成人医学难治性癫痫患者的MRI解释错误。

Aoife M Haughey, Nadav Gasner, Timo Krings
{"title":"成人医学难治性癫痫患者的MRI解释错误。","authors":"Aoife M Haughey, Nadav Gasner, Timo Krings","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The aim is to determine the most common MRI interpretation errors in patients with medically refractory epilepsy (MRE) according to our experience in a tertiary academic center with a large volume epilepsy program, to raise awareness of the \"blind spots\" in imaging patients with MRE, and to highlight the importance of combining clinical and electroencephalographic information to obtain the most accurate diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective observational study. All patients with MRE who underwent MRI brain (on 3T, with dedicated epilepsy protocol), and who were discussed at the weekly interdisciplinary epilepsy conference in our center between January 2008 and July 2023 were included. The initial MRI interpretation and final MRI interpretation results were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 886 patients with MRE were included. Three hundred patients were MRI-negative (33.86%), diagnoses were missed in 95 patients (10.7%), a second diagnosis was missed in patients with dual pathologies in 42 patients (4.74%), findings were misinterpreted in 4 patients (0.45%), an overcall was made in 2 patients (0.2%), and in 5 patients the correct diagnosis was discussed but erroneously deemed absent on initial interpretation (0.56%), resulting in a total of 148 discrepant MRI reports. Mesial temporal sclerosis comprised the most common pathology encountered overall, followed by encephalomalacia related to prior insult, enlarged amygdala (EA), malformations of cortical development, cavernoma, and ulegyria. The relative proportion of missed focal cortical dysplasia, encephalocele, and EA accounted for the most common misses/misdiagnoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluation of patients with MRE requires excellent interdisciplinary care. Input from all members of the interdisciplinary team is essential for accurate interpretation of MRI in patients with MRE for the neuroradiologist. We hope to inform radiologists of commonly overlooked pathologies in MRI brain interpretation for patients with epilepsy. In doing so, we want to maximize the yield of initial MRI interpretation in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"1501-1509"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRI Interpretation Errors in Adult Patients with Medically Refractory Epilepsy.\",\"authors\":\"Aoife M Haughey, Nadav Gasner, Timo Krings\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A8681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The aim is to determine the most common MRI interpretation errors in patients with medically refractory epilepsy (MRE) according to our experience in a tertiary academic center with a large volume epilepsy program, to raise awareness of the \\\"blind spots\\\" in imaging patients with MRE, and to highlight the importance of combining clinical and electroencephalographic information to obtain the most accurate diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective observational study. All patients with MRE who underwent MRI brain (on 3T, with dedicated epilepsy protocol), and who were discussed at the weekly interdisciplinary epilepsy conference in our center between January 2008 and July 2023 were included. The initial MRI interpretation and final MRI interpretation results were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 886 patients with MRE were included. Three hundred patients were MRI-negative (33.86%), diagnoses were missed in 95 patients (10.7%), a second diagnosis was missed in patients with dual pathologies in 42 patients (4.74%), findings were misinterpreted in 4 patients (0.45%), an overcall was made in 2 patients (0.2%), and in 5 patients the correct diagnosis was discussed but erroneously deemed absent on initial interpretation (0.56%), resulting in a total of 148 discrepant MRI reports. Mesial temporal sclerosis comprised the most common pathology encountered overall, followed by encephalomalacia related to prior insult, enlarged amygdala (EA), malformations of cortical development, cavernoma, and ulegyria. The relative proportion of missed focal cortical dysplasia, encephalocele, and EA accounted for the most common misses/misdiagnoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluation of patients with MRE requires excellent interdisciplinary care. Input from all members of the interdisciplinary team is essential for accurate interpretation of MRI in patients with MRE for the neuroradiologist. We hope to inform radiologists of commonly overlooked pathologies in MRI brain interpretation for patients with epilepsy. In doing so, we want to maximize the yield of initial MRI interpretation in these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1501-1509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:根据我们在一家拥有大容量癫痫项目的三级学术中心的经验,确定MRE患者最常见的MRI解释错误,以提高对MRE患者成像“盲点”的认识,并强调将临床和脑电图信息相结合以获得最准确诊断的重要性。材料与方法:本研究为回顾性观察性研究。所有在2008年1月至2023年7月期间在本中心每周癫痫跨学科会议上接受脑MRI(3特斯拉,专用癫痫方案)并进行讨论的mre患者均被纳入。回顾了最初的MRI解释和最终的MRI解释结果。结果:共纳入886例MRE患者。MRI阴性300例(33.86%),漏诊95例(10.7%),双重病理漏诊42例(4.74%),误诊4例(0.45%),复诊2例(0.2%),讨论正确诊断但误以为初次解释不全5例(0.56%),共148例MRI不一致报告。总的来说,MTS是最常见的病理,其次是与先前损伤相关的脑软化症、杏仁核肿大、皮质发育畸形、海绵状瘤和尿漏。局灶性皮质发育不良、脑膨出和杏仁核增大是最常见的漏诊/误诊。结论:对MRE患者的评估需要良好的跨学科护理。跨学科团队的所有成员的输入对于神经放射科医生准确解释MRE患者的MRI至关重要。我们希望告知放射科医生在癫痫患者的MRI脑部解释中经常被忽视的病理。在这样做时,我们希望在这些患者中最大化初始MRI解释的产量。缩写:EA,扁桃体增大;脑电图,脑电图;EMR、电子病历、FCD、局灶性皮质发育不良;皮质发育畸形;梅格,脑磁图描记术;MRE,医学上难治性癫痫;MTS,内侧颞叶硬化;TLE,颞叶癫痫;正电子发射断层扫描(PET),与MRI (SISCOM)共登记的减相断层扫描(SPECT),皮质下结节性异位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MRI Interpretation Errors in Adult Patients with Medically Refractory Epilepsy.

Background and purpose: The aim is to determine the most common MRI interpretation errors in patients with medically refractory epilepsy (MRE) according to our experience in a tertiary academic center with a large volume epilepsy program, to raise awareness of the "blind spots" in imaging patients with MRE, and to highlight the importance of combining clinical and electroencephalographic information to obtain the most accurate diagnosis.

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective observational study. All patients with MRE who underwent MRI brain (on 3T, with dedicated epilepsy protocol), and who were discussed at the weekly interdisciplinary epilepsy conference in our center between January 2008 and July 2023 were included. The initial MRI interpretation and final MRI interpretation results were reviewed.

Results: A total of 886 patients with MRE were included. Three hundred patients were MRI-negative (33.86%), diagnoses were missed in 95 patients (10.7%), a second diagnosis was missed in patients with dual pathologies in 42 patients (4.74%), findings were misinterpreted in 4 patients (0.45%), an overcall was made in 2 patients (0.2%), and in 5 patients the correct diagnosis was discussed but erroneously deemed absent on initial interpretation (0.56%), resulting in a total of 148 discrepant MRI reports. Mesial temporal sclerosis comprised the most common pathology encountered overall, followed by encephalomalacia related to prior insult, enlarged amygdala (EA), malformations of cortical development, cavernoma, and ulegyria. The relative proportion of missed focal cortical dysplasia, encephalocele, and EA accounted for the most common misses/misdiagnoses.

Conclusions: Evaluation of patients with MRE requires excellent interdisciplinary care. Input from all members of the interdisciplinary team is essential for accurate interpretation of MRI in patients with MRE for the neuroradiologist. We hope to inform radiologists of commonly overlooked pathologies in MRI brain interpretation for patients with epilepsy. In doing so, we want to maximize the yield of initial MRI interpretation in these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信