{"title":"评估新冠肺炎疫情后能源、金属和农产品对美国股市的对冲潜力","authors":"SeungOh Han","doi":"10.1016/j.najef.2025.102380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study employs TVP-VAR analysis to assess risk spillover effects between the U.S. stock ETF and commodity futures (energy, metals, grains, livestock, and soft) during the year surrounding the COVID-19 outbreak. Market connectedness intensifies rapidly after January 2020, with Brent crude oil and heating oil emerging as major net risk transmitters and Richard Bay coal as a primary receiver. While short-term interconnectedness shows sharp spikes with quick reversals, long-term interconnectedness exhibits modest but persistent elevation, necessitating horizon-specific hedging strategies. Our analysis reveals that livestock futures provide the most cost-effective hedge against the S&P 500 ETF, highlighting the potential of previously overlooked instruments. Energy futures demonstrate significant risk mitigation capabilities, reinforcing their established hedging role, while soft futures show notably enhanced hedging effectiveness. These patterns remain consistent across sector ETFs, with metals futures particularly effective for energy ETF hedging. The findings prove robust to alternative specifications, including the NASDAQ 100 ETF, extended analysis periods, different pandemic period definitions, and raw returns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47831,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 102380"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the hedging potential of energy, metals, and agricultural commodities for U.S. stocks post-COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"SeungOh Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.najef.2025.102380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study employs TVP-VAR analysis to assess risk spillover effects between the U.S. stock ETF and commodity futures (energy, metals, grains, livestock, and soft) during the year surrounding the COVID-19 outbreak. Market connectedness intensifies rapidly after January 2020, with Brent crude oil and heating oil emerging as major net risk transmitters and Richard Bay coal as a primary receiver. While short-term interconnectedness shows sharp spikes with quick reversals, long-term interconnectedness exhibits modest but persistent elevation, necessitating horizon-specific hedging strategies. Our analysis reveals that livestock futures provide the most cost-effective hedge against the S&P 500 ETF, highlighting the potential of previously overlooked instruments. Energy futures demonstrate significant risk mitigation capabilities, reinforcing their established hedging role, while soft futures show notably enhanced hedging effectiveness. These patterns remain consistent across sector ETFs, with metals futures particularly effective for energy ETF hedging. The findings prove robust to alternative specifications, including the NASDAQ 100 ETF, extended analysis periods, different pandemic period definitions, and raw returns.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American Journal of Economics and Finance\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American Journal of Economics and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940825000208\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940825000208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the hedging potential of energy, metals, and agricultural commodities for U.S. stocks post-COVID-19
This study employs TVP-VAR analysis to assess risk spillover effects between the U.S. stock ETF and commodity futures (energy, metals, grains, livestock, and soft) during the year surrounding the COVID-19 outbreak. Market connectedness intensifies rapidly after January 2020, with Brent crude oil and heating oil emerging as major net risk transmitters and Richard Bay coal as a primary receiver. While short-term interconnectedness shows sharp spikes with quick reversals, long-term interconnectedness exhibits modest but persistent elevation, necessitating horizon-specific hedging strategies. Our analysis reveals that livestock futures provide the most cost-effective hedge against the S&P 500 ETF, highlighting the potential of previously overlooked instruments. Energy futures demonstrate significant risk mitigation capabilities, reinforcing their established hedging role, while soft futures show notably enhanced hedging effectiveness. These patterns remain consistent across sector ETFs, with metals futures particularly effective for energy ETF hedging. The findings prove robust to alternative specifications, including the NASDAQ 100 ETF, extended analysis periods, different pandemic period definitions, and raw returns.
期刊介绍:
The focus of the North-American Journal of Economics and Finance is on the economics of integration of goods, services, financial markets, at both regional and global levels with the role of economic policy in that process playing an important role. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome. Empirical and policy-related papers that rely on data and the experiences of countries outside North America are also welcome. Papers should offer concrete lessons about the ongoing process of globalization, or policy implications about how governments, domestic or international institutions, can improve the coordination of their activities. Empirical analysis should be capable of replication. Authors of accepted papers will be encouraged to supply data and computer programs.