电子微流动研究中的性别数据差距:性别报告的系统回顾

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Katie J. Parnell
{"title":"电子微流动研究中的性别数据差距:性别报告的系统回顾","authors":"Katie J. Parnell","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our transportation systems have encountered male bias in their design and evaluation for many years due to a lack of data from female users. Despite being a relatively new mode of transportation, e-micromobility has had greater uptake by male users from its inception. Yet, the gendered analysis and reporting of e-micromobility has not been analysed in detail on a large scale. This review identified 292 papers across 37 different countries that have conducted participant-based research into e-micromobility, to understand how gender was reported and analysed in the samples used in the studies. This identified that half of all papers reviewed had a male majority sample, while only 15 % had an equal split of male and female participants. 45 % of the studies (<em>n</em> = 133) reported gender differences, suggesting that gender does impact on e-micromobility use, with considerably more data on male users compared to female users. There was also a lack of reporting on non-binary gender data. With the application of gender factors that have been previously established in the transport domain, this review paper also identifies gender data gaps in areas such as care related journeys, encumbered travel and ergonomic design. The importance in accounting for the role of gender in the development of policy targeting e-micromobility is also presented from the findings of the review. The paper calls for more careful consideration of gender in the design and reporting of e-micromobility studies and presents recommendation that are applicable to a broad range of stakeholders in the e-micromobility domain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104127"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The gender data gap in e-micromobility research: A systematic review of gender reporting\",\"authors\":\"Katie J. Parnell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Our transportation systems have encountered male bias in their design and evaluation for many years due to a lack of data from female users. Despite being a relatively new mode of transportation, e-micromobility has had greater uptake by male users from its inception. Yet, the gendered analysis and reporting of e-micromobility has not been analysed in detail on a large scale. This review identified 292 papers across 37 different countries that have conducted participant-based research into e-micromobility, to understand how gender was reported and analysed in the samples used in the studies. This identified that half of all papers reviewed had a male majority sample, while only 15 % had an equal split of male and female participants. 45 % of the studies (<em>n</em> = 133) reported gender differences, suggesting that gender does impact on e-micromobility use, with considerably more data on male users compared to female users. There was also a lack of reporting on non-binary gender data. With the application of gender factors that have been previously established in the transport domain, this review paper also identifies gender data gaps in areas such as care related journeys, encumbered travel and ergonomic design. The importance in accounting for the role of gender in the development of policy targeting e-micromobility is also presented from the findings of the review. The paper calls for more careful consideration of gender in the design and reporting of e-micromobility studies and presents recommendation that are applicable to a broad range of stakeholders in the e-micromobility domain.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport Geography\",\"volume\":\"123 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692325000183\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692325000183","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多年来,由于缺乏女性用户的数据,我们的交通系统在设计和评估中遇到了男性偏见。尽管电子微交通是一种相对较新的交通方式,但从一开始就被男性用户所接受。然而,电子微流动性的性别分析和报告尚未进行大规模的详细分析。本综述确定了来自37个不同国家的292篇论文,这些论文对电子微流动性进行了基于参与者的研究,以了解如何在研究中使用的样本中报告和分析性别。这表明,在所有被审查的论文中,有一半的男性样本占多数,而只有15%的论文男女参与者比例相等。45%的研究(n = 133)报告了性别差异,表明性别确实影响电子微交通工具的使用,与女性用户相比,男性用户的数据要多得多。也缺乏关于非二元性别数据的报告。通过应用先前在交通领域建立的性别因素,本综述论文还确定了与护理相关的旅行、有碍旅行和人体工程学设计等领域的性别数据差距。根据审查的结果,还提出了在制定针对电子微交通的政策时考虑性别作用的重要性。本文呼吁在电子微流动性研究的设计和报告中更仔细地考虑性别因素,并提出了适用于电子微流动性领域广泛利益相关者的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The gender data gap in e-micromobility research: A systematic review of gender reporting
Our transportation systems have encountered male bias in their design and evaluation for many years due to a lack of data from female users. Despite being a relatively new mode of transportation, e-micromobility has had greater uptake by male users from its inception. Yet, the gendered analysis and reporting of e-micromobility has not been analysed in detail on a large scale. This review identified 292 papers across 37 different countries that have conducted participant-based research into e-micromobility, to understand how gender was reported and analysed in the samples used in the studies. This identified that half of all papers reviewed had a male majority sample, while only 15 % had an equal split of male and female participants. 45 % of the studies (n = 133) reported gender differences, suggesting that gender does impact on e-micromobility use, with considerably more data on male users compared to female users. There was also a lack of reporting on non-binary gender data. With the application of gender factors that have been previously established in the transport domain, this review paper also identifies gender data gaps in areas such as care related journeys, encumbered travel and ergonomic design. The importance in accounting for the role of gender in the development of policy targeting e-micromobility is also presented from the findings of the review. The paper calls for more careful consideration of gender in the design and reporting of e-micromobility studies and presents recommendation that are applicable to a broad range of stakeholders in the e-micromobility domain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信