生态创新、公司治理和国家层面的制度:一个跨国家的证据

IF 13.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Arup Roy, Ranjan DasGupta
{"title":"生态创新、公司治理和国家层面的制度:一个跨国家的证据","authors":"Arup Roy,&nbsp;Ranjan DasGupta","doi":"10.1002/bse.4163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>There is a dearth of empirical research to examine how a firm's internal corporate governance mechanisms would impact eco-innovation practices under distinctive nation-level institutions. Therefore, we conducted this study to examine the individual roles of board size, board diversity (i.e., female directors' presence) and board independence in motivating a firm's eco-innovation practices in an extended cross-country setting. Furthermore, we examine whether nation-level institutions moderate our primary study associations. By employing the system generalized method of moment (SGMM) method for panel data of 19 countries from 2010 to 2021, we find a positive impact of board diversity and independence, whereas board size has a significant negative influence on a firm's eco-innovation practices. However, the political and cultural systems moderate negatively, whereas the education and labour systems and financial systems strengthen our primary findings. The results remain strong even after using additional measurements for dependent variables, addressing endogeneity concerns and using multiple estimating methods to account for bias from omitted variables. Regulators and policymakers can use these findings to formulate stringent institutional policies in regard to nation-level eco-innovation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"34 3","pages":"3865-3891"},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eco-Innovation, Corporate Governance and Nation-Level Institutions: A Cross-Country Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Arup Roy,&nbsp;Ranjan DasGupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bse.4163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>There is a dearth of empirical research to examine how a firm's internal corporate governance mechanisms would impact eco-innovation practices under distinctive nation-level institutions. Therefore, we conducted this study to examine the individual roles of board size, board diversity (i.e., female directors' presence) and board independence in motivating a firm's eco-innovation practices in an extended cross-country setting. Furthermore, we examine whether nation-level institutions moderate our primary study associations. By employing the system generalized method of moment (SGMM) method for panel data of 19 countries from 2010 to 2021, we find a positive impact of board diversity and independence, whereas board size has a significant negative influence on a firm's eco-innovation practices. However, the political and cultural systems moderate negatively, whereas the education and labour systems and financial systems strengthen our primary findings. The results remain strong even after using additional measurements for dependent variables, addressing endogeneity concerns and using multiple estimating methods to account for bias from omitted variables. Regulators and policymakers can use these findings to formulate stringent institutional policies in regard to nation-level eco-innovation.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"3865-3891\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.4163\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.4163","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在不同的国家制度下,企业内部公司治理机制对生态创新实践的影响尚缺乏实证研究。因此,我们进行了这项研究,以检验董事会规模、董事会多样性(即女性董事的存在)和董事会独立性在激励跨国公司生态创新实践中的个体作用。此外,我们研究了国家级机构是否调节了我们的主要研究关联。通过对2010年至2021年19个国家的面板数据采用系统广义矩量法(SGMM),我们发现董事会多样性和独立性对公司的生态创新实践有积极影响,而董事会规模对公司的生态创新实践有显著的负面影响。然而,政治和文化制度缓和了负面影响,而教育和劳工制度以及金融制度加强了我们的初步发现。即使对因变量进行了额外的测量,解决了内生性问题,并使用多种估计方法来解释遗漏变量的偏差,结果仍然很强。监管机构和政策制定者可以利用这些发现来制定关于国家层面生态创新的严格制度政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eco-Innovation, Corporate Governance and Nation-Level Institutions: A Cross-Country Evidence

There is a dearth of empirical research to examine how a firm's internal corporate governance mechanisms would impact eco-innovation practices under distinctive nation-level institutions. Therefore, we conducted this study to examine the individual roles of board size, board diversity (i.e., female directors' presence) and board independence in motivating a firm's eco-innovation practices in an extended cross-country setting. Furthermore, we examine whether nation-level institutions moderate our primary study associations. By employing the system generalized method of moment (SGMM) method for panel data of 19 countries from 2010 to 2021, we find a positive impact of board diversity and independence, whereas board size has a significant negative influence on a firm's eco-innovation practices. However, the political and cultural systems moderate negatively, whereas the education and labour systems and financial systems strengthen our primary findings. The results remain strong even after using additional measurements for dependent variables, addressing endogeneity concerns and using multiple estimating methods to account for bias from omitted variables. Regulators and policymakers can use these findings to formulate stringent institutional policies in regard to nation-level eco-innovation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信