墨西哥为实现工业5.0和可持续发展目标的可再生能源组合:氢能、风能还是太阳能?

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Moein Khazaei , Fatemeh Gholian-Jouybari , Mahdi Davari Dolatabadi , Aryan Pourebrahimi Alamdari , Hamidreza Eskandari , Mostafa Hajiaghaei-Keshteli
{"title":"墨西哥为实现工业5.0和可持续发展目标的可再生能源组合:氢能、风能还是太阳能?","authors":"Moein Khazaei ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Gholian-Jouybari ,&nbsp;Mahdi Davari Dolatabadi ,&nbsp;Aryan Pourebrahimi Alamdari ,&nbsp;Hamidreza Eskandari ,&nbsp;Mostafa Hajiaghaei-Keshteli","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite a surge in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Mexico, like nearshoring, the slow growth in international investment in renewables challenges the country's progress in achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) related to clean energy. To the best of current knowledge, this research is one of the first to explore the integration of renewable energy (Green/Blue/Turquoise Hydrogen, Solar, and Wind plants) in Mexico, emphasizing a diverse portfolio of projects aligned with SDGs and Industry 5.0. While previous works have focused on the nexus between energy, Industry 4.0, and sustainability, the present study advances this discourse by incorporating Industry 5.0 principles and a comprehensive methodological approach. Through a comprehensive methodology involving Value-Focused Thinking (VFT), fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), and multi-objective mathematical programming, the study identifies key criteria encompassing social, economic, environmental, and technological dimensions. The resulting criteria form a robust framework for evaluating project sustainability. The fuzzy DEMATEL analysis reveals intricate interrelations among criteria, emphasizing the need for balanced considerations. Results highlighted job creation, income equality, and microfinance support as key social considerations, while energy-related criteria emphasized sustainable practices. The proposed multi-objective programming model and COmbined COmpromise SOlution (COCOSO) method facilitated the selection of eight projects, with one project as the top-ranked option across various scoring strategies. Overall, this research provides a nuanced roadmap for effective decision-making in renewable energy projects, offering insights into project strengths, weaknesses, and potential areas for improvement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 115420"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Renewable energy portfolio in Mexico for Industry 5.0 and SDGs: Hydrogen, wind, or solar?\",\"authors\":\"Moein Khazaei ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Gholian-Jouybari ,&nbsp;Mahdi Davari Dolatabadi ,&nbsp;Aryan Pourebrahimi Alamdari ,&nbsp;Hamidreza Eskandari ,&nbsp;Mostafa Hajiaghaei-Keshteli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite a surge in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Mexico, like nearshoring, the slow growth in international investment in renewables challenges the country's progress in achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) related to clean energy. To the best of current knowledge, this research is one of the first to explore the integration of renewable energy (Green/Blue/Turquoise Hydrogen, Solar, and Wind plants) in Mexico, emphasizing a diverse portfolio of projects aligned with SDGs and Industry 5.0. While previous works have focused on the nexus between energy, Industry 4.0, and sustainability, the present study advances this discourse by incorporating Industry 5.0 principles and a comprehensive methodological approach. Through a comprehensive methodology involving Value-Focused Thinking (VFT), fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), and multi-objective mathematical programming, the study identifies key criteria encompassing social, economic, environmental, and technological dimensions. The resulting criteria form a robust framework for evaluating project sustainability. The fuzzy DEMATEL analysis reveals intricate interrelations among criteria, emphasizing the need for balanced considerations. Results highlighted job creation, income equality, and microfinance support as key social considerations, while energy-related criteria emphasized sustainable practices. The proposed multi-objective programming model and COmbined COmpromise SOlution (COCOSO) method facilitated the selection of eight projects, with one project as the top-ranked option across various scoring strategies. Overall, this research provides a nuanced roadmap for effective decision-making in renewable energy projects, offering insights into project strengths, weaknesses, and potential areas for improvement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"213 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115420\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125000930\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125000930","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管墨西哥的外国直接投资(FDI)激增,但国际可再生能源投资增长缓慢,这对该国实现与清洁能源相关的可持续发展目标(sdg)的进展构成了挑战。据目前所知,这项研究是墨西哥首批探索可再生能源(绿色/蓝色/绿松石氢、太阳能和风能发电厂)整合的研究之一,强调与可持续发展目标和工业5.0相一致的多样化项目组合。虽然以前的工作集中在能源,工业4.0和可持续性之间的联系,但本研究通过结合工业5.0原则和综合方法方法推进了这一论述。通过一种综合的方法,包括以价值为中心的思维(VFT)、模糊决策试验和评估实验室(DEMATEL)和多目标数学规划,该研究确定了包括社会、经济、环境和技术维度的关键标准。由此产生的标准形成了评估项目可持续性的有力框架。模糊的DEMATEL分析揭示了标准之间错综复杂的相互关系,强调了平衡考虑的必要性。结果强调,创造就业机会、收入平等和小额信贷支持是关键的社会考虑因素,而与能源相关的标准强调可持续实践。提出的多目标规划模型和综合折衷方案(COCOSO)方法促进了8个项目的选择,其中一个项目在各种评分策略中排名最高。总的来说,这项研究为可再生能源项目的有效决策提供了一个细致入微的路线图,提供了对项目优势、劣势和潜在改进领域的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Renewable energy portfolio in Mexico for Industry 5.0 and SDGs: Hydrogen, wind, or solar?
Despite a surge in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Mexico, like nearshoring, the slow growth in international investment in renewables challenges the country's progress in achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) related to clean energy. To the best of current knowledge, this research is one of the first to explore the integration of renewable energy (Green/Blue/Turquoise Hydrogen, Solar, and Wind plants) in Mexico, emphasizing a diverse portfolio of projects aligned with SDGs and Industry 5.0. While previous works have focused on the nexus between energy, Industry 4.0, and sustainability, the present study advances this discourse by incorporating Industry 5.0 principles and a comprehensive methodological approach. Through a comprehensive methodology involving Value-Focused Thinking (VFT), fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), and multi-objective mathematical programming, the study identifies key criteria encompassing social, economic, environmental, and technological dimensions. The resulting criteria form a robust framework for evaluating project sustainability. The fuzzy DEMATEL analysis reveals intricate interrelations among criteria, emphasizing the need for balanced considerations. Results highlighted job creation, income equality, and microfinance support as key social considerations, while energy-related criteria emphasized sustainable practices. The proposed multi-objective programming model and COmbined COmpromise SOlution (COCOSO) method facilitated the selection of eight projects, with one project as the top-ranked option across various scoring strategies. Overall, this research provides a nuanced roadmap for effective decision-making in renewable energy projects, offering insights into project strengths, weaknesses, and potential areas for improvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信