竞争更激烈的市场中更高的价格:英国零售电力市场的悖论

IF 5 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Huanhuan Chen , Jinke Li , Nigel O'Leary , Jing Shao
{"title":"竞争更激烈的市场中更高的价格:英国零售电力市场的悖论","authors":"Huanhuan Chen ,&nbsp;Jinke Li ,&nbsp;Nigel O'Leary ,&nbsp;Jing Shao","doi":"10.1016/j.strueco.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The UK retail electricity market experienced a decline in market concentration as new suppliers (retailers) competed with traditional incumbents. Concurrently, consumer-funded schemes were implemented to support low-carbon electricity generation. To disentangle the effects of these two developments on the retail price, an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) cointegration model was applied to monthly data from 2010 to 2019. Results indicate that, while the costs of consumer-funded schemes contributed to the rising retail price, the declining market concentration unexpectedly pushed the retail price upward. Analysis of the six large suppliers shows that incumbents struggled to lower indirect costs as sales volumes fell, passing higher indirect costs per megawatt-hour to consumers. However, due to competitive pressure from new suppliers, incumbents were constrained from raising retail prices to fully cover these higher costs, resulting in lower profit margins. Thus, competition was evident not through lower retail prices but through its effect on incumbents' profitability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47829,"journal":{"name":"Structural Change and Economic Dynamics","volume":"72 ","pages":"Pages 374-390"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher prices in a more competitive market: The paradox in the retail electricity market in the United Kingdom\",\"authors\":\"Huanhuan Chen ,&nbsp;Jinke Li ,&nbsp;Nigel O'Leary ,&nbsp;Jing Shao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.strueco.2024.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The UK retail electricity market experienced a decline in market concentration as new suppliers (retailers) competed with traditional incumbents. Concurrently, consumer-funded schemes were implemented to support low-carbon electricity generation. To disentangle the effects of these two developments on the retail price, an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) cointegration model was applied to monthly data from 2010 to 2019. Results indicate that, while the costs of consumer-funded schemes contributed to the rising retail price, the declining market concentration unexpectedly pushed the retail price upward. Analysis of the six large suppliers shows that incumbents struggled to lower indirect costs as sales volumes fell, passing higher indirect costs per megawatt-hour to consumers. However, due to competitive pressure from new suppliers, incumbents were constrained from raising retail prices to fully cover these higher costs, resulting in lower profit margins. Thus, competition was evident not through lower retail prices but through its effect on incumbents' profitability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structural Change and Economic Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 374-390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structural Change and Economic Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954349X24001772\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Change and Economic Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954349X24001772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国零售电力市场经历了市场集中度的下降,因为新的供应商(零售商)与传统的在位者竞争。同时,实施了消费者资助计划,以支持低碳发电。为了解开这两种发展对零售价格的影响,我们将自回归分布滞后(ARDL)协整模型应用于2010年至2019年的月度数据。结果表明,虽然消费者资助计划的成本导致零售价格上涨,但市场集中度的下降意外地推动了零售价格的上涨。对六家大型供应商的分析显示,随着销量下降,现有企业难以降低间接成本,将每兆瓦时更高的间接成本转嫁给消费者。然而,由于来自新供应商的竞争压力,现有企业无法通过提高零售价格来完全弥补这些更高的成本,从而导致利润率下降。因此,竞争不是通过降低零售价格,而是通过其对现有企业盈利能力的影响来体现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Higher prices in a more competitive market: The paradox in the retail electricity market in the United Kingdom
The UK retail electricity market experienced a decline in market concentration as new suppliers (retailers) competed with traditional incumbents. Concurrently, consumer-funded schemes were implemented to support low-carbon electricity generation. To disentangle the effects of these two developments on the retail price, an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) cointegration model was applied to monthly data from 2010 to 2019. Results indicate that, while the costs of consumer-funded schemes contributed to the rising retail price, the declining market concentration unexpectedly pushed the retail price upward. Analysis of the six large suppliers shows that incumbents struggled to lower indirect costs as sales volumes fell, passing higher indirect costs per megawatt-hour to consumers. However, due to competitive pressure from new suppliers, incumbents were constrained from raising retail prices to fully cover these higher costs, resulting in lower profit margins. Thus, competition was evident not through lower retail prices but through its effect on incumbents' profitability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Structural Change and Economic Dynamics publishes articles about theoretical, applied and methodological aspects of structural change in economic systems. The journal publishes work analysing dynamics and structural breaks in economic, technological, behavioural and institutional patterns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信