究生(主角),在被要求为一位老朋友提供人品证明后,他陷入了道德困境。这个学生最近通过了注册会计师考试的三个核心部分之一,在本学期结束时将开始税务会计师的职业生涯。最近,一位高中同学发来的信息在她的个人道德和职业道德之间产生了冲突,并使她对自己的目标和对一个已经承认多项重罪的朋友的忠诚进行了评估。在评估朋友的罪行时,学生探索欺诈三角关系的各个方面,以及它可能如何影响朋友的行为。这位朋友承认犯有电信欺诈、银行欺诈,并向与“工资保护计划”(美国《关怀法案》下的PPP)有关的金融机构提交了欺诈性贷款申请。本案例提供了一个背景,用于讨论PPP的多个方面,作为一个善意的政府项目容易受到欺诈的例子,分析工人分类(雇员与合同工/独立承包商),考虑税收政策在经济刺激中的作用,以及提供及时的经济救济和精心设计的立法之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Friends, felons, & tax fraud
This case study is designed for use in an income tax, accounting ethics, or fraud examination course at the undergraduate or graduate level. The focus is on a graduate student (the protagonist) who is near graduation and is wrestling with an ethical dilemma after being asked to provide a character reference for a longtime friend. This student recently passed one of the three core sections of the CPA examination and at the end of the current semester will begin a career as a tax accountant. The recent message from a high school classmate creates a conflict between the student’s personal and professional ethics and causes her to evaluate the importance of her own goals against loyalty to the friend who has confessed to multiple felonies.
In evaluating the friend’s crimes, the student explores aspects of the fraud triangle and how it might have influenced the friend’s actions. The friend had confessed to wire fraud, bank fraud, and submitting fraudulent loan applications to financial institutions related to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP under the CARES Act1). The case provides a context for discussing multiple aspects of the PPP as an example of a well-intended government program that was susceptible to fraud, analyzing worker classification (employees vs. contract labor/independent contractors), considering the role of tax policy in economic stimulus, and the tradeoffs between providing timely economic relief and crafting carefully designed legislation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Accounting Education
Journal of Accounting Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信