超声弹性成像根据经验水平和解剖位置的可靠性。

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.4055/cios24190
Seul-Gi Kim, Bongkyung Park, Kyosun Hwang, Woong Kyo Jeong
{"title":"超声弹性成像根据经验水平和解剖位置的可靠性。","authors":"Seul-Gi Kim, Bongkyung Park, Kyosun Hwang, Woong Kyo Jeong","doi":"10.4055/cios24190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgroud: </strong>Strain elastography (SE) and shear wave elastography (SWE) are emerging techniques for evaluating the elasticity of soft tissue. This study aimed to determine interobserver and intraobserver reliability for elasticity measurements of different tissues and anatomic locations using SE and SWE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten healthy adult male individuals with 20 upper extremities participated in this study. The elasticities of the wrist extensor muscle, the common extensor tendon, and supraspinatus tendon were measured. Strain ratio and shear wave velocity were measured twice by 2 different examiners (examiner 1 with over 20 years of experience in musculoskeletal sonography and examiner 2 with 1 year of experience). Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 10 individuals' age ranged from 28 to 35 years. In SE, interobserver reliabilities at the 3 anatomic locations (wrist extensor muscle, common extensor tendon, and supraspinatus tendon) showed fair to moderate agreement (ICC = 0.489, <i>p</i> = 0.076; ICC = 0.408, <i>p</i> = 0.131; and ICC = 0.296, <i>p</i> = 0.711, respectively). The intraobserver reliabilities of examiner 1 were moderate to substantial only at the wrist extensor muscle and the common extensor tendon (ICC = 0.563, <i>p</i> = 0.039 and ICC = 0.702, <i>p</i> = 0.006, respectively). In SWE, interobserver reliabilities for the wrist extensor muscle and the supraspinatus tendon were moderate to substantial (ICC = 0.756, <i>p</i> = 0.002 and ICC = 0.565, <i>p</i> = 0.039, respectively). The intraobserver reliabilities of examiner 1 at the 3 anatomic locations were almost perfect (ICC = 0.843, <i>p</i> = 0.001; ICC = 0.800, <i>p</i> = 0.001; and ICC = 0.825, <i>p</i> = 0.001, respectively). The results of examiner 2 showed almost perfect agreement at the wrist extensor muscle (ICC = 0.886, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and moderate to substantial agreement at the tendons of the common extensor and supraspinatus (ICC = 0.592, <i>p</i> = 0.029 and ICC = 0.682, <i>p</i> = 0.008, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SWE is a reliable method for assessing the flexibility of soft tissue, but it is affected by expertise and the specific anatomical site.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":"166-173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Ultrasound Elastography According to Experience Level and Anatomic Location.\",\"authors\":\"Seul-Gi Kim, Bongkyung Park, Kyosun Hwang, Woong Kyo Jeong\",\"doi\":\"10.4055/cios24190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgroud: </strong>Strain elastography (SE) and shear wave elastography (SWE) are emerging techniques for evaluating the elasticity of soft tissue. This study aimed to determine interobserver and intraobserver reliability for elasticity measurements of different tissues and anatomic locations using SE and SWE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten healthy adult male individuals with 20 upper extremities participated in this study. The elasticities of the wrist extensor muscle, the common extensor tendon, and supraspinatus tendon were measured. Strain ratio and shear wave velocity were measured twice by 2 different examiners (examiner 1 with over 20 years of experience in musculoskeletal sonography and examiner 2 with 1 year of experience). Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 10 individuals' age ranged from 28 to 35 years. In SE, interobserver reliabilities at the 3 anatomic locations (wrist extensor muscle, common extensor tendon, and supraspinatus tendon) showed fair to moderate agreement (ICC = 0.489, <i>p</i> = 0.076; ICC = 0.408, <i>p</i> = 0.131; and ICC = 0.296, <i>p</i> = 0.711, respectively). The intraobserver reliabilities of examiner 1 were moderate to substantial only at the wrist extensor muscle and the common extensor tendon (ICC = 0.563, <i>p</i> = 0.039 and ICC = 0.702, <i>p</i> = 0.006, respectively). In SWE, interobserver reliabilities for the wrist extensor muscle and the supraspinatus tendon were moderate to substantial (ICC = 0.756, <i>p</i> = 0.002 and ICC = 0.565, <i>p</i> = 0.039, respectively). The intraobserver reliabilities of examiner 1 at the 3 anatomic locations were almost perfect (ICC = 0.843, <i>p</i> = 0.001; ICC = 0.800, <i>p</i> = 0.001; and ICC = 0.825, <i>p</i> = 0.001, respectively). The results of examiner 2 showed almost perfect agreement at the wrist extensor muscle (ICC = 0.886, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and moderate to substantial agreement at the tendons of the common extensor and supraspinatus (ICC = 0.592, <i>p</i> = 0.029 and ICC = 0.682, <i>p</i> = 0.008, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SWE is a reliable method for assessing the flexibility of soft tissue, but it is affected by expertise and the specific anatomical site.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"166-173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791484/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24190\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:应变弹性学(SE)和横波弹性学(SWE)是评估软组织弹性的新兴技术。本研究旨在确定使用SE和SWE对不同组织和解剖位置进行弹性测量的观察者之间和观察者内部的可靠性。方法:健康成年男性10例,上肢20条。测量腕部伸肌、伸总肌腱和冈上肌腱的弹性。应变比和横波速度由2名不同的检验员(检验员1有超过20年的肌肉骨骼超声经验,检验员2有1年的经验)测量两次。使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估观察者间和观察者内的信度。结果:10例患者年龄在28 ~ 35岁之间。在SE中,3个解剖位置(腕伸肌、总伸肌腱和冈上肌腱)的观察者间信度显示了相当到中等程度的一致性(ICC = 0.489, p = 0.076;ICC = 0.408, p = 0.131;ICC = 0.296, p = 0.711)。检查者1的观察者内信度仅在腕伸肌和总伸肌腱处为中等至实质性(ICC = 0.563, p = 0.039和ICC = 0.702, p = 0.006)。在SWE中,腕伸肌和冈上肌腱的观察者间信度为中等至相当(ICC = 0.756, p = 0.002和ICC = 0.565, p = 0.039)。检查者1在3个解剖位置的观察者内信度几乎是完美的(ICC = 0.843, p = 0.001;ICC = 0.800, p = 0.001;ICC = 0.825, p = 0.001)。检查者2的结果显示,腕伸肌几乎完全一致(ICC = 0.886, p = 0.001),伸总肌和冈上肌肌腱的结果中等到基本一致(ICC = 0.592, p = 0.029和ICC = 0.682, p = 0.008)。结论:SWE是一种可靠的评估软组织柔韧性的方法,但受专业知识和特定解剖部位的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability of Ultrasound Elastography According to Experience Level and Anatomic Location.

