{"title":"卵巢应答不良者体外受精后围产期和新生儿结局:一项前瞻性单中心观察研究","authors":"Cuiping Hu, Tianxiang Ni, Zhangwei Jia, Jianye Deng, Jing Li, Qian Zhang, Mingdi Xia, Juanjuan Lu, Junhao Yan","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the risk of adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes between individuals with poor ovarian response (POR) and those with normal ovarian response (NOR) following in vitro fertilisation (IVF).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective single-centre observational study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>University hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 1663 patients who underwent embryo transfer cycles between June 2017 and August 2019 were evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The patients were divided into the POR and NOR groups based on the Bologna diagnostic criteria. The risk of perinatal and neonatal complications was then compared between groups with adjustment made for confounding factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>The risk of perinatal and neonatal complications between the POR and NOR groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compared with the NOR group, the POR group had poor pregnancy outcomes but comparable overall risks of poor perinatal and neonatal outcomes. The overall incidence rate of complications was 25.42% and 25.30% in the POR and NOR groups respectively [risk ratio (RR): 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63–1.59]. In subgroup analysis of singleton live births, the overall risk of total complications was higher in the POR group than in the NOR group (24.07% vs. 15.21%; RR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.04–3.00); however, the risks became comparable between them after logistic regression adjustment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The overall risk of perinatal and neonatal complications among singleton live births was higher in patients with POR than in those with NOR; however, the risks became similar after logistic regression adjustment. Our findings provide overall comforting evidence for POR patients with IVF treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 S2","pages":"36-43"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes Following In Vitro Fertilisation in Poor Ovarian Responders: A Prospective Single-Centre Observational Study\",\"authors\":\"Cuiping Hu, Tianxiang Ni, Zhangwei Jia, Jianye Deng, Jing Li, Qian Zhang, Mingdi Xia, Juanjuan Lu, Junhao Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.18046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To compare the risk of adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes between individuals with poor ovarian response (POR) and those with normal ovarian response (NOR) following in vitro fertilisation (IVF).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A prospective single-centre observational study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>University hospital.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Population</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, 1663 patients who underwent embryo transfer cycles between June 2017 and August 2019 were evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The patients were divided into the POR and NOR groups based on the Bologna diagnostic criteria. The risk of perinatal and neonatal complications was then compared between groups with adjustment made for confounding factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>The risk of perinatal and neonatal complications between the POR and NOR groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Compared with the NOR group, the POR group had poor pregnancy outcomes but comparable overall risks of poor perinatal and neonatal outcomes. The overall incidence rate of complications was 25.42% and 25.30% in the POR and NOR groups respectively [risk ratio (RR): 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63–1.59]. In subgroup analysis of singleton live births, the overall risk of total complications was higher in the POR group than in the NOR group (24.07% vs. 15.21%; RR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.04–3.00); however, the risks became comparable between them after logistic regression adjustment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The overall risk of perinatal and neonatal complications among singleton live births was higher in patients with POR than in those with NOR; however, the risks became similar after logistic regression adjustment. Our findings provide overall comforting evidence for POR patients with IVF treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"132 S2\",\"pages\":\"36-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18046\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes Following In Vitro Fertilisation in Poor Ovarian Responders: A Prospective Single-Centre Observational Study
Objective
To compare the risk of adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes between individuals with poor ovarian response (POR) and those with normal ovarian response (NOR) following in vitro fertilisation (IVF).
Design
A prospective single-centre observational study.
Setting
University hospital.
Population
Overall, 1663 patients who underwent embryo transfer cycles between June 2017 and August 2019 were evaluated.
Methods
The patients were divided into the POR and NOR groups based on the Bologna diagnostic criteria. The risk of perinatal and neonatal complications was then compared between groups with adjustment made for confounding factors.
Main Outcome Measures
The risk of perinatal and neonatal complications between the POR and NOR groups.
Results
Compared with the NOR group, the POR group had poor pregnancy outcomes but comparable overall risks of poor perinatal and neonatal outcomes. The overall incidence rate of complications was 25.42% and 25.30% in the POR and NOR groups respectively [risk ratio (RR): 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63–1.59]. In subgroup analysis of singleton live births, the overall risk of total complications was higher in the POR group than in the NOR group (24.07% vs. 15.21%; RR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.04–3.00); however, the risks became comparable between them after logistic regression adjustment.
Conclusions
The overall risk of perinatal and neonatal complications among singleton live births was higher in patients with POR than in those with NOR; however, the risks became similar after logistic regression adjustment. Our findings provide overall comforting evidence for POR patients with IVF treatment.
期刊介绍:
BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.