{"title":"通过RSM和机器学习的协同应用,利用碳基吸附剂从液体燃料中去除硫的优化和建模。","authors":"Karim Maghfour Sarkarabad, Mohsen Shayanmehr, Ahad Ghaemi","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-88434-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research investigates the adsorption desulfurization of liquid fuels using artificial neural networks (ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM) approaches. The effectiveness of sulfur removal was predicted by analyzing five important factors: temperature, concentration, surface area, fuel/adsorbent, and time. We employed radial basis function (RBF) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) algorithms for ANN modeling. The optimal MLP configuration, utilizing the Levenberg-Marquardt (Trainlm) algorithm, consisted of three hidden layers with 20, 17, and 9 neurons, respectively, while the optimal RBF network contained 43 neurons. The MLP network's determination coefficient (R<sup>2</sup>) was 0.98 over 30 epochs, and its mean squared error (MSE) was 0.0028. The RBF network also obtained an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.98 and an MSE of 0.0026 over 40 epochs. A two-factor interaction design served as the basis for the RSM model, which produced an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.91. A comparison of the RSM, MLP, and RBF models, using the average absolute relative deviation, indicated that the ANN models, particularly the RBF model, produced more accurate predictions than the RSM model. The findings show that temperature and concentration were the two most significant factors influencing sulfur removal efficiency. Overall, artificial neural networks outperformed the RSM approach in predicting desulfurization performance, providing a more reliable modeling tool for optimizing the sulfur removal process.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"4330"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11799450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization and modeling of sulfur removal from liquid fuel using carbon-based adsorbents through synergistic application of RSM and machine learning.\",\"authors\":\"Karim Maghfour Sarkarabad, Mohsen Shayanmehr, Ahad Ghaemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-88434-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This research investigates the adsorption desulfurization of liquid fuels using artificial neural networks (ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM) approaches. The effectiveness of sulfur removal was predicted by analyzing five important factors: temperature, concentration, surface area, fuel/adsorbent, and time. We employed radial basis function (RBF) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) algorithms for ANN modeling. The optimal MLP configuration, utilizing the Levenberg-Marquardt (Trainlm) algorithm, consisted of three hidden layers with 20, 17, and 9 neurons, respectively, while the optimal RBF network contained 43 neurons. The MLP network's determination coefficient (R<sup>2</sup>) was 0.98 over 30 epochs, and its mean squared error (MSE) was 0.0028. The RBF network also obtained an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.98 and an MSE of 0.0026 over 40 epochs. A two-factor interaction design served as the basis for the RSM model, which produced an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.91. A comparison of the RSM, MLP, and RBF models, using the average absolute relative deviation, indicated that the ANN models, particularly the RBF model, produced more accurate predictions than the RSM model. The findings show that temperature and concentration were the two most significant factors influencing sulfur removal efficiency. Overall, artificial neural networks outperformed the RSM approach in predicting desulfurization performance, providing a more reliable modeling tool for optimizing the sulfur removal process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"4330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11799450/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88434-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88434-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimization and modeling of sulfur removal from liquid fuel using carbon-based adsorbents through synergistic application of RSM and machine learning.
This research investigates the adsorption desulfurization of liquid fuels using artificial neural networks (ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM) approaches. The effectiveness of sulfur removal was predicted by analyzing five important factors: temperature, concentration, surface area, fuel/adsorbent, and time. We employed radial basis function (RBF) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) algorithms for ANN modeling. The optimal MLP configuration, utilizing the Levenberg-Marquardt (Trainlm) algorithm, consisted of three hidden layers with 20, 17, and 9 neurons, respectively, while the optimal RBF network contained 43 neurons. The MLP network's determination coefficient (R2) was 0.98 over 30 epochs, and its mean squared error (MSE) was 0.0028. The RBF network also obtained an R2 of 0.98 and an MSE of 0.0026 over 40 epochs. A two-factor interaction design served as the basis for the RSM model, which produced an R2 of 0.91. A comparison of the RSM, MLP, and RBF models, using the average absolute relative deviation, indicated that the ANN models, particularly the RBF model, produced more accurate predictions than the RSM model. The findings show that temperature and concentration were the two most significant factors influencing sulfur removal efficiency. Overall, artificial neural networks outperformed the RSM approach in predicting desulfurization performance, providing a more reliable modeling tool for optimizing the sulfur removal process.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.