Backgroud: Strain elastography (SE) and shear wave elastography (SWE) are emerging techniques for evaluating the elasticity of soft tissue. This study aimed to determine interobserver and intraobserver reliability for elasticity measurements of different tissues and anatomic locations using SE and SWE.

Methods: Ten healthy adult male individuals with 20 upper extremities participated in this study. The elasticities of the wrist extensor muscle, the common extensor tendon, and supraspinatus tendon were measured. Strain ratio and shear wave velocity were measured twice by 2 different examiners (examiner 1 with over 20 years of experience in musculoskeletal sonography and examiner 2 with 1 year of experience). Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: The 10 individuals' age ranged from 28 to 35 years. In SE, interobserver reliabilities at the 3 anatomic locations (wrist extensor muscle, common extensor tendon, and supraspinatus tendon) showed fair to moderate agreement (ICC = 0.489, p = 0.076; ICC = 0.408, p = 0.131; and ICC = 0.296, p = 0.711, respectively). The intraobserver reliabilities of examiner 1 were moderate to substantial only at the wrist extensor muscle and the common extensor tendon (ICC = 0.563, p = 0.039 and ICC = 0.702, p = 0.006, respectively). In SWE, interobserver reliabilities for the wrist extensor muscle and the supraspinatus tendon were moderate to substantial (ICC = 0.756, p = 0.002 and ICC = 0.565, p = 0.039, respectively). The intraobserver reliabilities of examiner 1 at the 3 anatomic locations were almost perfect (ICC = 0.843, p = 0.001; ICC = 0.800, p = 0.001; and ICC = 0.825, p = 0.001, respectively). The results of examiner 2 showed almost perfect agreement at the wrist extensor muscle (ICC = 0.886, p = 0.001) and moderate to substantial agreement at the tendons of the common extensor and supraspinatus (ICC = 0.592, p = 0.029 and ICC = 0.682, p = 0.008, respectively).

Conclusions: SWE is a reliable method for assessing the flexibility of soft tissue, but it is affected by expertise and the specific anatomical site.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信