经皮经椎弓根椎弓腔内固定术加短节段固定治疗晚期k mmell病:与椎体成形术加短节段固定比较的初步研究。

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-14 DOI:10.4055/cios24276
Sung Cheol Park, Gene Cheh, Yongjung Kim, Hoon-Jae Chung, Min-Seok Kang, Ji-Hye Choi
{"title":"经皮经椎弓根椎弓腔内固定术加短节段固定治疗晚期k<s:1> mmell病:与椎体成形术加短节段固定比较的初步研究。","authors":"Sung Cheol Park, Gene Cheh, Yongjung Kim, Hoon-Jae Chung, Min-Seok Kang, Ji-Hye Choi","doi":"10.4055/cios24276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of Kümmell disease (KD) is controversial. Corpectomy and reconstruction or osteotomy with long-level fusion was traditionally performed for the advanced KD. However, these procedures can be disadvantageous for elderly patients. Several alternative surgical procedures including transpedicular intravertebral cage augmentation (TPICA) or vertebroplasty (VP) combined with short-segment fixation (SSF) have been suggested to minimize the surgical burden. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of percutaneous TPICA plus SSF with VP plus SSF for advanced thoracolumbar (T11-L2) KD and to introduce our novel percutaneous TPICA technique using specially designed cannulated cage trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We devised specially designed cannulated cage trials to make the TPICA procedure safer and more reproducible, minimizing the risk of the pedicle medial wall violation. All consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous TPICA or VP combined with SSF for advanced thoracolumbar KD, from January 2021 to June 2022, with ≥ 1-year follow-up at a single institution, were included. Perioperative details, clinical outcomes (visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index), and radiological outcomes (anterior vertebral body compression percentage and vertebral kyphotic angle [VKA] of the fractured vertebra, and local Cobb angle [LCA]) were collected and compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 patients were enrolled, with 21 patients in each group. There were no patients with pedicle medial wall fracture in the TPICA group. Both procedures provided significantly favorable radiological outcomes compared to those preoperatively. No significant differences were observed in the changes over time in all radiological parameters between the groups. Loss of correction during the follow-up period was significantly smaller in patients with TPICA than in those with VP in VKA (median [interquartile range], 2.15 [0.30-2.80] vs. 2.90 [0.90-6.53]; <i>p</i> = 0.030) and LCA (2.70 ± 2.90 vs. 5.17 ± 4.40, <i>p</i> = 0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both procedures are minimally invasive and useful options for advanced KD, especially for elderly patients with high comorbidity. Our novel percutaneous TPICA technique using cannulated cage trials, being safer and more reproducible, may allow spine surgeons to easily perform TPICA.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791496/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous Transpedicular Intravertebral Cage Augmentation with Short-Segment Fixation Using Specially Designed Cannulated Cage Trials for Advanced Kümmell Disease: A Preliminary Study Comparing with Vertebroplasty with Short-Segment Fixation.\",\"authors\":\"Sung Cheol Park, Gene Cheh, Yongjung Kim, Hoon-Jae Chung, Min-Seok Kang, Ji-Hye Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.4055/cios24276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of Kümmell disease (KD) is controversial. Corpectomy and reconstruction or osteotomy with long-level fusion was traditionally performed for the advanced KD. However, these procedures can be disadvantageous for elderly patients. Several alternative surgical procedures including transpedicular intravertebral cage augmentation (TPICA) or vertebroplasty (VP) combined with short-segment fixation (SSF) have been suggested to minimize the surgical burden. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of percutaneous TPICA plus SSF with VP plus SSF for advanced thoracolumbar (T11-L2) KD and to introduce our novel percutaneous TPICA technique using specially designed cannulated cage trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We devised specially designed cannulated cage trials to make the TPICA procedure safer and more reproducible, minimizing the risk of the pedicle medial wall violation. All consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous TPICA or VP combined with SSF for advanced thoracolumbar KD, from January 2021 to June 2022, with ≥ 1-year follow-up at a single institution, were included. Perioperative details, clinical outcomes (visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index), and radiological outcomes (anterior vertebral body compression percentage and vertebral kyphotic angle [VKA] of the fractured vertebra, and local Cobb angle [LCA]) were collected and compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 patients were enrolled, with 21 patients in each group. There were no patients with pedicle medial wall fracture in the TPICA group. Both procedures provided significantly favorable radiological outcomes compared to those preoperatively. No significant differences were observed in the changes over time in all radiological parameters between the groups. Loss of correction during the follow-up period was significantly smaller in patients with TPICA than in those with VP in VKA (median [interquartile range], 2.15 [0.30-2.80] vs. 2.90 [0.90-6.53]; <i>p</i> = 0.030) and LCA (2.70 ± 2.90 vs. 5.17 ± 4.40, <i>p</i> = 0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both procedures are minimally invasive and useful options for advanced KD, especially for elderly patients with high comorbidity. Our novel percutaneous TPICA technique using cannulated cage trials, being safer and more reproducible, may allow spine surgeons to easily perform TPICA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"29-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791496/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24276\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:k mmell病(KD)的治疗存在争议。对于晚期KD,传统上采用椎体切除术和重建或截骨合并长节段融合。然而,这些手术对老年患者不利。一些替代的外科手术包括经椎弓根椎内笼增强术(TPICA)或椎体成形术(VP)联合短节段固定(SSF),以减少手术负担。本研究旨在比较经皮TPICA + SSF与VP + SSF治疗晚期胸腰椎(T11-L2) KD的效果,并通过专门设计的空心笼试验介绍我们的新型经皮TPICA技术。方法:我们设计了专门设计的空心笼试验,使TPICA手术更安全,更具可重复性,最大限度地降低了椎弓根内侧壁损伤的风险。从2021年1月至2022年6月,所有连续接受经皮TPICA或VP联合SSF治疗晚期胸腰椎KD的患者,在单一机构随访≥1年。收集两组围手术期细节、临床结果(视觉模拟评分和Oswestry残疾指数)、影像学结果(骨折椎体前椎体压缩率、椎体后凸角[VKA]、局部Cobb角[LCA])进行比较。结果:共纳入42例患者,每组21例。TPICA组无椎弓根内侧壁骨折。与术前相比,这两种方法都提供了明显有利的放射学结果。各组间所有放射学参数随时间的变化无显著差异。TPICA患者在随访期间的矫正损失明显小于VKA患者的VP(中位数[四分位数范围],2.15 [0.30-2.80]vs. 2.90 [0.90-6.53];p = 0.030)和LCA(2.70±2.90比5.17±4.40,p = 0.037)。结论:这两种手术都是微创的,对于晚期KD患者是有用的选择,特别是对于有高合并症的老年患者。我们的新型经皮TPICA技术使用空心笼试验,更安全,更可重复性,可以让脊柱外科医生更容易地进行TPICA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percutaneous Transpedicular Intravertebral Cage Augmentation with Short-Segment Fixation Using Specially Designed Cannulated Cage Trials for Advanced Kümmell Disease: A Preliminary Study Comparing with Vertebroplasty with Short-Segment Fixation.

