前倾时,指屈肌短肌运动单元活动对维持平衡的作用。

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Sports Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1080/02640414.2025.2462356
Chrysi Tsiouri, Ioannis G Amiridis, Anthi Angelou, Nikolaos Varvariotis, Chrysostomos Sahinis, Theodoros Kannas, Vassilia Hatzitaki, Roger M Enoka
{"title":"前倾时,指屈肌短肌运动单元活动对维持平衡的作用。","authors":"Chrysi Tsiouri, Ioannis G Amiridis, Anthi Angelou, Nikolaos Varvariotis, Chrysostomos Sahinis, Theodoros Kannas, Vassilia Hatzitaki, Roger M Enoka","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2462356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our purpose was to compare the influence of motor unit activity in Flexor Digitorum Brevis (FDB) and Soleus (SOL) on force fluctuations during three forward-leaning tasks. Ground reaction forces and high-density EMG signals were collected from 19 males when leaning forward at 25%, 50%, and 75% of maximal forward leaning force. EMG amplitude increased with percent of leaning and was greater for SOL than FDB, but there were no differences in force fluctuations across tasks. Differences in motor unit activity indicated that the relative contribution of the two muscles to the control of balance varied across tasks as confirmed by the association between the fluctuations in neural drive [standard deviation of the filtered cumulative spike train (SD of fCST)] and force [coefficient of variation (CoV) for force]. Specifically, the correlation values were greater for FDB at the lower target forces. Correlation analyses revealed that synaptic noise (CoV for interspike interval) was weakly correlated with the CoV for force, whereas the variability in shared synaptic input (SD of fCST) was strongly correlated with the CoV for force. This finding suggests that the relative influence of the two muscles on the fluctuations in force during forward leaning varied with task requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"468-476"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of motor unit activity in flexor digitorum brevis to maintain balance during forward leaning.\",\"authors\":\"Chrysi Tsiouri, Ioannis G Amiridis, Anthi Angelou, Nikolaos Varvariotis, Chrysostomos Sahinis, Theodoros Kannas, Vassilia Hatzitaki, Roger M Enoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2025.2462356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our purpose was to compare the influence of motor unit activity in Flexor Digitorum Brevis (FDB) and Soleus (SOL) on force fluctuations during three forward-leaning tasks. Ground reaction forces and high-density EMG signals were collected from 19 males when leaning forward at 25%, 50%, and 75% of maximal forward leaning force. EMG amplitude increased with percent of leaning and was greater for SOL than FDB, but there were no differences in force fluctuations across tasks. Differences in motor unit activity indicated that the relative contribution of the two muscles to the control of balance varied across tasks as confirmed by the association between the fluctuations in neural drive [standard deviation of the filtered cumulative spike train (SD of fCST)] and force [coefficient of variation (CoV) for force]. Specifically, the correlation values were greater for FDB at the lower target forces. Correlation analyses revealed that synaptic noise (CoV for interspike interval) was weakly correlated with the CoV for force, whereas the variability in shared synaptic input (SD of fCST) was strongly correlated with the CoV for force. This finding suggests that the relative influence of the two muscles on the fluctuations in force during forward leaning varied with task requirements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"468-476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2462356\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2462356","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是比较短指屈肌(FDB)和比目鱼肌(SOL)的运动单元活动对三个前倾任务中力波动的影响。采集19名男性在前倾力为最大前倾力的25%、50%和75%时的地面反作用力和高密度肌电图信号。肌电振幅随倾斜百分比的增加而增加,SOL比FDB更大,但不同任务间的力波动没有差异。运动单元活动的差异表明,两种肌肉对平衡控制的相对贡献在不同的任务中有所不同,神经驱动波动[滤过的累积尖峰序列的标准差(SD of fCST)]和力[力的变异系数(CoV)]之间的关联证实了这一点。具体而言,在较低的目标力下,FDB的相关值更大。相关分析表明,突触噪声(CoV)与力的CoV呈弱相关,而共享突触输入的变异性(SD)与力的CoV呈强相关。这一发现表明,在前倾过程中,这两块肌肉对力波动的相对影响随任务要求而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of motor unit activity in flexor digitorum brevis to maintain balance during forward leaning.

Our purpose was to compare the influence of motor unit activity in Flexor Digitorum Brevis (FDB) and Soleus (SOL) on force fluctuations during three forward-leaning tasks. Ground reaction forces and high-density EMG signals were collected from 19 males when leaning forward at 25%, 50%, and 75% of maximal forward leaning force. EMG amplitude increased with percent of leaning and was greater for SOL than FDB, but there were no differences in force fluctuations across tasks. Differences in motor unit activity indicated that the relative contribution of the two muscles to the control of balance varied across tasks as confirmed by the association between the fluctuations in neural drive [standard deviation of the filtered cumulative spike train (SD of fCST)] and force [coefficient of variation (CoV) for force]. Specifically, the correlation values were greater for FDB at the lower target forces. Correlation analyses revealed that synaptic noise (CoV for interspike interval) was weakly correlated with the CoV for force, whereas the variability in shared synaptic input (SD of fCST) was strongly correlated with the CoV for force. This finding suggests that the relative influence of the two muscles on the fluctuations in force during forward leaning varied with task requirements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信