利用社会、财务和环境指标比较巴西、法国、西班牙和美国城市公交系统的效率

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Felipe M. Coutinho, Maurício O. de Andrade
{"title":"利用社会、财务和环境指标比较巴西、法国、西班牙和美国城市公交系统的效率","authors":"Felipe M. Coutinho,&nbsp;Maurício O. de Andrade","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.01.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Analyzing efficiency is vital for public transport, given its significant resource consumption and operation in contexts with limited competition. Although the literature has been studying the efficiency of transport systems for a while, the number of studies that compare public transport internationally still needs to be improved. Research indicates that varying political and economic capacities across countries pose considerable challenges to transitioning towards more sustainable mobility. This issue is further exacerbated by the prominent role of subnational governments in public transport governance, as they dispose of fewer resources than their national counterparts. This study introduces an international methodology for evaluating the efficiency of urban bus systems in 50 cities across Brazil, France, Spain, and the USA. The systems were further categorized by population size. The methodology utilizes crew, energy consumption, fleet, CO2 emissions, and urban population as inputs, while fare revenues, catchment area, and ridership serve as outputs. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was applied to the sample across various scenarios. European systems demonstrated the highest efficiencies. Large European and non-large Brazilian systems were the most resilient though different regions displayed sensitivity to distinct metrics. The proposed methodology offers a comprehensive framework for assessing urban bus network efficiency internationally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"164 ","pages":"Pages 217-230"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the efficiency of urban bus systems in Brazil, France, Spain and United States using social, financial, and environmental indicators\",\"authors\":\"Felipe M. Coutinho,&nbsp;Maurício O. de Andrade\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.01.042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Analyzing efficiency is vital for public transport, given its significant resource consumption and operation in contexts with limited competition. Although the literature has been studying the efficiency of transport systems for a while, the number of studies that compare public transport internationally still needs to be improved. Research indicates that varying political and economic capacities across countries pose considerable challenges to transitioning towards more sustainable mobility. This issue is further exacerbated by the prominent role of subnational governments in public transport governance, as they dispose of fewer resources than their national counterparts. This study introduces an international methodology for evaluating the efficiency of urban bus systems in 50 cities across Brazil, France, Spain, and the USA. The systems were further categorized by population size. The methodology utilizes crew, energy consumption, fleet, CO2 emissions, and urban population as inputs, while fare revenues, catchment area, and ridership serve as outputs. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was applied to the sample across various scenarios. European systems demonstrated the highest efficiencies. Large European and non-large Brazilian systems were the most resilient though different regions displayed sensitivity to distinct metrics. The proposed methodology offers a comprehensive framework for assessing urban bus network efficiency internationally.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"164 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 217-230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X2500054X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X2500054X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到公共交通的巨大资源消耗和在有限竞争环境下的运营,分析效率对公共交通至关重要。虽然文献研究交通系统的效率已经有一段时间了,但是比较国际公共交通的研究数量仍然需要改进。研究表明,各国不同的政治和经济能力对向更可持续的交通方式过渡构成了相当大的挑战。地方政府在公共交通治理中的突出作用进一步加剧了这一问题,因为它们处理的资源少于国家政府。本研究介绍了一种评估巴西、法国、西班牙和美国50个城市城市公交系统效率的国际方法。这些系统进一步按人口规模分类。该方法利用乘员、能源消耗、车队、二氧化碳排放和城市人口作为输入,而票价收入、集水区面积和客流量作为输出。数据包络分析(DEA)应用于不同场景的样本。欧洲系统的效率最高。大型欧洲和非大型巴西系统是最具弹性的,尽管不同地区对不同指标表现出敏感性。所提出的方法为国际上评估城市公交网络效率提供了一个全面的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the efficiency of urban bus systems in Brazil, France, Spain and United States using social, financial, and environmental indicators
Analyzing efficiency is vital for public transport, given its significant resource consumption and operation in contexts with limited competition. Although the literature has been studying the efficiency of transport systems for a while, the number of studies that compare public transport internationally still needs to be improved. Research indicates that varying political and economic capacities across countries pose considerable challenges to transitioning towards more sustainable mobility. This issue is further exacerbated by the prominent role of subnational governments in public transport governance, as they dispose of fewer resources than their national counterparts. This study introduces an international methodology for evaluating the efficiency of urban bus systems in 50 cities across Brazil, France, Spain, and the USA. The systems were further categorized by population size. The methodology utilizes crew, energy consumption, fleet, CO2 emissions, and urban population as inputs, while fare revenues, catchment area, and ridership serve as outputs. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was applied to the sample across various scenarios. European systems demonstrated the highest efficiencies. Large European and non-large Brazilian systems were the most resilient though different regions displayed sensitivity to distinct metrics. The proposed methodology offers a comprehensive framework for assessing urban bus network efficiency internationally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信