用幸福指数为生态产品定价:以中国为例

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Bangzhu Zhu , Xiaozhen Fan , Ping Wang
{"title":"用幸福指数为生态产品定价:以中国为例","authors":"Bangzhu Zhu ,&nbsp;Xiaozhen Fan ,&nbsp;Ping Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Linkages between eco-products and residents' happiness play a crucial role in global sustainable development. However, few studies have adopted happiness data to price eco-products and focused on the potential impact of eco-products on residents' happiness. In this paper, we match the 2010–2021 China General Social Survey (CGSS) microdata with interprovincial eco-product value and construct an eco-product pricing model based on the life satisfaction approach by measuring the marginal substitution effects of eco-product value and residents' incomes. The results of our study show that eco-product value realization significantly enhances the residents' happiness, which remains valid after a series of endogeneity and robustness tests. Eco-product value realization enhances residents' happiness by improving their perceptions of social fairness and promoting the development of green finance. Environmental regulation positively moderates eco-product value realization and residents' happiness. Based on the eco-product pricing model, the price of eco-products is ¥576.27, implying residents on average are willing to pay ¥576.27 for eco-products. The pricing results exhibit heterogeneity across various factors, including income, age, gender, education, marital status, number of children, workplace, and urban-rural differences. Specifically, residents with middle and high income, youth, male, high education, a high number of children, working in state-owned enterprises, and rural areas exhibit a higher willingness to pay for eco-products. Our study provides new insights into pricing the economic value of eco-products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 107853"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pricing eco-products using happiness data: The case of China\",\"authors\":\"Bangzhu Zhu ,&nbsp;Xiaozhen Fan ,&nbsp;Ping Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Linkages between eco-products and residents' happiness play a crucial role in global sustainable development. However, few studies have adopted happiness data to price eco-products and focused on the potential impact of eco-products on residents' happiness. In this paper, we match the 2010–2021 China General Social Survey (CGSS) microdata with interprovincial eco-product value and construct an eco-product pricing model based on the life satisfaction approach by measuring the marginal substitution effects of eco-product value and residents' incomes. The results of our study show that eco-product value realization significantly enhances the residents' happiness, which remains valid after a series of endogeneity and robustness tests. Eco-product value realization enhances residents' happiness by improving their perceptions of social fairness and promoting the development of green finance. Environmental regulation positively moderates eco-product value realization and residents' happiness. Based on the eco-product pricing model, the price of eco-products is ¥576.27, implying residents on average are willing to pay ¥576.27 for eco-products. The pricing results exhibit heterogeneity across various factors, including income, age, gender, education, marital status, number of children, workplace, and urban-rural differences. Specifically, residents with middle and high income, youth, male, high education, a high number of children, working in state-owned enterprises, and rural areas exhibit a higher willingness to pay for eco-products. Our study provides new insights into pricing the economic value of eco-products.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107853\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525000502\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525000502","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态产品与居民幸福感之间的关系在全球可持续发展中发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,很少有研究采用幸福感数据对生态产品进行定价,并关注生态产品对居民幸福感的潜在影响。本文将2010-2021年中国综合社会调查(CGSS)微观数据与省际生态产品价值进行匹配,通过衡量生态产品价值与居民收入的边际替代效应,构建基于生活满意度方法的生态产品定价模型。研究结果表明,生态产品价值实现显著提高了居民的幸福感,经过一系列内生性检验和稳健性检验,这一结论仍然有效。生态产品价值的实现通过提高居民的社会公平感和促进绿色金融的发展来提高居民的幸福感。环境规制正向调节生态产品价值实现和居民幸福感。基于生态产品定价模型,生态产品的价格为576.27元,即居民平均愿意为生态产品支付576.27元。在收入、年龄、性别、受教育程度、婚姻状况、子女数量、工作场所和城乡差异等因素的影响下,定价结果呈现异质性。具体而言,中高收入、青年、男性、高学历、高子女、国有企业工作人员和农村地区的居民对生态产品的支付意愿更高。我们的研究为生态产品的经济价值定价提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pricing eco-products using happiness data: The case of China
Linkages between eco-products and residents' happiness play a crucial role in global sustainable development. However, few studies have adopted happiness data to price eco-products and focused on the potential impact of eco-products on residents' happiness. In this paper, we match the 2010–2021 China General Social Survey (CGSS) microdata with interprovincial eco-product value and construct an eco-product pricing model based on the life satisfaction approach by measuring the marginal substitution effects of eco-product value and residents' incomes. The results of our study show that eco-product value realization significantly enhances the residents' happiness, which remains valid after a series of endogeneity and robustness tests. Eco-product value realization enhances residents' happiness by improving their perceptions of social fairness and promoting the development of green finance. Environmental regulation positively moderates eco-product value realization and residents' happiness. Based on the eco-product pricing model, the price of eco-products is ¥576.27, implying residents on average are willing to pay ¥576.27 for eco-products. The pricing results exhibit heterogeneity across various factors, including income, age, gender, education, marital status, number of children, workplace, and urban-rural differences. Specifically, residents with middle and high income, youth, male, high education, a high number of children, working in state-owned enterprises, and rural areas exhibit a higher willingness to pay for eco-products. Our study provides new insights into pricing the economic value of eco-products.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信