预防内翻足复发的单侧支具的设计和评价:一项前瞻性研究。

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Fabricio Y Zapparoli, José B Volpon
{"title":"预防内翻足复发的单侧支具的设计和评价:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Fabricio Y Zapparoli, José B Volpon","doi":"10.1177/20556683251313768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Ponseti technique is highly effective for correcting congenital clubfoot; however, recurrence must be prevented using orthoses. The double abduction brace (D- A) is recommended by Ponseti and is widely used. However, more user-friendly orthoses have been developed because treatment abandonment with the traditional orthosis is frequent. We report the results obtained using a newly designed unilateral orthosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A unilateral orthosis (UNIC-Brace) was developed and tested in a prospective non-randomized study conducted between 2017 and 2020. The Pirani score was used to monitor the progression of the deformity during plaster correction. The D-A brace (Denis Browne model) served as the control group. The primary outcomes were recurrence rate, treatment adherence, and caregiver satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 58 patients (87 feet) in the test group and 51 patients (75 feet) in the control group, with a minimum follow-up period of 3 years. No significant differences in epidemiological data or follow-up duration were observed between the two groups. The failure feet rates in D-A brace and UNIC-Brace groups were 41.3% and 17.2%, respectively (<i>p</i> < .001). Non-adherence patients to treatment were 23.5% in the D-A brace and 13.8% in the UNIC-Brace group (<i>p</i> < .001). Overall, 13.7% of families were not satisfied with the D-A orthosis, whereas 5.2% were not satisfied with the UNIC- Brace (<i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The UNIC-Brace yielded better outcomes than the traditional orthosis at a minimum follow-up period of 3 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"12 ","pages":"20556683251313768"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and evaluation of a unilateral brace for preventing clubfoot relapse: A prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Fabricio Y Zapparoli, José B Volpon\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20556683251313768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Ponseti technique is highly effective for correcting congenital clubfoot; however, recurrence must be prevented using orthoses. The double abduction brace (D- A) is recommended by Ponseti and is widely used. However, more user-friendly orthoses have been developed because treatment abandonment with the traditional orthosis is frequent. We report the results obtained using a newly designed unilateral orthosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A unilateral orthosis (UNIC-Brace) was developed and tested in a prospective non-randomized study conducted between 2017 and 2020. The Pirani score was used to monitor the progression of the deformity during plaster correction. The D-A brace (Denis Browne model) served as the control group. The primary outcomes were recurrence rate, treatment adherence, and caregiver satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 58 patients (87 feet) in the test group and 51 patients (75 feet) in the control group, with a minimum follow-up period of 3 years. No significant differences in epidemiological data or follow-up duration were observed between the two groups. The failure feet rates in D-A brace and UNIC-Brace groups were 41.3% and 17.2%, respectively (<i>p</i> < .001). Non-adherence patients to treatment were 23.5% in the D-A brace and 13.8% in the UNIC-Brace group (<i>p</i> < .001). Overall, 13.7% of families were not satisfied with the D-A orthosis, whereas 5.2% were not satisfied with the UNIC- Brace (<i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The UNIC-Brace yielded better outcomes than the traditional orthosis at a minimum follow-up period of 3 years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"20556683251313768\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795612/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683251313768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683251313768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:Ponseti技术是一种非常有效的先天性畸形足矫正术;然而,必须使用矫形器防止复发。双外展支架(D- A)是Ponseti推荐并广泛应用的。然而,由于放弃使用传统矫形器的情况经常发生,因此开发出了更加人性化的矫形器。我们报告使用新设计的单侧矫形器获得的结果。方法:在2017年至2020年期间进行的一项前瞻性非随机研究中,开发并测试了单侧矫形器(uni - brace)。皮拉尼评分用于监测石膏矫正期间畸形的进展。D-A支具(Denis Browne模型)作为对照组。主要结局是复发率、治疗依从性和护理者满意度。结果:试验组58例(87英尺),对照组51例(75英尺),随访时间最短为3年。两组间流行病学资料和随访时间无显著差异。D-A支具组和uni - brace组的失败率分别为41.3%和17.2% (p < 0.001)。D-A支具组治疗不依从率为23.5%,uni - brace组为13.8% (p < 0.001)。总体而言,13.7%的家庭对D-A矫形器不满意,而5.2%的家庭对UNIC-支具不满意(p < 0.001)。结论:在至少3年的随访期内,uni - brace比传统矫形器有更好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design and evaluation of a unilateral brace for preventing clubfoot relapse: A prospective study.

Introduction: The Ponseti technique is highly effective for correcting congenital clubfoot; however, recurrence must be prevented using orthoses. The double abduction brace (D- A) is recommended by Ponseti and is widely used. However, more user-friendly orthoses have been developed because treatment abandonment with the traditional orthosis is frequent. We report the results obtained using a newly designed unilateral orthosis.

Methods: A unilateral orthosis (UNIC-Brace) was developed and tested in a prospective non-randomized study conducted between 2017 and 2020. The Pirani score was used to monitor the progression of the deformity during plaster correction. The D-A brace (Denis Browne model) served as the control group. The primary outcomes were recurrence rate, treatment adherence, and caregiver satisfaction.

Results: The study included 58 patients (87 feet) in the test group and 51 patients (75 feet) in the control group, with a minimum follow-up period of 3 years. No significant differences in epidemiological data or follow-up duration were observed between the two groups. The failure feet rates in D-A brace and UNIC-Brace groups were 41.3% and 17.2%, respectively (p < .001). Non-adherence patients to treatment were 23.5% in the D-A brace and 13.8% in the UNIC-Brace group (p < .001). Overall, 13.7% of families were not satisfied with the D-A orthosis, whereas 5.2% were not satisfied with the UNIC- Brace (p < .001).

Conclusions: The UNIC-Brace yielded better outcomes than the traditional orthosis at a minimum follow-up period of 3 years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信