在新型药物时代,新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者的t(11;14)是一个有利的结果吗?

IF 2.3 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Ye Li, Jingjing Deng, Yuan Jian, Zhiyao Zhang, Wenming Chen
{"title":"在新型药物时代,新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者的t(11;14)是一个有利的结果吗?","authors":"Ye Li, Jingjing Deng, Yuan Jian, Zhiyao Zhang, Wenming Chen","doi":"10.1007/s44313-025-00056-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>t(11;14) is considered a standard risk factor in multiple myeloma (MM). However, recent studies suggested that its impact in the context of novel agents remained controversial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis examined the clinical profiles of 375 newly diagnosed patients with MM and compared the outcomes between those with t(11;14) and those with normal cytogenetics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 84 patients with t(11;14) was 36 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 23.5-48.5), which was significantly shorter than the median PFS of 65 months (95% CI, 23.0-107.0) for the 59 patients with normal cytogenetics (p = 0.011). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in either group (p = 0.977). When combined with 1q21 + , t(11;14) showed a trend toward poorer PFS (median PFS: 36 vs. 65 months; p = 0.130). In the presence of high-risk cytogenetics (HRCAs), t(11;14) was associated with a worse PFS (median PFS: 9 vs. 38 months, p = 0.015) and a trend toward shorter OS (median OS: 33 vs. 49 months, p = 0.096). Multivariate analysis indicated that t(11;14) was a poor prognostic factor for PFS. 1q21 + was a detrimental prognostic factor, particularly in the t(11;14) group. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) may be a beneficial treatment option for patients with t(11;14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, patients with MM with t(11;14) demonstrated poorer PFS than those with normal cytogenetics. Further investigations are required to evaluate the impact of t(11;14) in patients newly diagnosed with MM in the era of novel agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":46224,"journal":{"name":"Blood Research","volume":"60 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11802943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is t(11;14) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma a favorable outcome in the novel agent era?\",\"authors\":\"Ye Li, Jingjing Deng, Yuan Jian, Zhiyao Zhang, Wenming Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44313-025-00056-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>t(11;14) is considered a standard risk factor in multiple myeloma (MM). However, recent studies suggested that its impact in the context of novel agents remained controversial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis examined the clinical profiles of 375 newly diagnosed patients with MM and compared the outcomes between those with t(11;14) and those with normal cytogenetics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 84 patients with t(11;14) was 36 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 23.5-48.5), which was significantly shorter than the median PFS of 65 months (95% CI, 23.0-107.0) for the 59 patients with normal cytogenetics (p = 0.011). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in either group (p = 0.977). When combined with 1q21 + , t(11;14) showed a trend toward poorer PFS (median PFS: 36 vs. 65 months; p = 0.130). In the presence of high-risk cytogenetics (HRCAs), t(11;14) was associated with a worse PFS (median PFS: 9 vs. 38 months, p = 0.015) and a trend toward shorter OS (median OS: 33 vs. 49 months, p = 0.096). Multivariate analysis indicated that t(11;14) was a poor prognostic factor for PFS. 1q21 + was a detrimental prognostic factor, particularly in the t(11;14) group. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) may be a beneficial treatment option for patients with t(11;14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, patients with MM with t(11;14) demonstrated poorer PFS than those with normal cytogenetics. Further investigations are required to evaluate the impact of t(11;14) in patients newly diagnosed with MM in the era of novel agents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Research\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11802943/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44313-025-00056-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44313-025-00056-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:t(11;14)被认为是多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的标准危险因素。然而,最近的研究表明,其在新药物背景下的影响仍然存在争议。方法:回顾性分析了375例新诊断的MM患者的临床资料,并比较了t(11;14)和正常细胞遗传学患者的结果。结果:84例t(11;14)患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为36个月(95%可信区间(CI) 23.5-48.5),显著短于59例细胞遗传学正常患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS) 65个月(95% CI, 23.0-107.0) (p = 0.011)。两组的中位总生存期均未达到(p = 0.977)。当与1q21 +联合使用时,t(11;14)显示出较差的PFS趋势(中位PFS: 36 vs 65个月;p = 0.130)。在存在高危细胞遗传学(HRCAs)的情况下,t(11;14)与更差的PFS(中位PFS: 9 vs. 38个月,p = 0.015)和更短的OS(中位OS: 33 vs. 49个月,p = 0.096)相关。多因素分析表明,t(11;14)是PFS的不良预后因素。1q21 +是一个不利的预后因素,特别是在t(11;14)组。自体干细胞移植(ASCT)可能是t患者有益的治疗选择(11;14)。结论:在本研究中,MM伴t(11;14)患者的PFS较细胞遗传学正常的患者差。在新药物时代,需要进一步的研究来评估t(11;14)对新诊断的MM患者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is t(11;14) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma a favorable outcome in the novel agent era?

Background: t(11;14) is considered a standard risk factor in multiple myeloma (MM). However, recent studies suggested that its impact in the context of novel agents remained controversial.

Methods: This retrospective analysis examined the clinical profiles of 375 newly diagnosed patients with MM and compared the outcomes between those with t(11;14) and those with normal cytogenetics.

Results: The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 84 patients with t(11;14) was 36 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 23.5-48.5), which was significantly shorter than the median PFS of 65 months (95% CI, 23.0-107.0) for the 59 patients with normal cytogenetics (p = 0.011). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in either group (p = 0.977). When combined with 1q21 + , t(11;14) showed a trend toward poorer PFS (median PFS: 36 vs. 65 months; p = 0.130). In the presence of high-risk cytogenetics (HRCAs), t(11;14) was associated with a worse PFS (median PFS: 9 vs. 38 months, p = 0.015) and a trend toward shorter OS (median OS: 33 vs. 49 months, p = 0.096). Multivariate analysis indicated that t(11;14) was a poor prognostic factor for PFS. 1q21 + was a detrimental prognostic factor, particularly in the t(11;14) group. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) may be a beneficial treatment option for patients with t(11;14).

Conclusion: In this study, patients with MM with t(11;14) demonstrated poorer PFS than those with normal cytogenetics. Further investigations are required to evaluate the impact of t(11;14) in patients newly diagnosed with MM in the era of novel agents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Research
Blood Research HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信