Background: The treatment of Kümmell disease (KD) is controversial. Corpectomy and reconstruction or osteotomy with long-level fusion was traditionally performed for the advanced KD. However, these procedures can be disadvantageous for elderly patients. Several alternative surgical procedures including transpedicular intravertebral cage augmentation (TPICA) or vertebroplasty (VP) combined with short-segment fixation (SSF) have been suggested to minimize the surgical burden. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of percutaneous TPICA plus SSF with VP plus SSF for advanced thoracolumbar (T11-L2) KD and to introduce our novel percutaneous TPICA technique using specially designed cannulated cage trials.

Methods: We devised specially designed cannulated cage trials to make the TPICA procedure safer and more reproducible, minimizing the risk of the pedicle medial wall violation. All consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous TPICA or VP combined with SSF for advanced thoracolumbar KD, from January 2021 to June 2022, with ≥ 1-year follow-up at a single institution, were included. Perioperative details, clinical outcomes (visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index), and radiological outcomes (anterior vertebral body compression percentage and vertebral kyphotic angle [VKA] of the fractured vertebra, and local Cobb angle [LCA]) were collected and compared between the groups.

Results: A total of 42 patients were enrolled, with 21 patients in each group. There were no patients with pedicle medial wall fracture in the TPICA group. Both procedures provided significantly favorable radiological outcomes compared to those preoperatively. No significant differences were observed in the changes over time in all radiological parameters between the groups. Loss of correction during the follow-up period was significantly smaller in patients with TPICA than in those with VP in VKA (median [interquartile range], 2.15 [0.30-2.80] vs. 2.90 [0.90-6.53]; p = 0.030) and LCA (2.70 ± 2.90 vs. 5.17 ± 4.40, p = 0.037).

Conclusions: Both procedures are minimally invasive and useful options for advanced KD, especially for elderly patients with high comorbidity. Our novel percutaneous TPICA technique using cannulated cage trials, being safer and more reproducible, may allow spine surgeons to easily perform TPICA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信