使用三维超声成像比较有和没有青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的参与者站立位置的根尖间距离和冠状平衡测量。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-05-15 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005284
Janie Pollard, Brianna Fehr, Aislinn Ganci, Eric C Parent, Edmond Lou
{"title":"使用三维超声成像比较有和没有青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的参与者站立位置的根尖间距离和冠状平衡测量。","authors":"Janie Pollard, Brianna Fehr, Aislinn Ganci, Eric C Parent, Edmond Lou","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to quantify whether interapical distance and coronal balance measured on 3D ultrasound (3DUS) images differed among 10 standing positions of participants with and without adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Apical vertebral translation (AVT) is an indicator of clinical symptoms and treatment outcomes in AIS. Stereoradiography simultaneously captures a frontal and lateral image, yet patients are required to elevate their arms during the examination and varied positioning may impact coronal plane measurements. Ultrasound can assess these measurements without exposing participants to radiation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Females with and without AIS were recruited from a scoliosis clinic, and e-mail advertisements, respectively. Participants underwent 3DUS scans in 10 positions: standing; arms anteriorly supported in 60° of shoulder flexion; fingers to clavicles, chin, zygomatic processes, and eyebrows; shoulders abducted at 90° with hands open and thumbs on shoulders; hands on anterior wall with and without blocks; and hands unsupported. AVT and coronal balance measurements were obtained using custom software. Positions and groups were compared using repeated measures ANOVAs with Sidak pairwise comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine females had a mean age, height, and weight of 17.5±4.9 years, 162.8±5.8 cm, and 56.2±10.6 kg, respectively. Seventeen single and 14 double curve participants were included with mean maximum curve angles of 26.4°±3.6° and 25.2°±3.1°, respectively. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in interapical distance or coronal balance among the 10 positions, as well as in coronal balance between the groups ( P >0.05). The interapical distance of participants without AIS significantly differed from those with single curves in eight positions and from those with double curves in all 10 positions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The positions evaluated may be interchangeable for coronal plane lateral deviation measurements of females with AIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"652-663"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparisons of Interapical Distance and Coronal Balance Measurements Among Standing Positions in Participants With and Without Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using 3D Ultrasound Imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Janie Pollard, Brianna Fehr, Aislinn Ganci, Eric C Parent, Edmond Lou\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to quantify whether interapical distance and coronal balance measured on 3D ultrasound (3DUS) images differed among 10 standing positions of participants with and without adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Apical vertebral translation (AVT) is an indicator of clinical symptoms and treatment outcomes in AIS. Stereoradiography simultaneously captures a frontal and lateral image, yet patients are required to elevate their arms during the examination and varied positioning may impact coronal plane measurements. Ultrasound can assess these measurements without exposing participants to radiation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Females with and without AIS were recruited from a scoliosis clinic, and e-mail advertisements, respectively. Participants underwent 3DUS scans in 10 positions: standing; arms anteriorly supported in 60° of shoulder flexion; fingers to clavicles, chin, zygomatic processes, and eyebrows; shoulders abducted at 90° with hands open and thumbs on shoulders; hands on anterior wall with and without blocks; and hands unsupported. AVT and coronal balance measurements were obtained using custom software. Positions and groups were compared using repeated measures ANOVAs with Sidak pairwise comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine females had a mean age, height, and weight of 17.5±4.9 years, 162.8±5.8 cm, and 56.2±10.6 kg, respectively. Seventeen single and 14 double curve participants were included with mean maximum curve angles of 26.4°±3.6° and 25.2°±3.1°, respectively. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in interapical distance or coronal balance among the 10 positions, as well as in coronal balance between the groups ( P >0.05). The interapical distance of participants without AIS significantly differed from those with single curves in eight positions and from those with double curves in all 10 positions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The positions evaluated may be interchangeable for coronal plane lateral deviation measurements of females with AIS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"652-663\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005284\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:横断面研究。目的:本研究的目的是量化在有和没有青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)的参与者的10个站立姿势中,三维超声(3DUS)图像测量的根尖间距离和冠状平衡是否存在差异。背景资料总结:椎体顶点平移(AVT)是AIS临床症状和治疗结果的指标。立体摄影同时捕获正面和侧面图像,但患者在检查时需要抬起手臂,不同的位置可能会影响冠状面测量。超声波可以在不让参与者暴露于辐射的情况下评估这些测量结果。方法:分别从脊柱侧凸门诊和电子邮件广告中招募患有和不患有AIS的女性。参与者在10种姿势下接受3DUS扫描:站立;双臂前支撑,肩关节屈曲60°;手指到锁骨、下巴、颧骨突和眉毛;肩部90°外展,双手张开,拇指放在肩部;手放在前壁上,有无阻塞;双手没有支撑。AVT和冠状平衡测量使用定制软件。位置和组间比较采用重复测量方差分析和Sidak两两比较。结果:59例女性患者平均年龄17.5±4.9岁,平均身高162.8±5.8 cm,平均体重56.2±10.6 kg。单曲线17例,双曲线14例,平均最大曲线角度分别为26.4°±3.6°和25.2°±3.1°。总体而言,10个位置间根尖间距、冠状平衡、组间冠状平衡差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。无AIS受试者的根尖间距离与8个体位单侧弯曲者和10个体位双侧弯曲者有显著差异。结论:在女性AIS患者的冠状面侧偏测量中,测量的位置可以互换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparisons of Interapical Distance and Coronal Balance Measurements Among Standing Positions in Participants With and Without Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using 3D Ultrasound Imaging.

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Objective: The objective of this study was to quantify whether interapical distance and coronal balance measured on 3D ultrasound (3DUS) images differed among 10 standing positions of participants with and without adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Summary of background data: Apical vertebral translation (AVT) is an indicator of clinical symptoms and treatment outcomes in AIS. Stereoradiography simultaneously captures a frontal and lateral image, yet patients are required to elevate their arms during the examination and varied positioning may impact coronal plane measurements. Ultrasound can assess these measurements without exposing participants to radiation.

Materials and methods: Females with and without AIS were recruited from a scoliosis clinic, and e-mail advertisements, respectively. Participants underwent 3DUS scans in 10 positions: standing; arms anteriorly supported in 60° of shoulder flexion; fingers to clavicles, chin, zygomatic processes, and eyebrows; shoulders abducted at 90° with hands open and thumbs on shoulders; hands on anterior wall with and without blocks; and hands unsupported. AVT and coronal balance measurements were obtained using custom software. Positions and groups were compared using repeated measures ANOVAs with Sidak pairwise comparisons.

Results: Fifty-nine females had a mean age, height, and weight of 17.5±4.9 years, 162.8±5.8 cm, and 56.2±10.6 kg, respectively. Seventeen single and 14 double curve participants were included with mean maximum curve angles of 26.4°±3.6° and 25.2°±3.1°, respectively. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in interapical distance or coronal balance among the 10 positions, as well as in coronal balance between the groups ( P >0.05). The interapical distance of participants without AIS significantly differed from those with single curves in eight positions and from those with double curves in all 10 positions.

Conclusions: The positions evaluated may be interchangeable for coronal plane lateral deviation measurements of females with AIS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信