Murat Gül , Ceren Küçükuysal , Göksu Uslular , Gerald Raab , Markus Egli
{"title":"新疆西南地区Çine亚地块中粗砾石沉积的形成与演化:多代理方法","authors":"Murat Gül , Ceren Küçükuysal , Göksu Uslular , Gerald Raab , Markus Egli","doi":"10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Grus deposits may be a key element in deciphering the evolution of granitic landforms due to their rapid formation, sensitivity to environmental factors, and influence on landscape morphology. This study explores the mineralogical, geochemical and structural characteristics of grus deposits developed on granitoid bedrock through subsurface weathering in a semiarid region, the Çine submassif (SW Türkiye), focusing on how topography, mineral composition and climate affect their formation and spatial variability. Two distinct grus types were identified: thinner (0–20 cm), homogenous, sand-rich deposits on upper slopes, and thicker (40–100 cm), heterogenous, gravel-rich layers in the valley and downslope near bedrock outcrops. The bimodal grain-size distributions among grus types may reflect progressive weathering along topographic gradients, where upper slopes experience limited weathering due to reduced water retention and steeper gradients, leading to the formation of thinner, sand-rich deposits. In contrast, downslopes and valleys allow for prolonged water infiltration and feldspar breakdown, resulting in thicker, gravel-rich deposits with a more advanced weathering profile. Grus consists primarily of quartz, albite, orthoclase and mica, with accessory clay minerals such as kaolinite. Geochemical data indicate a felsic grus composition with limited variations, high Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) values (59 to 69 %), and a gradual weathering trend towards kaolinite, driven by feldspar weathering and fluctuating water infiltration along slopes.</div><div>The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) highlights chemical composition and grain size as key parameters differentiating grus types. The interplay of topography, water dynamics, and local structural and mineralogical characteristics controls both the formation and weathering intensity of grus, with variations in deposit characteristics reflecting the influence of slope position and water infiltration on weathering process. These findings provide new insights into granitoid landform evolution, while further geochronological studies are recommended to clarify the temporal evolution of grus mantles and subsurface weathering features across the region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55115,"journal":{"name":"Geomorphology","volume":"474 ","pages":"Article 109641"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formation and evolution of grus deposits in the Çine Submassif, Southwest Türkiye: A multi-proxy approach\",\"authors\":\"Murat Gül , Ceren Küçükuysal , Göksu Uslular , Gerald Raab , Markus Egli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.109641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Grus deposits may be a key element in deciphering the evolution of granitic landforms due to their rapid formation, sensitivity to environmental factors, and influence on landscape morphology. This study explores the mineralogical, geochemical and structural characteristics of grus deposits developed on granitoid bedrock through subsurface weathering in a semiarid region, the Çine submassif (SW Türkiye), focusing on how topography, mineral composition and climate affect their formation and spatial variability. Two distinct grus types were identified: thinner (0–20 cm), homogenous, sand-rich deposits on upper slopes, and thicker (40–100 cm), heterogenous, gravel-rich layers in the valley and downslope near bedrock outcrops. The bimodal grain-size distributions among grus types may reflect progressive weathering along topographic gradients, where upper slopes experience limited weathering due to reduced water retention and steeper gradients, leading to the formation of thinner, sand-rich deposits. In contrast, downslopes and valleys allow for prolonged water infiltration and feldspar breakdown, resulting in thicker, gravel-rich deposits with a more advanced weathering profile. Grus consists primarily of quartz, albite, orthoclase and mica, with accessory clay minerals such as kaolinite. Geochemical data indicate a felsic grus composition with limited variations, high Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) values (59 to 69 %), and a gradual weathering trend towards kaolinite, driven by feldspar weathering and fluctuating water infiltration along slopes.