评估新冠肺炎疫情后能源、金属和农产品对美国股市的对冲潜力

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
SeungOh Han
{"title":"评估新冠肺炎疫情后能源、金属和农产品对美国股市的对冲潜力","authors":"SeungOh Han","doi":"10.1016/j.najef.2025.102380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study employs TVP-VAR analysis to assess risk spillover effects between the U.S. stock ETF and commodity futures (energy, metals, grains, livestock, and soft) during the year surrounding the COVID-19 outbreak. Market connectedness intensifies rapidly after January 2020, with Brent crude oil and heating oil emerging as major net risk transmitters and Richard Bay coal as a primary receiver. While short-term interconnectedness shows sharp spikes with quick reversals, long-term interconnectedness exhibits modest but persistent elevation, necessitating horizon-specific hedging strategies. Our analysis reveals that livestock futures provide the most cost-effective hedge against the S&amp;P 500 ETF, highlighting the potential of previously overlooked instruments. Energy futures demonstrate significant risk mitigation capabilities, reinforcing their established hedging role, while soft futures show notably enhanced hedging effectiveness. These patterns remain consistent across sector ETFs, with metals futures particularly effective for energy ETF hedging. The findings prove robust to alternative specifications, including the NASDAQ 100 ETF, extended analysis periods, different pandemic period definitions, and raw returns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47831,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 102380"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the hedging potential of energy, metals, and agricultural commodities for U.S. stocks post-COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"SeungOh Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.najef.2025.102380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study employs TVP-VAR analysis to assess risk spillover effects between the U.S. stock ETF and commodity futures (energy, metals, grains, livestock, and soft) during the year surrounding the COVID-19 outbreak. Market connectedness intensifies rapidly after January 2020, with Brent crude oil and heating oil emerging as major net risk transmitters and Richard Bay coal as a primary receiver. While short-term interconnectedness shows sharp spikes with quick reversals, long-term interconnectedness exhibits modest but persistent elevation, necessitating horizon-specific hedging strategies. Our analysis reveals that livestock futures provide the most cost-effective hedge against the S&amp;P 500 ETF, highlighting the potential of previously overlooked instruments. Energy futures demonstrate significant risk mitigation capabilities, reinforcing their established hedging role, while soft futures show notably enhanced hedging effectiveness. These patterns remain consistent across sector ETFs, with metals futures particularly effective for energy ETF hedging. The findings prove robust to alternative specifications, including the NASDAQ 100 ETF, extended analysis periods, different pandemic period definitions, and raw returns.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American Journal of Economics and Finance\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American Journal of Economics and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940825000208\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940825000208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用tpv - var分析方法,评估了新冠疫情爆发前后美国股票ETF与大宗商品期货(能源、金属、谷物、牲畜和软产品)之间的风险溢出效应。2020年1月之后,市场连通性迅速增强,布伦特原油和取暖油成为主要的净风险传递者,理查德湾煤炭成为主要的接收者。虽然短期互联性表现出急剧的峰值和快速的逆转,但长期互联性表现出适度但持续的提升,因此需要针对特定水平的对冲策略。我们的分析显示,牲畜期货提供了最具成本效益的对冲标准普尔500指数ETF的工具,突出了以前被忽视的工具的潜力。能源期货显示出显著的风险缓解能力,加强了其既定的对冲作用,而软期货显示出显著增强的对冲有效性。这些模式在各个行业的ETF中保持一致,金属期货对能源ETF对冲尤其有效。研究结果对其他指标(包括纳斯达克100 ETF、延长的分析周期、不同的流行病时期定义和原始回报)证明是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the hedging potential of energy, metals, and agricultural commodities for U.S. stocks post-COVID-19
This study employs TVP-VAR analysis to assess risk spillover effects between the U.S. stock ETF and commodity futures (energy, metals, grains, livestock, and soft) during the year surrounding the COVID-19 outbreak. Market connectedness intensifies rapidly after January 2020, with Brent crude oil and heating oil emerging as major net risk transmitters and Richard Bay coal as a primary receiver. While short-term interconnectedness shows sharp spikes with quick reversals, long-term interconnectedness exhibits modest but persistent elevation, necessitating horizon-specific hedging strategies. Our analysis reveals that livestock futures provide the most cost-effective hedge against the S&P 500 ETF, highlighting the potential of previously overlooked instruments. Energy futures demonstrate significant risk mitigation capabilities, reinforcing their established hedging role, while soft futures show notably enhanced hedging effectiveness. These patterns remain consistent across sector ETFs, with metals futures particularly effective for energy ETF hedging. The findings prove robust to alternative specifications, including the NASDAQ 100 ETF, extended analysis periods, different pandemic period definitions, and raw returns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
168
期刊介绍: The focus of the North-American Journal of Economics and Finance is on the economics of integration of goods, services, financial markets, at both regional and global levels with the role of economic policy in that process playing an important role. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome. Empirical and policy-related papers that rely on data and the experiences of countries outside North America are also welcome. Papers should offer concrete lessons about the ongoing process of globalization, or policy implications about how governments, domestic or international institutions, can improve the coordination of their activities. Empirical analysis should be capable of replication. Authors of accepted papers will be encouraged to supply data and computer programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信