无骨水泥柄初始固定股骨的偏移量和长度的力学影响。

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.4055/cios24051
Yutaro Shibuta, Nobuhiro Kaku, Kensei Tanaka, Tsuguaki Hosoyama
{"title":"无骨水泥柄初始固定股骨的偏移量和长度的力学影响。","authors":"Yutaro Shibuta, Nobuhiro Kaku, Kensei Tanaka, Tsuguaki Hosoyama","doi":"10.4055/cios24051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgroud: </strong>Implants with different neck offsets for hip replacement surgery are now available from various implant manufacturers and have become a widely used option for achieving postoperative hip stability. This study aimed to compare the impact of neck offset on initial stem fixation and the mechanical effects of different stem lengths when using cementless stems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a finite element analysis using Mechanical Finder ver. 12.0. CAD models of the Profemur Preserve and Profemur TL cementless stems. Each stem was appropriately sized, and the von Mises stress was calculated. We defined micromotion as the relative displacement between the stem node and the surface of bone contact. The maximum micromotion values of these finite element models were compared under standing conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stress per zone for both stems (Preserve and TL) was the highest in zone 5, followed by zones 3 and 4, which were almost in line with each other. The high offset (HIGH) stress was higher than the standard offset (STD) stress in each stem and zone. The micromotion of each stem was higher at each load in the following order: Preserve HIGH, Preserve STD, TL HIGH, and TL STD, with HIGH being higher than STD at each stem.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The choice of higher offset or shorter length stems induced higher micromotion at the interface to the bone in the early postoperative period. Therefore, surgeons should be more careful to get appropriate initial fixation using shorter stems with higher offset necks due to the relatively high incidence of loosening or fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":"46-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical Effects of Offset and Length of the Cementless Stem for Initial Fixation to the Femur.\",\"authors\":\"Yutaro Shibuta, Nobuhiro Kaku, Kensei Tanaka, Tsuguaki Hosoyama\",\"doi\":\"10.4055/cios24051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgroud: </strong>Implants with different neck offsets for hip replacement surgery are now available from various implant manufacturers and have become a widely used option for achieving postoperative hip stability. This study aimed to compare the impact of neck offset on initial stem fixation and the mechanical effects of different stem lengths when using cementless stems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a finite element analysis using Mechanical Finder ver. 12.0. CAD models of the Profemur Preserve and Profemur TL cementless stems. Each stem was appropriately sized, and the von Mises stress was calculated. We defined micromotion as the relative displacement between the stem node and the surface of bone contact. The maximum micromotion values of these finite element models were compared under standing conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stress per zone for both stems (Preserve and TL) was the highest in zone 5, followed by zones 3 and 4, which were almost in line with each other. The high offset (HIGH) stress was higher than the standard offset (STD) stress in each stem and zone. The micromotion of each stem was higher at each load in the following order: Preserve HIGH, Preserve STD, TL HIGH, and TL STD, with HIGH being higher than STD at each stem.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The choice of higher offset or shorter length stems induced higher micromotion at the interface to the bone in the early postoperative period. Therefore, surgeons should be more careful to get appropriate initial fixation using shorter stems with higher offset necks due to the relatively high incidence of loosening or fractures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"46-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791486/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24051\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24051","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:用于髋关节置换术的不同颈部偏移的假体现在可以从不同的假体制造商那里获得,并且已经成为实现术后髋关节稳定的广泛选择。本研究旨在比较颈部偏移对初始柄固定的影响以及使用无水泥柄时不同柄长度的机械效应。方法:采用Mechanical Finder软件进行有限元分析。12.0. Profemur Preserve和Profemur TL无骨水泥系统的CAD模型。每根茎取适当尺寸,计算von Mises应力。我们将微动定义为茎节与骨接触表面之间的相对位移。比较了两种有限元模型在静置条件下的最大微动值。结果:保存区和TL区两种茎的各区应力均以第5区最高,第3区和第4区次之,两者基本一致。高偏置应力(high)高于标准偏置应力(STD)。各杆在各负荷下的微动程度依次为:Preserve HIGH、Preserve STD、TL HIGH、TL STD,且各杆HIGH均高于STD。结论:术后早期选择较大偏移量或较短长度的骨柄可引起骨界面较高的微动。因此,由于相对较高的松动或骨折发生率,外科医生应该更加小心地使用较短的柄和较高的偏位颈来获得适当的初始固定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanical Effects of Offset and Length of the Cementless Stem for Initial Fixation to the Femur.

Backgroud: Implants with different neck offsets for hip replacement surgery are now available from various implant manufacturers and have become a widely used option for achieving postoperative hip stability. This study aimed to compare the impact of neck offset on initial stem fixation and the mechanical effects of different stem lengths when using cementless stems.

Methods: We performed a finite element analysis using Mechanical Finder ver. 12.0. CAD models of the Profemur Preserve and Profemur TL cementless stems. Each stem was appropriately sized, and the von Mises stress was calculated. We defined micromotion as the relative displacement between the stem node and the surface of bone contact. The maximum micromotion values of these finite element models were compared under standing conditions.

Results: The stress per zone for both stems (Preserve and TL) was the highest in zone 5, followed by zones 3 and 4, which were almost in line with each other. The high offset (HIGH) stress was higher than the standard offset (STD) stress in each stem and zone. The micromotion of each stem was higher at each load in the following order: Preserve HIGH, Preserve STD, TL HIGH, and TL STD, with HIGH being higher than STD at each stem.

Conclusions: The choice of higher offset or shorter length stems induced higher micromotion at the interface to the bone in the early postoperative period. Therefore, surgeons should be more careful to get appropriate initial fixation using shorter stems with higher offset necks due to the relatively high incidence of loosening or fractures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信