为什么绿色补贴比碳税更受青睐:提高碳税重要性的气候政策

IF 5.5 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS
Frederick van der Ploeg
{"title":"为什么绿色补贴比碳税更受青睐:提高碳税重要性的气候政策","authors":"Frederick van der Ploeg","doi":"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Policy makers must take account of the fact that carbon taxes are highly unpopular. Once policy makers take this into account, they should adopt a modified targeting principle by setting the optimal carbon tax below the Pigouvian tax (i.e., the social cost of carbon) and excessively subsidising products that are made with renewable energy. We numerically illustrate these behavioural biases in climate policies in the face of heightened carbon tax salience and note that this helps to explain distortions in current climate policies. We find that governments might then even take the easy option of green spending and fossil fuel subsidies rather than taxing carbon emissions. This is costly as welfare is lower than it would be without behavioural misperceptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 103129"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why green subsidies are preferred to carbon taxes: Climate policy with heightened carbon tax salience\",\"authors\":\"Frederick van der Ploeg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeem.2025.103129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Policy makers must take account of the fact that carbon taxes are highly unpopular. Once policy makers take this into account, they should adopt a modified targeting principle by setting the optimal carbon tax below the Pigouvian tax (i.e., the social cost of carbon) and excessively subsidising products that are made with renewable energy. We numerically illustrate these behavioural biases in climate policies in the face of heightened carbon tax salience and note that this helps to explain distortions in current climate policies. We find that governments might then even take the easy option of green spending and fossil fuel subsidies rather than taxing carbon emissions. This is costly as welfare is lower than it would be without behavioural misperceptions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management\",\"volume\":\"130 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069625000130\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069625000130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政策制定者必须考虑到碳税非常不受欢迎的事实。一旦政策制定者考虑到这一点,他们就应该采用修改后的目标原则,将最优碳税设定在庇古税(即碳的社会成本)以下,并过度补贴使用可再生能源生产的产品。我们用数字说明了在碳税显著提高的情况下,气候政策中的这些行为偏差,并指出这有助于解释当前气候政策中的扭曲。我们发现,政府甚至可能会选择绿色支出和化石燃料补贴,而不是对碳排放征税。这是代价高昂的,因为如果没有行为上的误解,福利就会降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why green subsidies are preferred to carbon taxes: Climate policy with heightened carbon tax salience
Policy makers must take account of the fact that carbon taxes are highly unpopular. Once policy makers take this into account, they should adopt a modified targeting principle by setting the optimal carbon tax below the Pigouvian tax (i.e., the social cost of carbon) and excessively subsidising products that are made with renewable energy. We numerically illustrate these behavioural biases in climate policies in the face of heightened carbon tax salience and note that this helps to explain distortions in current climate policies. We find that governments might then even take the easy option of green spending and fossil fuel subsidies rather than taxing carbon emissions. This is costly as welfare is lower than it would be without behavioural misperceptions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Economics and Management publishes theoretical and empirical papers devoted to specific natural resources and environmental issues. For consideration, papers should (1) contain a substantial element embodying the linkage between economic systems and environmental and natural resources systems or (2) be of substantial importance in understanding the management and/or social control of the economy in its relations with the natural environment. Although the general orientation of the journal is toward economics, interdisciplinary papers by researchers in other fields of interest to resource and environmental economists will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信