使用和参与?通过基于智能手机的干预识别不同的用户类型

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Aniek M. Siezenga , Esther C.A. Mertens , Jean-Louis van Gelder
{"title":"使用和参与?通过基于智能手机的干预识别不同的用户类型","authors":"Aniek M. Siezenga ,&nbsp;Esther C.A. Mertens ,&nbsp;Jean-Louis van Gelder","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Smartphone users are a heterogeneous group, implying that certain user types might be distinguishable by the way they interact with a smartphone-based intervention. As these user types potentially benefit differently from an intervention, there is a need to identify them to inform future research, intervention design, and, eventually, improve intervention effectiveness. To this end, we explored 1) whether user types were distinguishable in terms of how much they used a smartphone-based intervention and experienced app engagement; and whether user types differed in 2) their intervention effects; and 3) user characteristics, i.e., HEXACO personality traits and self-efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Participants were Dutch first-year university students that interacted with the FutureU app aimed at increasing future self-identification. App usage data and engagement survey data were obtained in a randomized controlled trial taking place in 2022 (<em>n</em> = 86). <em>K</em>-means++ cluster analyses were applied to identify user types based on app use and engagement. Linear discriminant analyses, ANCOVAs, and MANOVAs were conducted to assess whether the clusters differed in intervention outcomes and individual characteristics. The analyses were replicated in data obtained in an RCT taking place in 2023 with an updated version of the app (<em>n</em> = 106).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four user types were identified: Low use–Low engagement, Low use–High engagement, High use–Low engagement, High use–High engagement. Overall, intervention effects were strongest for the user types High engagement–High use and High engagement–Low use. No significant differences were observed in user characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>User types can vary in their use of and engagement with smartphone-based interventions, and benefit differently from these interventions. App engagement appears to play a more significant role than previously assumed, highlighting a need for further studies on drivers of app engagement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100602"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To use and engage? Identifying distinct user types in interaction with a smartphone-based intervention\",\"authors\":\"Aniek M. Siezenga ,&nbsp;Esther C.A. Mertens ,&nbsp;Jean-Louis van Gelder\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Smartphone users are a heterogeneous group, implying that certain user types might be distinguishable by the way they interact with a smartphone-based intervention. As these user types potentially benefit differently from an intervention, there is a need to identify them to inform future research, intervention design, and, eventually, improve intervention effectiveness. To this end, we explored 1) whether user types were distinguishable in terms of how much they used a smartphone-based intervention and experienced app engagement; and whether user types differed in 2) their intervention effects; and 3) user characteristics, i.e., HEXACO personality traits and self-efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Participants were Dutch first-year university students that interacted with the FutureU app aimed at increasing future self-identification. App usage data and engagement survey data were obtained in a randomized controlled trial taking place in 2022 (<em>n</em> = 86). <em>K</em>-means++ cluster analyses were applied to identify user types based on app use and engagement. Linear discriminant analyses, ANCOVAs, and MANOVAs were conducted to assess whether the clusters differed in intervention outcomes and individual characteristics. The analyses were replicated in data obtained in an RCT taking place in 2023 with an updated version of the app (<em>n</em> = 106).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four user types were identified: Low use–Low engagement, Low use–High engagement, High use–Low engagement, High use–High engagement. Overall, intervention effects were strongest for the user types High engagement–High use and High engagement–Low use. No significant differences were observed in user characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>User types can vary in their use of and engagement with smartphone-based interventions, and benefit differently from these interventions. App engagement appears to play a more significant role than previously assumed, highlighting a need for further studies on drivers of app engagement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245195882500017X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245195882500017X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

智能手机用户是一个异质群体,这意味着某些用户类型可以通过他们与基于智能手机的干预的交互方式来区分。由于这些用户类型可能从干预中获益不同,因此有必要识别它们,以便为未来的研究、干预设计提供信息,并最终提高干预效果。为此,我们探讨了1)用户类型是否可以根据他们使用基于智能手机的干预和体验应用粘性的程度来区分;用户类型是否存在2)干预效果的差异;3)用户特征,即HEXACO人格特征和自我效能感。参与者是荷兰的一年级大学生,他们与FutureU应用程序进行互动,旨在提高未来的自我认同。App使用数据和用户粘性调查数据是在2022年进行的一项随机对照试验中获得的(n = 86)。应用k -means++聚类分析来识别基于应用使用和参与的用户类型。采用线性判别分析、ANCOVAs和manova来评估这些聚类在干预结果和个体特征上是否存在差异。这些分析在2023年使用更新版本的应用程序(n = 106)进行的随机对照试验中获得的数据中得到了重复。结果确定了四种用户类型:低使用率-低参与度,低使用率-高参与度,高使用率-低参与度,高使用率-高参与度。总体而言,高参与-高使用和高参与-低使用的用户类型的干预效果最强。在用户特征上没有观察到显著差异。结论用户类型在使用和参与基于智能手机的干预措施方面可能有所不同,并且从这些干预措施中获益不同。应用粘性所扮演的角色似乎比之前所认为的更为重要,这凸显了对应用粘性驱动因素进行进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To use and engage? Identifying distinct user types in interaction with a smartphone-based intervention

Background

Smartphone users are a heterogeneous group, implying that certain user types might be distinguishable by the way they interact with a smartphone-based intervention. As these user types potentially benefit differently from an intervention, there is a need to identify them to inform future research, intervention design, and, eventually, improve intervention effectiveness. To this end, we explored 1) whether user types were distinguishable in terms of how much they used a smartphone-based intervention and experienced app engagement; and whether user types differed in 2) their intervention effects; and 3) user characteristics, i.e., HEXACO personality traits and self-efficacy.

Method

Participants were Dutch first-year university students that interacted with the FutureU app aimed at increasing future self-identification. App usage data and engagement survey data were obtained in a randomized controlled trial taking place in 2022 (n = 86). K-means++ cluster analyses were applied to identify user types based on app use and engagement. Linear discriminant analyses, ANCOVAs, and MANOVAs were conducted to assess whether the clusters differed in intervention outcomes and individual characteristics. The analyses were replicated in data obtained in an RCT taking place in 2023 with an updated version of the app (n = 106).

Results

Four user types were identified: Low use–Low engagement, Low use–High engagement, High use–Low engagement, High use–High engagement. Overall, intervention effects were strongest for the user types High engagement–High use and High engagement–Low use. No significant differences were observed in user characteristics.

Conclusion

User types can vary in their use of and engagement with smartphone-based interventions, and benefit differently from these interventions. App engagement appears to play a more significant role than previously assumed, highlighting a need for further studies on drivers of app engagement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信