心理灵活性和不灵活性维度之间的纵向关联:一个交叉滞后的面板网络分析

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Wei (Gabriel) Qi , Jie Wen , Zhiwei Zhou, Miao Miao
{"title":"心理灵活性和不灵活性维度之间的纵向关联:一个交叉滞后的面板网络分析","authors":"Wei (Gabriel) Qi ,&nbsp;Jie Wen ,&nbsp;Zhiwei Zhou,&nbsp;Miao Miao","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Psychological flexibility (PF) and psychological inflexibility (PI) are two contrasting concepts central in acceptance and commitment therapy. The multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory (MPFI) could comprehensively assess the 12 factors of PF and PI, thus providing a measure to examine their internal relationships. In the current study, we used the cross-lagged panel network approach to explore the longitudinal associations between the 12 PF/PI components. A sample of 447 Chinese adults (mean age = 31.19, <em>SD</em> = 6.41) completed an online survey at two timepoints. The cross-sectional network revealed the central roles of self-as-context, defusion, fusion and experiential avoidance. The cross-lagged panel network revealed that fusion, committed action, and self-as-context were influential nodes on other dimensions, whereas inaction and defusion had high levels of predictability. The current findings shed new light on the internal structure of the PF/PI components, and elucidated nodes that were central in the cross-sectional status and longitudinal changes. The identified nodes may help inform clinicians of potential loci for intervention, and clarify the theoretical connections within the complex network of psychological flexibility processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100877"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal associations between psychological flexibility and inflexibility dimensions: A cross-lagged panel network analysis\",\"authors\":\"Wei (Gabriel) Qi ,&nbsp;Jie Wen ,&nbsp;Zhiwei Zhou,&nbsp;Miao Miao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Psychological flexibility (PF) and psychological inflexibility (PI) are two contrasting concepts central in acceptance and commitment therapy. The multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory (MPFI) could comprehensively assess the 12 factors of PF and PI, thus providing a measure to examine their internal relationships. In the current study, we used the cross-lagged panel network approach to explore the longitudinal associations between the 12 PF/PI components. A sample of 447 Chinese adults (mean age = 31.19, <em>SD</em> = 6.41) completed an online survey at two timepoints. The cross-sectional network revealed the central roles of self-as-context, defusion, fusion and experiential avoidance. The cross-lagged panel network revealed that fusion, committed action, and self-as-context were influential nodes on other dimensions, whereas inaction and defusion had high levels of predictability. The current findings shed new light on the internal structure of the PF/PI components, and elucidated nodes that were central in the cross-sectional status and longitudinal changes. The identified nodes may help inform clinicians of potential loci for intervention, and clarify the theoretical connections within the complex network of psychological flexibility processes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100877\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144725000080\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144725000080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理弹性(PF)和心理不弹性(PI)是接受与承诺治疗中两个截然不同的概念。多维心理灵活性量表(MPFI)可以综合评价PF和PI的12个因素,从而为检验它们之间的内在关系提供了一种手段。在本研究中,我们使用交叉滞后面板网络方法来探索12个PF/PI分量之间的纵向关联。共有447名中国成年人(平均年龄31.19岁,SD = 6.41)在两个时间点完成了在线调查。横断面网络揭示了自我作为情境、融合、融合和经验回避的核心作用。交叉滞后面板网络显示,融合、承诺行动和自我情境是其他维度上的影响节点,而不作为和融合具有高水平的可预测性。目前的研究结果揭示了PF/PI组件的内部结构,并阐明了在横截面状态和纵向变化中处于中心位置的节点。确定的节点可能有助于告知临床医生潜在的干预位点,并澄清心理灵活性过程复杂网络中的理论联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Longitudinal associations between psychological flexibility and inflexibility dimensions: A cross-lagged panel network analysis
Psychological flexibility (PF) and psychological inflexibility (PI) are two contrasting concepts central in acceptance and commitment therapy. The multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory (MPFI) could comprehensively assess the 12 factors of PF and PI, thus providing a measure to examine their internal relationships. In the current study, we used the cross-lagged panel network approach to explore the longitudinal associations between the 12 PF/PI components. A sample of 447 Chinese adults (mean age = 31.19, SD = 6.41) completed an online survey at two timepoints. The cross-sectional network revealed the central roles of self-as-context, defusion, fusion and experiential avoidance. The cross-lagged panel network revealed that fusion, committed action, and self-as-context were influential nodes on other dimensions, whereas inaction and defusion had high levels of predictability. The current findings shed new light on the internal structure of the PF/PI components, and elucidated nodes that were central in the cross-sectional status and longitudinal changes. The identified nodes may help inform clinicians of potential loci for intervention, and clarify the theoretical connections within the complex network of psychological flexibility processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信