</div><div>The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) highlights chemical composition and grain size as key parameters differentiating grus types. The interplay of topography, water dynamics, and local structural and mineralogical characteristics controls both the formation and weathering intensity of grus, with variations in deposit characteristics reflecting the influence of slope position and water infiltration on weathering process. These findings provide new insights into granitoid landform evolution, while further geochronological studies are recommended to clarify the temporal evolution of grus mantles and subsurface weathering features across the region.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geomorphology\",\"volume\":\"474 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109641\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geomorphology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X25000510\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomorphology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X25000510","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Grus矿床因其形成迅速、对环境因素敏感以及对景观形态的影响,可能是破译花岗岩地貌演化的关键因素。本文研究了半干旱区Çine亚地块(SW t rkiye)花岗岩基岩上经地下风化发育的禾草矿床的矿物学、地球化学和构造特征,重点研究了地形、矿物组成和气候对其形成和空间变异性的影响。发现两种不同类型的砾石:较薄(0-20 cm)、均质、富砂沉积在上斜坡上,较厚(40-100 cm)、非均质、富砾石沉积在靠近基岩露头的山谷和下坡。禾草类型之间的双峰粒度分布可能反映了沿地形梯度的渐进风化,其中上部斜坡由于持水量减少和坡度更陡而受到有限的风化,从而形成更薄、富砂的沉积物。相比之下,下坡和山谷允许长时间的水渗透和长石分解,从而形成更厚、富含砾石的沉积物,具有更先进的风化剖面。Grus主要由石英、钠长石、正长石和云母组成,辅之以高岭石等粘土矿物。地球化学数据表明,长英质砾石组成变化有限,化学蚀变指数(CIA)值较高(59 ~ 69%),在长石风化作用和沿坡波动的水入渗作用的驱动下,高岭石逐渐风化。主成分分析(PCA)强调化学成分和粒度是区分菌种类型的关键参数。地形、水动力、局部构造和矿物学特征的相互作用控制着禾草的形成和风化强度,其沉积特征的变化反映了坡位和水分入渗对风化过程的影响。这些发现为花岗岩地貌演化提供了新的见解,同时建议进一步进行年代学研究,以阐明整个地区花岗岩地幔的时间演化和地下风化特征。
Formation and evolution of grus deposits in the Çine Submassif, Southwest Türkiye: A multi-proxy approach
Grus deposits may be a key element in deciphering the evolution of granitic landforms due to their rapid formation, sensitivity to environmental factors, and influence on landscape morphology. This study explores the mineralogical, geochemical and structural characteristics of grus deposits developed on granitoid bedrock through subsurface weathering in a semiarid region, the Çine submassif (SW Türkiye), focusing on how topography, mineral composition and climate affect their formation and spatial variability. Two distinct grus types were identified: thinner (0–20 cm), homogenous, sand-rich deposits on upper slopes, and thicker (40–100 cm), heterogenous, gravel-rich layers in the valley and downslope near bedrock outcrops. The bimodal grain-size distributions among grus types may reflect progressive weathering along topographic gradients, where upper slopes experience limited weathering due to reduced water retention and steeper gradients, leading to the formation of thinner, sand-rich deposits. In contrast, downslopes and valleys allow for prolonged water infiltration and feldspar breakdown, resulting in thicker, gravel-rich deposits with a more advanced weathering profile. Grus consists primarily of quartz, albite, orthoclase and mica, with accessory clay minerals such as kaolinite. Geochemical data indicate a felsic grus composition with limited variations, high Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) values (59 to 69 %), and a gradual weathering trend towards kaolinite, driven by feldspar weathering and fluctuating water infiltration along slopes.
The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) highlights chemical composition and grain size as key parameters differentiating grus types. The interplay of topography, water dynamics, and local structural and mineralogical characteristics controls both the formation and weathering intensity of grus, with variations in deposit characteristics reflecting the influence of slope position and water infiltration on weathering process. These findings provide new insights into granitoid landform evolution, while further geochronological studies are recommended to clarify the temporal evolution of grus mantles and subsurface weathering features across the region.
期刊介绍:
Our journal''s scope includes geomorphic themes of: tectonics and regional structure; glacial processes and landforms; fluvial sequences, Quaternary environmental change and dating; fluvial processes and landforms; mass movement, slopes and periglacial processes; hillslopes and soil erosion; weathering, karst and soils; aeolian processes and landforms, coastal dunes and arid environments; coastal and marine processes, estuaries and lakes; modelling, theoretical and quantitative geomorphology; DEM, GIS and remote sensing methods and applications; hazards, applied and planetary geomorphology; and volcanics.