先发制人倾斜座椅减轻晕车效果的实验研究

IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Nishant Jalgaonkar, Daniel Sousa Schulman, Ming Shao, Saharsh Jaisankar, Brandon Tarter, Nikitha MV, Jacqueline Buford, Sarah Chan, Michael Wachsman, Shorya Awtar
{"title":"先发制人倾斜座椅减轻晕车效果的实验研究","authors":"Nishant Jalgaonkar,&nbsp;Daniel Sousa Schulman,&nbsp;Ming Shao,&nbsp;Saharsh Jaisankar,&nbsp;Brandon Tarter,&nbsp;Nikitha MV,&nbsp;Jacqueline Buford,&nbsp;Sarah Chan,&nbsp;Michael Wachsman,&nbsp;Shorya Awtar","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carsickness (CS) experienced by vehicle passengers is a critical unsolved challenge that impacts existing human-driven vehicles and may limit the adoption of future autonomous vehicles. If CS is reduced, then passengers can perform productive tasks during their commutes. Prior research has demonstrated that a preemptively triggered tilting seat system (TSS), i.e., a seat that tilts the passenger in the direction of the vehicle's turn, can reduce CS response. However, no previous investigations have studied the impact of TSS on passengers performing representative productive tasks when riding a real vehicle under realistic driving conditions. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a human subject study to quantify passenger CS response and assess their task performance in the presence of a preemptively triggered TSS. Twenty-nine healthy adults with varying levels of self-reported motion sickness susceptibility participated in the study across two test conditions. This is the first in-vehicle study that assessed both CS response and passenger task performance for a diverse sample of passengers under realistic driving conditions emulated on a closed test track. The results from this study demonstrated that a preemptively triggered TSS reduces CS scores for male passengers and has no negative influence on their productive task performance. The results also demonstrated that a preemptively triggered TSS did not have an effect on CS scores for female passengers but had a small positive influence on their productive task performance. In addition, the majority of the study participants (∼70%) indicated via a qualitative questionnaire that they would want a preemptively triggered TSS in their car.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104453"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Investigation of the Efficacy of Preemptive Tilting Seats in mitigating Carsickness\",\"authors\":\"Nishant Jalgaonkar,&nbsp;Daniel Sousa Schulman,&nbsp;Ming Shao,&nbsp;Saharsh Jaisankar,&nbsp;Brandon Tarter,&nbsp;Nikitha MV,&nbsp;Jacqueline Buford,&nbsp;Sarah Chan,&nbsp;Michael Wachsman,&nbsp;Shorya Awtar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Carsickness (CS) experienced by vehicle passengers is a critical unsolved challenge that impacts existing human-driven vehicles and may limit the adoption of future autonomous vehicles. If CS is reduced, then passengers can perform productive tasks during their commutes. Prior research has demonstrated that a preemptively triggered tilting seat system (TSS), i.e., a seat that tilts the passenger in the direction of the vehicle's turn, can reduce CS response. However, no previous investigations have studied the impact of TSS on passengers performing representative productive tasks when riding a real vehicle under realistic driving conditions. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a human subject study to quantify passenger CS response and assess their task performance in the presence of a preemptively triggered TSS. Twenty-nine healthy adults with varying levels of self-reported motion sickness susceptibility participated in the study across two test conditions. This is the first in-vehicle study that assessed both CS response and passenger task performance for a diverse sample of passengers under realistic driving conditions emulated on a closed test track. The results from this study demonstrated that a preemptively triggered TSS reduces CS scores for male passengers and has no negative influence on their productive task performance. The results also demonstrated that a preemptively triggered TSS did not have an effect on CS scores for female passengers but had a small positive influence on their productive task performance. In addition, the majority of the study participants (∼70%) indicated via a qualitative questionnaire that they would want a preemptively triggered TSS in their car.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"125 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104453\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687024002308\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687024002308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

汽车乘客晕车(CS)是一个关键的未解决的挑战,它会影响现有的人类驾驶汽车,并可能限制未来自动驾驶汽车的采用。如果减少CS,那么乘客就可以在通勤期间执行富有成效的任务。先前的研究表明,先发制人触发的倾斜座椅系统(TSS),即使乘客向车辆转弯方向倾斜的座椅,可以减少CS响应。然而,在以往的研究中,并没有研究过在真实驾驶条件下驾驶真实车辆时,TSS对执行代表性生产任务的乘客的影响。本文通过提出一项人类受试者研究来解决这一差距,该研究量化了乘客CS反应,并评估了他们在先发制人触发TSS的情况下的任务表现。29名自我报告有不同程度晕动病易感性的健康成年人参与了两种测试条件下的研究。这是首次在封闭测试轨道上模拟真实驾驶条件下,对不同样本的乘客进行CS响应和乘客任务表现评估的车载研究。本研究结果表明,先发制人触发的TSS降低了男性乘客的CS得分,对他们的生产性任务绩效没有负面影响。结果还表明,先发制人触发的TSS对女性乘客的CS分数没有影响,但对她们的生产性任务绩效有很小的积极影响。此外,大多数研究参与者(约70%)通过定性问卷表示,他们希望在他们的汽车中先发制人地触发TSS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental Investigation of the Efficacy of Preemptive Tilting Seats in mitigating Carsickness
Carsickness (CS) experienced by vehicle passengers is a critical unsolved challenge that impacts existing human-driven vehicles and may limit the adoption of future autonomous vehicles. If CS is reduced, then passengers can perform productive tasks during their commutes. Prior research has demonstrated that a preemptively triggered tilting seat system (TSS), i.e., a seat that tilts the passenger in the direction of the vehicle's turn, can reduce CS response. However, no previous investigations have studied the impact of TSS on passengers performing representative productive tasks when riding a real vehicle under realistic driving conditions. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a human subject study to quantify passenger CS response and assess their task performance in the presence of a preemptively triggered TSS. Twenty-nine healthy adults with varying levels of self-reported motion sickness susceptibility participated in the study across two test conditions. This is the first in-vehicle study that assessed both CS response and passenger task performance for a diverse sample of passengers under realistic driving conditions emulated on a closed test track. The results from this study demonstrated that a preemptively triggered TSS reduces CS scores for male passengers and has no negative influence on their productive task performance. The results also demonstrated that a preemptively triggered TSS did not have an effect on CS scores for female passengers but had a small positive influence on their productive task performance. In addition, the majority of the study participants (∼70%) indicated via a qualitative questionnaire that they would want a preemptively triggered TSS in their car.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信